Literature DB >> 23835820

Preventive services delivery in patients with chronic illnesses: parallel opportunities rather than competing obligations.

Steven M Ornstein1, Ruth G Jenkins, Cara B Litvin, Andrea M Wessell, Paul J Nietert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whether patients with 1 or more chronic illnesses are more or less likely to receive recommended preventive services is unclear and an important public health and health care system issue. We addressed this issue in a large national practice-based research network (PBRN) that maintains a longitudinal database derived from electronic health records.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study as of October 1, 2011, of the association between being up to date with 10 preventive services and the prevalence of 24 chronic illnesses among 667,379 active patients aged 18 years or older in 148 member practices in a national PBRN. We used generalized linear mixed models to assess for the association of being up to date with each preventive service as a function of the patient's number of chronic conditions, adjusted for patient age and encounter frequency.
RESULTS: Of the patients 65.4% had at least 1 of the 24 chronic illnesses. For 9 of the 10 preventive services there were strong associations between the odds of being up to date and the presence of chronic illness, even after adjustment for visit frequency and patient age. Odds ratios increased with the number of chronic conditions for 5 of the preventive services.
CONCLUSIONS: Rather than a barrier, the presence of chronic illness was positively associated with receipt of recommended preventive services in this large national PBRN. This finding supports the notion that modern primary care practice can effectively deliver preventive services to the growing number of patients with multiple chronic illnesses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic disease; comorbidity; preventive health services; primary health care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835820      PMCID: PMC3704494          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  12 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Patient outcomes at 26 months in the patient-centered medical home National Demonstration Project.

Authors:  Carlos Roberto Jaén; Robert L Ferrer; William L Miller; Raymond F Palmer; Robert Wood; Marivel Davila; Elizabeth E Stewart; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Implementation of evidence-based preventive services delivery processes in primary care: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study.

Authors:  James W Mold; Cheryl A Aspy; Zsolt Nagykaldi
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Patterns of preventive health services in rheumatoid arthritis patients compared to a primary care patient population.

Authors:  Androniki Bili; Lisa L Schroeder; Lindsay J Ledwich; H Lester Kirchner; Eric D Newman; Mary Chester M Wasko
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Implementing and evaluating electronic standing orders in primary care practice: a PPRNet study.

Authors:  Lynne S Nemeth; Steven M Ornstein; Ruth G Jenkins; Andrea M Wessell; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Opportunistic preventive services delivery. Are time limitations and patient satisfaction barriers?

Authors:  K C Stange; S A Flocke; M A Goodwin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Principles of the patient-centered medical home and preventive services delivery.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Shawna V Hudson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Predictors of osteoporosis screening completion rates in a primary care practice.

Authors:  Ramona S DeJesus; Rajeev Chaudhry; Kurt B Angstman; Stephen S Cha; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Rebecca L Kesman; Matthew E Bernard; Robert J Stroebel
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 9.  Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  C R Jaén; K C Stange; P A Nutting
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  The delivery of preventive services in primary care practices according to chronic disease status.

Authors:  S A Fontana; L C Baumann; C Helberg; R R Love
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  6 in total

1.  In this issue: a diversified portfolio.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Utilization of Preventive Health Care in Adults and Children With Eczema.

Authors:  Mark A Strom; Jonathan I Silverberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.

Authors:  Justine P Wu; Laura J Damschroder; Michael D Fetters; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Benjamin F Crabtree; Shawna V Hudson; Mack T Ruffin; Juliana Fucinari; Minji Kang; L Susan Taichman; John W Creswell
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-04-18

4.  Barriers to healthcare access for Arabic-speaking population in an English-speaking country.

Authors:  Ali A Al-Jumaili; Kawther K Ahmed; Dave Koch
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2020-05-15

5.  Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey.

Authors:  Panayotis Constantinou; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Daniela Katz; Angela J Tengekyon; Natan R Kahan; Ronit Calderon-Margalit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.