Literature DB >> 21506729

Predictors of osteoporosis screening completion rates in a primary care practice.

Ramona S DeJesus1, Rajeev Chaudhry, Kurt B Angstman, Stephen S Cha, Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel, Rebecca L Kesman, Matthew E Bernard, Robert J Stroebel.   

Abstract

The United States Preventive Services Task Force and the National Osteoporosis Foundation recommend routine osteoporosis screening for women aged 65 years or older. Previous studies have shown that the use of a clinical decision-support tool significantly improves screening rates. In a recently published study, a statistically significant improvement was found in the screening rates for eligible women with use of the tool. To evaluate whether a clinical decision-support tool independently predicts completion of osteoporosis screening tests and to identify predictors of screening completion, we examined the records of 2462 female patients who were eligible for osteoporosis screening but had no prior baseline screening and who were seen in our primary care practices in 2007 and 2008. Patient and provider characteristics and clinic visit type were identified, and their association with screening test completion was statistically analyzed using both univariate and multivariate models. Screening completion rates increased significantly from 2007 to 2008. Factors associated with increased likelihood of screening completion included race, marital status, residence, presence of comorbidity (cancer, rheumatologic disease), and the year and type of visit. Screening was less likely for women aged 80 years or older. The use of a point-of-care decision-support tool not only improved osteoporosis screening rates significantly but appeared to be an independent predictor of screening completion. It potentially can facilitate the systematic and effective delivery of preventive health services to patients in the primary care setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21506729      PMCID: PMC3186710          DOI: 10.1089/pop.2010.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Health Manag        ISSN: 1942-7891            Impact factor:   2.459


  10 in total

1.  A multicenter cross sectional study on bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis. Italian Study Group on Bone Mass in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  L Sinigaglia; A Nervetti; Q Mela; G Bianchi; A Del Puente; O Di Munno; B Frediani; F Cantatore; R Pellerito; S Bartolone; G La Montagna; S Adami
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Missed opportunities for prevention of osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  Teresa C Gallagher; Olga Geling; Florence Comite
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-02-25

4.  Predictors of falls among postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA).

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; T W Weiss; C A McHorney; P D Miller; E S Siris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Clinical decision support tools for osteoporosis disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Monika Kastner; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Osteoporosis: evaluation of screening patterns in a primary-care group practice.

Authors:  Kenneth Cohen; Diana Maier
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Overcoming barriers to osteoporosis care in vulnerable elderly patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  Julie A Switzer; Susan Jaglal; Earl R Bogoch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Use of a clinical decision support system to increase osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  Ramona S DeJesus; Kurt B Angstman; Rebecca Kesman; Robert J Stroebel; Matthew E Bernard; Sidna M Scheitel; Vicki L Hunt; Ahmed S Rahman; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Effect of visit length and a clinical decision support tool on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in a primary care practice.

Authors:  John Eaton; Darcy Reed; Kurt B Angstman; Kris Thomas; Frederick North; Robert Stroebel; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.431

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening: Addition of Quantitative CT Bone Mineral Density Evaluation to CT Colonography.

Authors:  Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Neil Binkley; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Perception, knowledge, and use by general practitioners of Belgium of a new WHO tool (FRAX) to assess the 10-year probability of fracture.

Authors:  O Bruyère; D Nicolet; S Compère; V Rabenda; P Jeholet; B Zegels; P Maassen; G Pire; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Preventive services delivery in patients with chronic illnesses: parallel opportunities rather than competing obligations.

Authors:  Steven M Ornstein; Ruth G Jenkins; Cara B Litvin; Andrea M Wessell; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Osteoporosis treatment disparities: a 6-year aggregate analysis from national survey data.

Authors:  T D Cunningham; B S Di Pace; J Ullal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Variation in Patient Experience Across the Clinic Day: a Multilevel Assessment of Four Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Lindsey M Philpot; Bushra A Khokhar; Jordan K Rosedahl; Tiffany A Sinclair; Rajeev Chaudhry; Jon O Ebbert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.