Literature DB >> 11306150

A three-outcome design for phase II clinical trials.

D J Sargent1, V Chan, R M Goldberg.   

Abstract

The goal of a phase II trial is to make a preliminary determination regarding the activity and tolerability of a new treatment and thus to determine whether the treatment warrants further study in the phase III setting. Phase II clinical trials are typically designed in the hypothesis testing framework with two possible outcomes, either reject the null hypothesis H(0) or reject the alternative hypothesis H(a), based on the observed activity level. However, in cases where the observed activity is "borderline," the decision regarding the future of the agent is not as clear as the prespecified hypothesis test would indicate. In this paper we propose an alternative design that allows for three outcomes: reject H(0), reject H(a), or reject neither. We describe the theoretical properties of this design and illustrate it with several examples. We focus on the clinical implications of the three-outcome design. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:117-125

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11306150     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00115-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  23 in total

1.  A multiinstitutional phase 2 trial of pazopanib monotherapy in advanced anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Keith C Bible; Vera J Suman; Michael E Menefee; Robert C Smallridge; Julian R Molina; William J Maples; Nina J Karlin; Anne M Traynor; Priya Kumar; Boon Cher Goh; Wan-Teck Lim; Ayoko R Bossou; Crescent R Isham; Kevin P Webster; Andrea K Kukla; Carolyn Bieber; Jill K Burton; Pamela Harris; Charles Erlichman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  A Phase II Study of Pazopanib in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: NCCTG N0623 (Alliance).

Authors:  Kaushal Parikh; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Katie Allen-Ziegler; Brandt Esplin; Angelina D Tan; Benjamin Marchello; Alex A Adjei; Julian R Molina
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-24

3.  Approaches to handling data when a phase II trial deviates from the pre-specified Simon's two-stage design.

Authors:  Yujun Wu; Weichung J Shih
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Point/counterpoint: randomized versus single-arm phase II clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Stuart A Grossman; Karisa C Schreck; Karla Ballman; Brian Alexander
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543 (Alliance): A phase 2 trial of pharmacogenetic-based dosing of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Robert R McWilliams; Nathan R Foster; Michelle R Mahoney; Thomas C Smyrk; Joseph A Murray; Matthew M Ames; L Elise Horvath; Daniel J Schneider; Timothy J Hobday; Aminah Jatoi; Jeffrey P Meyers; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Randomized phase IIB evaluation of weekly paclitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel with oncolytic reovirus (Reolysin®) in recurrent ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  David E Cohn; Michael W Sill; Joan L Walker; David O'Malley; Christa I Nagel; Teresa L Rutledge; William Bradley; Debra L Richardson; Katherine M Moxley; Carol Aghajanian
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Combination Epigenetic Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer with 5-Azacitidine and Entinostat: A Phase II National Cancer Institute/Stand Up to Cancer Study.

Authors:  Roisin M Connolly; Huili Li; Rachel C Jankowitz; Zhe Zhang; Michelle A Rudek; Stacie C Jeter; Shannon A Slater; Penny Powers; Antonio C Wolff; John H Fetting; Adam Brufsky; Richard Piekarz; Nita Ahuja; Peter W Laird; Hui Shen; Daniel J Weisenberger; Leslie Cope; James G Herman; George Somlo; Agustin A Garcia; Peter A Jones; Stephen B Baylin; Nancy E Davidson; Cynthia A Zahnow; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  A phase II study of cetuximab and radiation in elderly and/or poor performance status patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (N0422).

Authors:  A Jatoi; S E Schild; N Foster; G T Henning; K J Dornfeld; P J Flynn; T R Fitch; S R Dakhil; K M Rowland; P J Stella; G S Soori; A A Adjei
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  A phase 2 consortium (P2C) trial of 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP) for advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Steven Attia; Jill Kolesar; Michelle R Mahoney; Henry C Pitot; Daniel Laheru; James Heun; Wei Huang; Jens Eickhoff; Charles Erlichman; Kyle D Holen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 10.  Targeting MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard J Lee; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.