Literature DB >> 23148651

Further insights on the French WISC-IV factor structure through Bayesian structural equation modeling.

Philippe Golay1, Isabelle Reverte1, Jérôme Rossier2, Nicolas Favez1, Thierry Lecerf1.   

Abstract

The interpretation of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) is based on a 4-factor model, which is only partially compatible with the mainstream Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model of intelligence measurement. The structure of cognitive batteries is frequently analyzed via exploratory factor analysis and/or confirmatory factor analysis. With classical confirmatory factor analysis, almost all cross-loadings between latent variables and measures are fixed to zero in order to allow the model to be identified. However, inappropriate zero cross-loadings can contribute to poor model fit, distorted factors, and biased factor correlations; most important, they do not necessarily faithfully reflect theory. To deal with these methodological and theoretical limitations, we used a new statistical approach, Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM), among a sample of 249 French-speaking Swiss children (8-12 years). With BSEM, zero-fixed cross-loadings between latent variables and measures are replaced by approximate zeros, based on informative, small-variance priors. Results indicated that a direct hierarchical CHC-based model with 5 factors plus a general intelligence factor better represented the structure of the WISC-IV than did the 4-factor structure and the higher order models. Because a direct hierarchical CHC model was more adequate, it was concluded that the general factor should be considered as a breadth rather than a superordinate factor. Because it was possible for us to estimate the influence of each of the latent variables on the 15 subtest scores, BSEM allowed improvement of the understanding of the structure of intelligence tests and the clinical interpretation of the subtest scores. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148651     DOI: 10.1037/a0030676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  8 in total

1.  Strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013).

Authors:  Cameron N McIntosh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition in a Group of Children with ADHD.

Authors:  Rapson Gomez; Alasdair Vance; Shaun D Watson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-30

3.  Evaluating the higher-order structure of the Profile of Emotional Competence (PEC): Confirmatory factor analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Yuki Nozaki; Alicia Puente-Martínez; Moïra Mikolajczak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Importance of Prior Sensitivity Analysis in Bayesian Statistics: Demonstrations Using an Interactive Shiny App.

Authors:  Sarah Depaoli; Sonja D Winter; Marieke Visser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Aleksandra Bujacz; Joar Vittersø; Veronika Huta; Lukasz D Kaczmarek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08

6.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two Applying Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling (BSEM) and Multiple-Group BSEM-Based Alignment with Approximate Measurement Invariance.

Authors:  Niki De Bondt; Peter Van Petegem
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-24

7.  Short Forms of Wechsler Scales Assessing the Intellectually Gifted Children Using Simulation Data.

Authors:  Alexandre Aubry; Béatrice Bourdin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-28

8.  Comparative organizational research starts with sound measurement: Validity and invariance of Turker's corporate social responsibility scale in five cross-cultural samples.

Authors:  Daniel Schulze; Kathrin Heinitz; Timo Lorenz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.