Evanthia Galanis 1 , S Keith Anderson , Jackie M Lafky , Joon H Uhm , Caterina Giannini , Shaji K Kumar , Teresa K Kimlinger , Donald W Northfelt , Patrick J Flynn , Kurt A Jaeckle , Timothy J Kaufmann , Jan C Buckner . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: We hypothesized that vertical blockade of VEGF signaling by combining bevacizumab with sorafenib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma would result in a synergistic therapeutic effect. We also investigated whether VEGF, VEGFR2 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), circulating biomarkers of angiogenesis, and MRI markers such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are correlated with treatment efficacy and/or toxicity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with sorafenib (200 mg twice a day, weekly, days 1-5; group A). Due to toxicity, the starting sorafenib dose was subsequently modified to 200 mg every day (group B). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 19 patients in group A and 35 in group B. Objective response rate was 18.5% with median duration of 6.7 months (range 0.5-24.1 months). Six-month progression-free survival (PFS6) was 20.4% (11/54), and median overall survival (OS) was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.7-8.2]; outcome was similar between the two dose groups. We identified SNPs in the VEGF and VEGFR2 promoter regions, which were associated with PFS6 (P<0.022). Among molecular markers of angiogenesis, a higher log2 baseline level of stromal cell-derived factor-1 was associated with PFS6 success (P=0.04). Circulating endothelial cells decreased during treatment with subsequent increase at disease progression (P=0.022). Imaging analysis showed a trend associating ADC-L with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The bevacizumab/sorafenib combination did not improve outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma versus historic bevacizumab-treated controls. Biologic markers of response and resistance to bevacizumab in gliomas were identified which merit prospective validation. ©2013 AACR.
PURPOSE: We hypothesized that vertical blockade of VEGF signaling by combining bevacizumab with sorafenib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma would result in a synergistic therapeutic effect. We also investigated whether VEGF , VEGFR2 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), circulating biomarkers of angiogenesis, and MRI markers such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are correlated with treatment efficacy and/or toxicity . EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with sorafenib (200 mg twice a day, weekly, days 1-5; group A). Due to toxicity , the starting sorafenib dose was subsequently modified to 200 mg every day (group B). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 19 patients in group A and 35 in group B. Objective response rate was 18.5% with median duration of 6.7 months (range 0.5-24.1 months). Six-month progression-free survival (PFS6) was 20.4% (11/54), and median overall survival (OS) was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.7-8.2]; outcome was similar between the two dose groups. We identified SNPs in the VEGF and VEGFR2 promoter regions, which were associated with PFS6 (P<0.022). Among molecular markers of angiogenesis, a higher log2 baseline level of stromal cell-derived factor-1 was associated with PFS6 success (P=0.04). Circulating endothelial cells decreased during treatment with subsequent increase at disease progression (P=0.022). Imaging analysis showed a trend associating ADC-L with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The bevacizumab /sorafenib combination did not improve outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma versus historic bevacizumab -treated controls. Biologic markers of response and resistance to bevacizumab in gliomas were identified which merit prospective validation. ©2013 AACR.
Entities: CellLine
Chemical
Disease
Gene
Mutation
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2013
PMID: 23833308 PMCID: PMC3869574 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 1078-0432 Impact factor: 12.531