Literature DB >> 23828724

Electronic Double-Quantum Coherences and Their Impact on Ultrafast Spectroscopy: The Example of β-Carotene.

Niklas Christensson1, Franz Milota, Alexandra Nemeth, Igor Pugliesi, Eberhard Riedle, Jaroslaw Sperling, Tõnu Pullerits, Harald F Kauffmann, Jürgen Hauer.   

Abstract

The energy level structure and dynamics of biomolecules are important for understanding their photoinduced function. In particular, the role of carotenoids in light-harvesting is heavily studied, yet not fully understood. The conventional approach to investigate these processes involves analysis of the third-order optical polarization in one spectral dimension. Here, we record two-dimensional correlation spectra for different time-orderings to characterize all components of the transient molecular polarization and the optical signal. Single- and double-quantum two-dimensional experiments provide insight into the energy level structure as well as the ultrafast dynamics of solvated β-carotene. By analysis of the lineshapes, we obtain the transition energy and characterize the potential energy surfaces of the involved states. We obtain direct experimental proof for an excited state absorption transition in the visible (S2→Sn2). The signatures of this transition in pump-probe transients are shown to lead to strongly damped oscillations with characteristic pump and probe frequency dependence.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 23828724      PMCID: PMC3698132          DOI: 10.1021/jz101409r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-7185            Impact factor:   6.475


Carotenoids are a family of pigments with important biological functions ranging from dynamic photoprotection and singlet oxygen scavenging to utilization of blue-green light in photosynthesis.[1] The excited-state electronic structure and dynamics of carotenoids are intimately related to their function and have therefore been studied extensively. If a carotenoid is excited with light, the initially prepared excited state S2 (1Bu) decays toward the lowest excited, optically dark state S1 (2Ag) on a chain length-dependent, sub-200 fs time scale.[1] Several optically dark states have been predicted theoretically and proposed to participate as intermediates in this internal conversion process.[2] Despite the use of ever shorter pulses in pump−probe experiments,[3,4] no unified picture of carotenoid’s energy deactivation network has emerged yet.[2,5−8] A similar situation is found for many molecules of biological and chemical interest. This calls for new experimental techniques disentangling the various contributions to the third-order optical response. One approach is to resolve the induced polarization in excitation frequency. This is achieved in single-quantum two-dimensional spectroscopy (1Q-2D)[9,10] by correlating coherence evolutions during the first and third time interval of a four-wave mixing sequence. The combination of high spectral and temporal resolution, the capacity of extracting correlation functions, and the reduced spectral congestion are the key advantages of 1Q-2D over pump−probe. Nevertheless, 1Q-2D still interrogates the same contributions to the third-order optical polarization as pump−probe. To further refine the understanding of the excited state dynamics, it is therefore desirable to employ methods that probe specific Liouville pathways. In this work we introduce double-quantum two-dimensional spectroscopy (2Q-2D)[11−14] to selectively probe a state above S2 with an excited state absorption (ESA) transition (S2→Sn2) in the visible spectral range. The 2Q-2D experiment singles out Liouville pathways that involve Sn2 and is insensitive to stimulated emission (SE) and ground-state bleach (GSB). Properly characterizing ESA from S2 is important for understanding the complex interplay of ultrafast optical responses in carotenoids.[6,13,14] Previous pump−probe experiments have revealed an ESA transition from S2 in the near-infrared spectral range.[15] In the visible, such direct assignment is more complicated due to pronounced vibrational wave packet motion,[16] evolving Stokes shift and the overlap of GSB, SE, and the rising ESA from S1. We measure and discuss a 2Q-2D signal in β-carotene that gives direct experimental proof for an S2→Sn2 ESA transition in this spectrally congested region. This contribution directly affects the excited state dynamics of carotenoids and therefore has to be included in the analysis of other third-order optical experiments. By analyzing the line shapes of the 1Q-2D and 2Q-2D spectra, we investigate the potential energy surface (PES) of Sn2 and the correlation of spectral motions in the different electronic states S0, S2, and Sn2. The employed experimental techniques for the study of higher lying excited states is not specific for carotenoids, and many other systems are expected to benefit from analogous investigations. 1Q-2D and 2Q-2D investigate different components of the third-order polarization and must be discussed on a common footing in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the total nonlinear response. The different signal contributions in the kS = −k1+23 phase matching direction for a three-level-system including S0, S2, and Sn2 are illustrated by the Feynman diagrams in Figure 1a−c. The wave vector index refers to a given pulse in the experiment and not to the order in which the pulses arrive at the sample. We define t1 as the delay between the first and the second pulse and t2 as that between the second and third.[17]t3 denotes the delay between the third pulse and the signal field.
Figure 1

Double-sided Feynman diagrams representing contributions to the third-order optical response of a three-level system S0, S2, and Sn2. The GSB, SE, and ESA are depicted (a) for the rephasing and (b) for the nonrephasing pulse order. (c) DQC pathways.

