Literature DB >> 23827003

Patient satisfaction in radiology: qualitative analysis of written complaints generated over a 10-year period in an academic medical center.

Gloria Salazar1, Keith Quencer, Shima Aran, Hani Abujudeh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to review patients' complaints about their care in radiology and to determine key areas for improvement.
METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study was conducted to retrospectively evaluate all radiology-related patient complaints received by the authors' institution's Office of Patient Advocacy from April 1999 to December 2010. The internal review classified the complaints into those that concerned medical complications, radiology staff members, failure to provide patient-centered care, and those that related to quality on the basis of radiologic benchmarks of safety, systems, and professionalism. The rate of successful complaint resolution was also tallied. The incidence of complaints per modality was calculated as a fraction of the total number of radiologic examinations performed.
RESULTS: A total of 153 radiology-related complaints were identified. The majority of complaints (60.1% [92 of 153]) described a failure to provide patient-centered care. Of the remaining complaints, 26.2% (40 of 153) reported physical discomfort, 10.5% (16 of 153) reported a combination of both physical discomfort and lack of patient-centered care, and 3.2% (5 of 153) were not related to either category. Of the complaints regarding quality, 44.5% (68 of 153) were associated with operational systems, 24.2% (37 of 153) with safety, 17% (26 of 153) with professionalism, and 14.3% (22 of 153) with multifactorial events. Delays accounted for 20.2% of complaints (31 of 153), and 49.6% of complaints (76 of 153) concerned radiology staff members. Complaint resolution was achieved in 83.6% of cases (128 of 153). The overall incidence of complaints per radiologic procedure was 0.238 per 10,000. The incidence of complaints associated with interventional procedures (3.26 per 10,000) was significantly (P < .05) higher than the incidence of those associated with noninterventional examinations (0.138 per 10,000).
CONCLUSIONS: Failure to provide patient-centered care was the most common complaint; most of these complaints could be attributed to systems issues. There was a higher incidence of complaints related to interventional procedures than diagnostic examinations. Delays and providers' interactions with patients were identified as key areas for improvement.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23827003     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  11 in total

1.  Pediatric interventional radiology clinic - how are we doing?

Authors:  Jonathan Rubenstein; Julie C Zettel; Eric Lee; Michelle Cote; Albert Aziza; Bairbre L Connolly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-06

2.  A Pilot of Data-Driven Modeling to Assess Potential for Improved Efficiency in an Academic Breast-Imaging Center.

Authors:  Tali Amir; Bonmyong Lee; Ryan W Woods; Lisa A Mullen; Susan C Harvey
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Large-Scale Assessment of Scan-Time Variability and Multiple-Procedure Efficiency for Cross-Sectional Neuroradiological Exams in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ray Zhang; Vamsi R Narra; Akash P Kansagra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  The effect of music on pain and subjective experience in image-guided musculoskeletal corticosteroid injections: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Weier Li; Roy G Bryan; Arvin Kheterpal; Frank J Simeone; Connie Y Chang; Martin Torriani; Ambrose J Huang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Does Patient Satisfaction Drive Volumes in Outpatient Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Authors:  Amna A Ajam; Elvira V Lang; Xuan V Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  Qualitative Study to Understand Ordering of CT Angiography to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Room Setting.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Silas W Smith; Emma Simon; Masha Kuznetsova; Leora I Horwitz; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Patients' satisfaction with inpatient services provided in hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, during 2011-2013.

Authors:  Jalil Makarem; Bagher Larijani; Kobra Joodaki; Sahar Ghaderi; Fatemeh Nayeri; Masoud Mohammadpoor
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2016-06-11

8.  How Do Patients Rate Their Radiation Oncologists in the Modern Era: An Analysis of Vitals.com.

Authors:  Simrath Randhawa; Asim Viqar; Julia Strother; Arpan V Prabhu; Fen Xia; Dwight Heron; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-09-17

9.  What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.

Authors:  Arpan V Prabhu; Simrath Randhawa; David Clump; Dwight E Heron; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-02-06

10.  Identifying communication-related predictors of patient satisfaction in a briefing prior to contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Valentina Scholz; Sandra Lange; Britta Rosenberg; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Annika Syperek; Norbert Hosten; Thomas Kohlmann; Michael Kirsch
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.