Olusola Ajilore1, Melissa Lamar2, Alex Leow2, Aifeng Zhang2, Shaolin Yang3, Anand Kumar2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: oajilore@psych.uic.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Late-life major depression (LLD) is characterized by distinct epidemiologic and psychosocial factors, as well as medical comorbidities that are associated with specific neuroanatomical differences. The purpose of this study was to use interregional correlations of cortical and subcortical volumes to examine cortical-subcortical structural network properties in subjects with LLD compared with healthy comparison subjects. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional neuroimaging study conducted in the general community. We recruited 73 healthy elderly comparison subjects and 53 subjects with LLD who volunteered in response to advertisements. Brain network connectivity measures were generated by correlating regional volumes after controlling for age, gender, and intracranial volume by using the Brain Connectivity Toolbox. RESULTS: Results for overall network strength revealed that LLD networks showed a greater magnitude of associations for both positive and negative correlation weights compared with healthy elderly networks. LLD networks also demonstrated alterations in brain network structure compared with healthy comparison subjects. LLD networks were also more vulnerable to targeted attacks compared with healthy elderly comparison subjects, and this vulnerability was attenuated when controlling for white matter alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrates that cortical-subcortical network properties are altered in LLD and may reflect the underlying neuroanatomical vulnerabilities of the disorder.
OBJECTIVES: Late-life major depression (LLD) is characterized by distinct epidemiologic and psychosocial factors, as well as medical comorbidities that are associated with specific neuroanatomical differences. The purpose of this study was to use interregional correlations of cortical and subcortical volumes to examine cortical-subcortical structural network properties in subjects with LLD compared with healthy comparison subjects. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional neuroimaging study conducted in the general community. We recruited 73 healthy elderly comparison subjects and 53 subjects with LLD who volunteered in response to advertisements. Brain network connectivity measures were generated by correlating regional volumes after controlling for age, gender, and intracranial volume by using the Brain Connectivity Toolbox. RESULTS: Results for overall network strength revealed that LLD networks showed a greater magnitude of associations for both positive and negative correlation weights compared with healthy elderly networks. LLD networks also demonstrated alterations in brain network structure compared with healthy comparison subjects. LLD networks were also more vulnerable to targeted attacks compared with healthy elderly comparison subjects, and this vulnerability was attenuated when controlling for white matter alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrates that cortical-subcortical network properties are altered in LLD and may reflect the underlying neuroanatomical vulnerabilities of the disorder.
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Bruce Fischl; André van der Kouwe; Christophe Destrieux; Eric Halgren; Florent Ségonne; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Larry J Seidman; Jill Goldstein; David Kennedy; Verne Caviness; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: George S Alexopoulos; Dimitris N Kiosses; Steven J Choi; Christopher F Murphy; Kelvin O Lim Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Anand Kumar; Rakesh C Gupta; M Albert Thomas; Jeffry Alger; Nathaniel Wyckoff; Sun Hwang Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Wenjun Li; B Douglas Ward; Xiaolin Liu; Gang Chen; Jennifer L Jones; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Taolin Chen; Keith M Kendrick; Jinhui Wang; Min Wu; Kaiming Li; Xiaoqi Huang; Yuejia Luo; Su Lui; John A Sweeney; Qiyong Gong Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Benoit H Mulsant; Aristotle N Voineskos; Neda Rashidi-Ranjbar; Tarek K Rajji; Sanjeev Kumar; Nathan Herrmann; Linda Mah; Alastair J Flint; Corinne E Fischer; Meryl A Butters; Bruce G Pollock; Erin W Dickie; John A E Anderson Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Meenal J Patel; Carmen Andreescu; Julie C Price; Kathryn L Edelman; Charles F Reynolds; Howard J Aizenstein Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 3.485