The ordering of the conjugate field (i.e., −k1) in the pulse sequence defines three different experimental signals: SI (time order 1−2−3) and SII (2−1−3) correspond to the well-known rephasing and nonrephasing signals. The 1Q-2D spectrum S1Q2D(ω1, t2, ω3) at a given t2 is obtained by Fourier-transformation along t1 of the signal field emitted during t3, and by adding SI and SII contributions. For the SIII signal, three consecutive energy levels with comparable energy separation are a necessary prerequisite. Double-quantum coherences (DQC) can be induced in such a system if the conjugate field interacts last in the pulse sequence (time order 2−3−1). This time ordering corresponds to negative delays in pump−probe. The Feynman diagrams contributing to SIII are depicted in Figure 1c. These pathways, unlike the ones in Figure 1a,b, evolve in a |Sn2⟩⟨S0|-DQC during t2 and oscillate at roughly twice the single-quantum coherence frequency. The SIII measurement is carried out for a given t1 by scanning t2 and detecting the signal field during t3. The corresponding 2Q-2D signal S2Q2D(t1 = 0, ω2, ω3) is then obtained via a Fourier-transformation over t2. Double-sided Feynman diagrams representing contributions to the third-order optical response of a three-level system S0, S2, and Sn2. The GSB, SE, and ESA are depicted (a) for the rephasing and (b) for the nonrephasing pulse order. (c) DQC pathways. The experimental layout enabling both 1Q- and 2Q-2D measurements in the folded boxcar geometry has been described in detail previously.[13,18] 1Q-2D and 2Q-2D experiments were carried out using pulses of 1280 cm−1 full width at half-maximum (fwhm) bandwidth centered at 18350 cm−1 (545 nm). The pulses were compressed to a duration of 16 fs fwhm using a combination of prism compressor and chirped mirrors. Figure 2a shows the real part of the measured 1Q-2D spectrum of β-carotene at t2 = 0 fs, while simulations are shown in Figure 2b. The 1Q-2D spectrum displays a major positive contribution due to GSB and SE located at ω1 = ω3 = 18500 cm−1. In addition, there is a smaller positive contribution red-shifted along ω3 from the GSB. This feature can be identified as the ground-state wave packet of the 1150 cm−1 mode based on its energetic position and oscillatory motion during t2.[19] One can also observe a negative feature between the two positive contributions. Due to the tilt of the spectrum, this component is almost absent in the projection of the 1Q-2D signal onto ω3, i.e. the spectrally resolved pump−probe signal.[10] This negative feature is already an indication of ESA from S2. However, it cannot serve as direct proof for the existence of Sn2 because negative components in the 1Q-2D spectrum can appear already for a two-level system coupled to high-frequency vibrational modes[20] or for strong system−bath interaction.[21]
Figure 2

Experimental and simulated 1Q-2D at t2 = 0 fs (a,b) and 2Q-2D spectra at t1 = 0 fs (c,d). Red (blue) lines indicate positive (negative) signals. Lines are drawn with 10% increments, and all spectra are normalized to their respective maximum absolute value. Nodal lines (lines of zero intensity) are dashed.

