| Literature DB >> 23832652 |
Ewa D Raczyńska1, Beata Kamińska.
Abstract
Quantum-chemical calculations were performed for all possible nine neutral tautomers of purine and their oxidized and reduced forms in water {PCM//DFT(B3LYP)/6-311+G(d,p)} and compared to those in the gas phase {DFT(B3LYP)/6-311+G(d,p)}. PCM hydration influences geometries, π-electron delocalization, and relative energies of purine tautomers in different ways. Generally, the harmonic oscillator model of electron delocalization (HOMED) indices increase when proceeding from the gas phase to aequeous solution for the neutral and redox forms of purine. Their changes for the neutral and oxidized tautomers are almost parallel to the relative energies showing that aromaticity plays an important role in the tautomeric preferences. Tautomeric stabilities and tautomeric preferences vary when proceeding from the gas phase to water indicating additionally that intra- and intermolecular interactions affect tautomeric equilibria. The tautomeric mixture of neutral purine in the gas phase consists mainly of the N9H tautomer, whereas two tautomers (N9H and N7H) dominate in water. For oxidized purine, N9H is favored in the gas phase, whereas N1H in water. A gain of one electron dramatically changes the relative stabilities of the CH and NH tautomers that C6H and C8H dominate in the tautomeric mixture in the gas phase, whereas N3H in water. These variations show exceptional sensitivity of the tautomeric purine system on environment in the electron-transfer reactions.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23832652 PMCID: PMC3744648 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-013-1926-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Model ISSN: 0948-5023 Impact factor: 1.810
Fig. 1Prototropic tautomers for purine (the labile proton marked in bold)
The rHOMA indices for imidazole (5 bonds), pyrimidine (6 bonds) and purine system (10 bonds) of neutral and redox tautomers of purine calculated in water at the PCM(water)//B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level and in the gas phase at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level (data in italic)
| Neutral form | Radical cation | Radical anion | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isomer | 5 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
|
| 0.788 | 0.812 | 0.865 | 0.598 | 0.829 | 0.774 | 0.912 | 0.758 | 0.825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.314 | 0.073 | 0.300 | −0.322 | −0.631 | −0.156 | 0.809 | 0.296 | 0.544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.835 | 0.888 | 0.900 | 0.641 | 0.824 | 0.796 | 0.929 | 0.783 | 0.839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| −0.035 | 0.035 | 0.146 | −0.973 | −0.813 | −0.381 | −0.083 | 0.185 | 0.304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.023 | −0.146 | 0.081 | 0.169 | −0.138 | 0.180 | −0.176 | −0.188 | 0.089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.188 | −0.189 | 0.138 | −0.452 | −0.906 | −0.320 | 0.864 | 0.214 | 0.498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.881 | 0.965 | 0.938 | 0.882 | 0.922 | 0.935 | 0.880 | 0.870 | 0.874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.089 | 0.420 | 0.353 | −0.323 | −0.015 | 0.053 | 0.028 | 0.698 | 0.489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.861 | 0.970 | 0.929 | 0.844 | 0.903 | 0.913 | 0.888 | 0.848 | 0.858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The rHOMA indices estimated according to Eq. (3) using the following α and R o (in Å): 257.7 and 1.388 for CC, and 93.52 and 1.334 for CN [52]
Comparison of the HOMED indices for imidazole (5 bonds), pyrimidine (6 bonds) and purine system (10 bonds) of neutral and redox tautomers of purine estimated in water at the PCM(water)//B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level with those found in the gas phase at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level (data in italic)
| Neutral form | Radical cation | Radical anion | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isomer | 5 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
|
| 0.927 | 0.923 | 0.934 | 0.758 | 0.951 | 0.854 | 0.951 | 0.817 | 0.865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.656 | 0.424 | 0.519 | 0.435 | 0.152 | 0.321 | 0.921 | 0.444 | 0.637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.927 | 0.953 | 0.943 | 0.797 | 0.943 | 0.872 | 0.951 | 0.855 | 0.885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.411 | 0.474 | 0.423 | 0.114 | 0.212 | 0.248 | 0.476 | 0.595 | 0.562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.473 | 0.543 | 0.505 | 0.626 | 0.606 | 0.635 | 0.456 | 0.633 | 0.592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.616 | 0.369 | 0.480 | 0.397 | 0.152 | 0.323 | 0.936 | 0.568 | 0.713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.928 | 0.991 | 0.963 | 0.956 | 0.974 | 0.968 | 0.920 | 0.904 | 0.899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.418 | 0.731 | 0.554 | 0.252 | 0.556 | 0.409 | 0.363 | 0.906 | 0.630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.907 | 0.993 | 0.947 | 0.934 | 0.969 | 0.955 | 0.919 | 0.911 | 0.902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fig. 2rHOMA vs HOMED (DFT) for the imidazole (blue points) and pyrimidine (red points) rings, and for the whole purine system (green points) of the neutral (a), oxidized (b), and reduced (c) purine isomers
The DFT (gas) and PCM (water) relative energies (in kcal mol−1 at 0 K) calculated for the neutral and redox forms of purine
| Neutral form | Radical cation | Radical anion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isomer | DFT | PCM | DFT | PCM | DFT | PCM |
|
| 13.1 | 4.4 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 11.3 | 1.4 |
|
| 44.0 | 48.5 | 49.1 | 53.4 | 5.0 | 5.8 |
|
| 9.9 | 6.6 | 9.4 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 0.0 |
|
| 54.2 | 57.1 | 58.9 | 60.2 | 16.6 | 17.7 |
|
| 47.7 | 49.6 | 57.0 | 56.6 | 14.3 | 15.2 |
|
| 46.4 | 50.5 | 53.6 | 57.9 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
|
| 4.0 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 9.8 | 2.8 |
|
| 40.1 | 44.5 | 47.1 | 51.7 | 0.6 | 2.2 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 8.2 | 4.4 |
Fig. 3HOMED(10) vs ΔE (in kcal mol−1) for the neutral purine isomers in the gas phase (a) and in water (b)
The DFT (gas) and PCM (water) adiabatic ionization potentials and adiabatic electron affinities (IP and EA, respectively, in eV) calculated for individual tautomers of purine in their equilibrium ground electronic states
| IP | EA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tautomer | DFT | PCM | DFT | PCM |
|
| 8.80 | 6.71 | 0.44 | 2.41 |
|
| 9.24 | 7.12 | 2.06 | 4.13 |
|
| 9.00 | 6.80 | 0.66 | 2.56 |
|
| 9.22 | 7.04 | 2.00 | 3.99 |
|
| 9.42 | 7.21 | 1.81 | 3.76 |
|
| 9.33 | 7.23 | 2.38 | 4.42 |
|
| 8.97 | 7.00 | 0.12 | 2.16 |
|
| 9.32 | 7.22 | 2.08 | 4.11 |
|
| 9.02 | 6.98 | 0.01 | 2.09 |