IMPORTANCE: Whereas many persons at advanced ages live independently and are free of disability, we know little about how likely older people are to be disabled in the basic activities of daily living that are necessary for independent living as they enter the last years of life. OBJECTIVE: To determine national estimates of disability during the last 2 years of life. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A nationally representative study of older adults in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants 50 years and older who died while enrolled in the Health and Retirement Study between 1995 and 2010. Each participant was interviewed once at a varying time point in the last 24 months of life. We used these interviews to calculate national estimates of the prevalence of disability across the 2 years prior to death. We modeled the prevalence of disability in the 2 years prior to death for groups defined by age at death and sex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Disability was defined as need for help with at least 1 of the following activities of daily living: dressing, bathing, eating, transferring, walking across the room, and using the toilet. RESULTS: There were 8232 decedents (mean [SD] age at death, 79 [11] years; 52% women). The prevalence of disability increased from 28% (95% CI, 24%-31%) 2 years before death to 56% (95% CI, 52%-60%) in the last month of life. Those who died at the oldest ages were much more likely to have disability 2 years before death (ages 50-69 years, 14%; 70-79 years, 21%; 80-89 years, 32%; 90 years or more, 50%; P for trend, <.001). Disability was more common in women 2 years before death (32% [95% CI, 28%-36%]) than men (21% [95% CI, 18%-25%]; P < .001), even after adjustment for older age at death. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Those who live to an older age are likely to be disabled, and thus in need of caregiving assistance, many months or years prior to death. Women have a substantially longer period of end-of-life disability than men.
IMPORTANCE: Whereas many persons at advanced ages live independently and are free of disability, we know little about how likely older people are to be disabled in the basic activities of daily living that are necessary for independent living as they enter the last years of life. OBJECTIVE: To determine national estimates of disability during the last 2 years of life. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A nationally representative study of older adults in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants 50 years and older who died while enrolled in the Health and Retirement Study between 1995 and 2010. Each participant was interviewed once at a varying time point in the last 24 months of life. We used these interviews to calculate national estimates of the prevalence of disability across the 2 years prior to death. We modeled the prevalence of disability in the 2 years prior to death for groups defined by age at death and sex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Disability was defined as need for help with at least 1 of the following activities of daily living: dressing, bathing, eating, transferring, walking across the room, and using the toilet. RESULTS: There were 8232 decedents (mean [SD] age at death, 79 [11] years; 52% women). The prevalence of disability increased from 28% (95% CI, 24%-31%) 2 years before death to 56% (95% CI, 52%-60%) in the last month of life. Those who died at the oldest ages were much more likely to have disability 2 years before death (ages 50-69 years, 14%; 70-79 years, 21%; 80-89 years, 32%; 90 years or more, 50%; P for trend, <.001). Disability was more common in women 2 years before death (32% [95% CI, 28%-36%]) than men (21% [95% CI, 18%-25%]; P < .001), even after adjustment for older age at death. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Those who live to an older age are likely to be disabled, and thus in need of caregiving assistance, many months or years prior to death. Women have a substantially longer period of end-of-life disability than men.
Authors: Alexander Kulminski; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Igor Akushevich; Konstantin G Arbeev; Kenneth Land; Anatoli I Yashin Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2007-05-29 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Jun Zhao; Stephen Barclay; Morag Farquhar; Ann Louise Kinmonth; Carol Brayne; Jane Fleming Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: K E Covinsky; L Goldman; E F Cook; R Oye; N Desbiens; D Reding; W Fulkerson; A F Connors; J Lynn; R S Phillips Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-12-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michelle C Odden; William Jen Hoe Koh; Alice M Arnold; Andreea M Rawlings; Bruce M Psaty; Anne B Newman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Christophe Luthy; Christine Cedraschi; Anne-Françoise Allaz; François R Herrmann; Catherine Ludwig Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Claire K Ankuda; Katherine A Ornstein; Kenneth E Covinsky; Evan Bollens-Lund; Diane E Meier; Amy S Kelley Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jennifer M Reckrey; Emma K Tsui; R Sean Morrison; Emma T Geduldig; Robyn I Stone; Katherine A Ornstein; Alex D Federman Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: June R Lunney; Steven M Albert; Robert Boudreau; Diane Ives; Suzanne Satterfield; Anne B Newman; Tamara Harris Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Michele L Callisaya; Emmeline Ayers; Nir Barzilai; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Richard B Lipton; Petr Otahal; Velandai K Srikanth; Joe Verghese Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 4.472