To obtain a signal probing Sn2 directly, we turn to the 2Q-2D experiment. The measured spectrum shown in Figure 2c (simulations in Figure 2d) was recorded at t1 = 0 fs and reveals two oppositely signed features corresponding to the two Feynman diagrams in Figure 1c. The negative feature is located at lower ω3 showing that the energy of Sn2 is less than twice the GSB transition energy. The 2Q-2D spectrum does not display the characteristic antidiagonal elongation as seen for quantum wells[11,17] or as predicted for 2Q-2D spectra in the homogeneous limit. This implies that the correlated bath motions during different time periods need to be taken into account in the analysis of the experimental results.[13] Experimental and simulated 1Q-2D at t2 = 0 fs (a,b) and 2Q-2D spectra at t1 = 0 fs (c,d). Red (blue) lines indicate positive (negative) signals. Lines are drawn with 10% increments, and all spectra are normalized to their respective maximum absolute value. Nodal lines (lines of zero intensity) are dashed. On the basis of third-order perturbation theory, we simulate our measurements to extract the additional information in the lineshapes of the 1Q- and 2Q-2D spectra. In the limit of δ-pulse excitation, time ordering defines the contributions to a given experiment as laid out in the discussion of Figure 1. For finite pulses, one must consider the contributions from all orderings and delays of the electric field interactions (ta, tb, tc) permitted by the electric field envelopes. Therefore, an experiment with finite pulses has contributions from Liouville pathways that are not accessible in the impulsive limit. This means that the DQC pathways (Figure 1c) will contribute to the 1Q-2D signal just as single quantum pathways (Figure 1a,b) will affect 2Q-2D spectra during pulse overlap. To accurately account for the pulse overlap effects in the simulations, we used the electric fields obtained from a frequency-resolved optical gating experiment.[22] Our β-carotene model is based on a three-level system coupled to a heat bath. The model employs the second-order cumulant expansion to account for the correlation of bath fluctuations during different time intervals.[13,19,23] The simulations allow us to determine the properties of the S2→Sn2 transition and its coupling to the bath. We used a vertical transition energy of ωSn2 = 15 550 cm−1. The bath consists of three overdamped modes, τG = 40 fs, λGS2 = 90 cm−1, τE1 = 150 fs, λE1S2 = 180 cm−1, and τE2 = 150 fs, λE2S2 = 450 cm−1, where τ is the characteristic time of the mode, λ is the reorganization energy, and G and E refer to Gaussian and exponential components, respectively. The high frequency vibrational modes are modeled with two under-damped oscillators,νv1 = 1520 cm−1, λv1S = 960 cm−1 and νv2 = 1150 cm−1, λv2S2 = 571 cm−1. The lifetime of S2 was set to 150 fs according to the experimental finding. Figure 3 shows a sketch of the PESs for the three levels S0, S2, and Sn2 along a generalized coordinate q together with definitions of the transitions energies, displacements, and reorganization energies. For the PES of Sn2 we used significantly smaller displacements of both the overdamped modes, , and the vibrational modes, . Our results show that the spectral fluctuations of Sn2 and S2 are only partially correlated, i.e., 0 < dSn2 ≪ dS2. This is related to the weaker coupling between electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom in Sn2.
Figure 3

Sketch of PESs for the S0, S2, and Sn2 states for a generalized coordinate q. The vertical transition energies, dimensionless displacements, and reorganization energies are indicated by ω, d, and λ, respectively. We observe the maximum of the S2→Sn2 ESA contribution at ωSn2,rel ≈ 17 000 cm−1, i.e., blue-shifted compared to the vertical transition energy.

Sketch of PESs for the S0, S2, and Sn2 states for a generalized coordinate q. The vertical transition energies, dimensionless displacements, and reorganization energies are indicated by ω, d, and λ, respectively. We observe the maximum of the S2→Sn2 ESA contribution at ωSn2,rel ≈ 17 000 cm−1, i.e., blue-shifted compared to the vertical transition energy. Whether S2→Sn2 makes a significant contribution in optical experiments is determined by its transition dipole moment, μS2→Sn2. On the basis of combined simulations of the 1Q-2D and the 2Q-2D spectrum in Figure 2, we estimate μS2→Sn2 to be 0.36 in units of the GSB. The model and parameters discussed above allow for a consistent as well as highly accurate description of the linear absorption spectrum, 1Q-2D, and 2Q-2D experiments. The S2→Sn2 transition characterized in this work has implications for a number of investigations of carotenoid excited-state dynamics. First, it quantifies proposed analogous assignments of such a transition derived with indirect methods.[5,19,23] Second, it shows that all pathways associated with S2→Sn2 need to be considered in the analysis of the ultrafast optical response of carotenoids. To demonstrate this, we show in Figure 4a a pump−probe transient at ωexc = 21 000 cm−1 (475 nm) and ωPr = 16 250 cm−1 (615 nm). For these calculations, we used 60 fs pump and probe pulses, which are comparable to previous experimental studies.[8] We partition the signal into its constituents, i.e., SE, S2→Sn2 (ESA+DQC), and S1→Sn1 (ESA from the relaxed S1 state). We find that the S2→Sn2 signal peaks at t2 ≈ 20 fs, whereas the SE contribution reaches its maximum around t2 = 50 fs. The S1→Sn1 contribution rises comparatively slowly as a result of the finite electronic relaxation from the S2 state. The total transient displays a modulation that appears like a strongly damped oscillation with an effective period of 120 fs. The differing rise dynamics of the S2→Sn2 signal and the SE in Figure 4a are related to the DQC pathways adding to the former. As shown in Figure 4b,c, we only observe a significant modulation of the transient if we pump close to the first peak of the linear absorption spectrum and probe around 16 250 cm−1. It is only for this combination of pump and probe frequencies that the rise of SE and S2→Sn2 are sufficiently different to result in a modulation.
Figure 4

