Crystal Edler Schiller1, Jared Minkel2, Moria J Smoski3, Gabriel S Dichter4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States. Electronic address: crystal_schiller@med.unc.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States; Duke-UNC Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major depression (MDD) is characterized by anhedonia. Although a growing body of literature has linked anhedonia in MDD to reduced frontostriatal activity during reward gains, relatively few studies have examined neural responsivity to loss, and no studies to date have examined neural responses to loss in euthymic individuals with a history of MDD. METHODS: An fMRI monetary incentive delay task was administered to 19 participants with remitted MDD (rMDD) and 19 never depressed controls. Analyses examined group activation differences in brain reward circuitry during monetary loss anticipation and outcomes. Secondary analyses examined the association between self-reported rumination and brain activation in the rMDD group. RESULTS: Compared to controls, the rMDD group showed less superior frontal gyrus activation during loss anticipation and less inferior and superior frontal gyri activation during loss outcomes (cluster corrected p's<.05). Ruminative Responses Scale scores were negatively correlated with superior frontal gyrus activation (r=-.68, p=.001) during loss outcomes in the rMDD group. LIMITATIONS: Replication with a larger sample is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Euthymic individuals with a history of MDD showed prefrontal cortex hypoactivation during loss anticipation and outcomes, and the degree of superior frontal gyrus hypoactivation was associated with rumination. Abnormal prefrontal cortex responses to loss may reflect a trait-like vulnerability to MDD, although future research is needed to evaluate the utility of this functional neural endophenotype as a prospective risk marker.
BACKGROUND:Major depression (MDD) is characterized by anhedonia. Although a growing body of literature has linked anhedonia in MDD to reduced frontostriatal activity during reward gains, relatively few studies have examined neural responsivity to loss, and no studies to date have examined neural responses to loss in euthymic individuals with a history of MDD. METHODS: An fMRI monetary incentive delay task was administered to 19 participants with remitted MDD (rMDD) and 19 never depressed controls. Analyses examined group activation differences in brain reward circuitry during monetary loss anticipation and outcomes. Secondary analyses examined the association between self-reported rumination and brain activation in the rMDD group. RESULTS: Compared to controls, the rMDD group showed less superior frontal gyrus activation during loss anticipation and less inferior and superior frontal gyri activation during loss outcomes (cluster corrected p's<.05). Ruminative Responses Scale scores were negatively correlated with superior frontal gyrus activation (r=-.68, p=.001) during loss outcomes in the rMDD group. LIMITATIONS: Replication with a larger sample is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Euthymic individuals with a history of MDD showed prefrontal cortex hypoactivation during loss anticipation and outcomes, and the degree of superior frontal gyrus hypoactivation was associated with rumination. Abnormal prefrontal cortex responses to loss may reflect a trait-like vulnerability to MDD, although future research is needed to evaluate the utility of this functional neural endophenotype as a prospective risk marker.
Authors: Georg Northoff; Alexander Heinzel; Felix Bermpohl; Robert Niese; Andrea Pfennig; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Gottfried Schlaug Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jill M Hooley; Staci A Gruber; Holly A Parker; Julien Guillaumot; Jadwiga Rogowska; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jennifer L Stewart; Evan J White; Rayus Kuplicki; Elisabeth Akeman; Jerzy Bodurka; Yoon-Hee Cha; Justin S Feinstein; Sahib S Khalsa; Jonathan B Savitz; Teresa A Victor; Martin P Paulus; Robin L Aupperle Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Katharine Dunlop; Sakina J Rizvi; Sidney H Kennedy; Stefanie Hassel; Stephen C Strother; Jacqueline K Harris; Mojdeh Zamyadi; Stephen R Arnott; Andrew D Davis; Farrokh Mansouri; Laura Schulze; Amanda K Ceniti; Raymond W Lam; Roumen Milev; Susan Rotzinger; Jane A Foster; Benicio N Frey; Sagar V Parikh; Claudio N Soares; Rudolf Uher; Gustavo Turecki; Glenda M MacQueen; Jonathan Downar Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Hanna Keren; Georgia O'Callaghan; Pablo Vidal-Ribas; George A Buzzell; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft; Pedro M Pan; Liana Meffert; Ariela Kaiser; Selina Wolke; Daniel S Pine; Argyris Stringaris Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Nenad Vasic; Nadine D Wolf; Georg Grön; Zrinka Sosic-Vasic; Bernhard J Connemann; Fabio Sambataro; Anna von Strombeck; Dirk Lang; Stefanie Otte; Manuela Dudek; Robert C Wolf Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Katherine R Luking; David Pagliaccio; Joan L Luby; Deanna M Barch Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 8.829