Calculated transient absorption traces for different pump and probe frequencies. (a) ωexc = 21 000 cm−1, ωPr = 16 250 cm−1. The total signal (thick black solid) has been partitioned into SE (orange), S2→Sn2 (ESA+DQC) (red), and S1→Sn1 (blue) contributions. (b) Pump−probe signal for ωexc = 20 000 cm−1, ωPr = 16 250 cm−1. (c) Pump−probe signal for ωexc = 21 000 cm−1, ωPr = 17 250 cm−1. The thin red lines in panels b and c show the S2→Sn2 contribution.

Calculated transient absorption traces for different pump and probe frequencies. (a) ωexc = 21 000 cm−1, ωPr = 16 250 cm−1. The total signal (thick black solid) has been partitioned into SE (orange), S2→Sn2 (ESA+DQC) (red), and S1→Sn1 (blue) contributions. (b) Pump−probe signal for ωexc = 20 000 cm−1, ωPr = 16 250 cm−1. (c) Pump−probe signal for ωexc = 21 000 cm−1, ωPr = 17 250 cm−1. The thin red lines in panels b and c show the S2→Sn2 contribution. The dependence of the modulation on pump and probe frequency shown in Figure 4 can be understood by considering two different effects. First, changing the pump frequency alters the initial preparation of nuclear modes in S2, thereby reshaping the amplitude and shape of the spectra as well as the temporal profiles of the various contributions. Pumping on the red edge leads to faster rise of SE and S2→Sn2 ESA as well as a relative decrease in the S2→Sn2 ESA amplitude. The second effect concerns the pump and probe frequency dependence of the DQC response functions and can be understood from their oscillations during the second time period, exp(i(Δexc + Δpr)·tb).[23] Here, tb is the actual delay between the second and third electric field interactions, and Δexc = ωexc− ωS and Δpr = ωpr − ωS are detunings defined with respect to the vertical electronic transitions. With the pump tuned to the first peak of the linear absorption spectrum (Figure 4a), the pump and probe detunings partially cancel, and the DQC response functions vary slowly with tb. On the other hand, pumping at the red (Figure 4b) or blue edge of the linear absorption spectrum gives rise to fast oscillations of the DQC response functions. Such rapidly evolving terms will average out over the finite envelopes of the pulses and make insignificant contributions to the total signal. Similarly, shifting the probe frequency (Figure 4c) leads to diminished DQC contributions and an S2→Sn2 signal that is dominated by the ESA pathways. However, the dependence on probe frequency is more complicated since one also needs to consider the frequency-dependent ratio of DQC to ESA contributions. The observed modulation in the pump−probe transients is readily explained by the DQC pathways inherent to three-level systems. Predicting the specific combination of pump and probe frequencies leading to the highest visibility of the oscillations is a nontrivial problem, making detailed analysis of these features difficult. Therefore, 1Q-2D and 2Q-2D measurements quantifying the different polarization components are the only way to obtain complete information about the system and its dynamics. Recently, strongly damped oscillations in pump−probe transients were observed in the spectral range from 600 to 700 nm for β-carotene and lutein.[8] These oscillations were found to depend on both pump and probe frequencies and were only observed if the pump was tuned to the first peak of the linear absorption spectrum. These results were interpreted as quantum beats due to strong electronic coupling between S2 (1Bu+) and a “dark” state (1Bu−). Such a model also predicts a doubly excited state formed by simultaneous excitation of 1Bu+ and 1Bu−, leading to extra diagonal and off-diagonal peaks in the 2Q-2D spectrum[24] not seen in our experiment. Rather, the 2Q-2D experiment reveals the presence of Sn2, implying that all pathways associated with this transition are required for the proper description of the ultrafast response. The inclusion of DQC pathways and finite pulse effects explain the experimentally observed modulations directly, as well as the pump and probe frequency dependence as shown in Figure 4. Via the use of coherent multidimensional spectroscopy, we dissect the intricate nonlinear optical response of β-carotene in solution. By expanding the signal in higher dimensions and exploiting time ordering to isolate specific signal contributions, we reveal and characterize the hitherto unknown S2→Sn2 transition in the visible. Our method lets us derive a model, which (i) is in excellent agreement with 1Q-2D and 2Q-2D measurements, (ii) characterizes spectral motions on the involved PES, (iii) and explains pump-frequency-dependent oscillations in pump−probe transients without invoking “dark” electronic states. Our results clearly demonstrate that electronic states in the vicinity of twice the GSB energy are sparse and display structured features. These states give rise to complicated coherence signatures, which are best analyzed with the combination of 1Q- and 2Q-2D spectroscopy. We expect this approach to be of interest for the studies of molecular aggregates and pigment−protein complexes where two-exciton states give rise to strong ESA signatures.
  20 in total

1.  Two-dimensional femtosecond spectroscopy.

Authors:  David M Jonas
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 12.703

Review 2.  Ultrafast dynamics of carotenoid excited States-from solution to natural and artificial systems.

Authors:  Tomás Polívka; Villy Sundström
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Two-quantum many-body coherences in two-dimensional fourier-transform spectra of exciton resonances in semiconductor quantum wells.

Authors:  Denis Karaiskaj; Alan D Bristow; Lijun Yang; Xingcan Dai; Richard P Mirin; Shaul Mukamel; Steven T Cundiff
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Conjugation length dependence of internal conversion in carotenoids: role of the intermediate state.

Authors:  D Polli; G Cerullo; G Lanzani; S De Silvestri; K Yanagi; H Hashimoto; R J Cogdell
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  A coherent nonlinear optical signal induced by electron correlations.

Authors:  Shaul Mukamel; Rafał Oszwałdowski; Lijun Yang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  Coherent two-dimensional optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Minhaeng Cho
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Electronic coherence provides a direct proof for energy-level crossing in photoexcited lutein and beta-carotene.

Authors:  Evgeny Ostroumov; Marc G Müller; Christel M Marian; Martin Kleinschmidt; Alfred R Holzwarth
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Excited-state dynamics of carotenoids in light-harvesting complexes. 1. Exploring the relationship between the S1 and S* states.

Authors:  Emmanouil Papagiannakis; Ivo H M van Stokkum; Mikas Vengris; Richard J Cogdell; Rienk van Grondelle; Delmar S Larsen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Pump-degenerate four wave mixing as a technique for analyzing structural and electronic evolution: multidimensional time-resolved dynamics near a conical intersection.

Authors:  Jürgen Hauer; Tiago Buckup; Marcus Motzkus
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Two-quantum 2D FT electronic spectroscopy of biexcitons in GaAs quantum wells.

Authors:  Katherine W Stone; Kenan Gundogdu; Daniel B Turner; Xiaoqin Li; Steven T Cundiff; Keith A Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Coherent nonlinear optical studies of elementary processes in biological complexes: diagrammatic techniques based on the wave function versus the density matrix.

Authors:  Jason D Biggs; Judith A Voll; Shaul Mukamel
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Effects of tunable excitation in carotenoids explained by the vibrational energy relaxation approach.

Authors:  Vytautas Balevičius; Craig N Lincoln; Daniele Viola; Giulio Cerullo; Jürgen Hauer; Darius Abramavicius
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Two-dimensional double-quantum spectra reveal collective resonances in an atomic vapor.

Authors:  Xingcan Dai; Marten Richter; Hebin Li; Alan D Bristow; Cyril Falvo; Shaul Mukamel; Steven T Cundiff
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Carotenoid-to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer through vibronic coupling in LH2 from Phaeosprillum molischianum.

Authors:  Erling Thyrhaug; Craig N Lincoln; Federico Branchi; Giulio Cerullo; Václav Perlík; František Šanda; Heiko Lokstein; Jürgen Hauer
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Explaining the temperature dependence of spirilloxanthin's S* signal by an inhomogeneous ground state model.

Authors:  J Hauer; M Maiuri; D Viola; V Lukes; S Henry; A M Carey; R J Cogdell; G Cerullo; D Polli
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  A Unified Picture of S* in Carotenoids.

Authors:  Vytautas Balevičius; Darius Abramavicius; Tomáš Polívka; Arpa Galestian Pour; Jürgen Hauer
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 6.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.