| Literature DB >> 23826355 |
Tina Suominen1, Päivi Uutela, Raimo A Ketola, Jonas Bergquist, Lars Hillered, Moshe Finel, Hongbo Zhang, Aki Laakso, Risto Kostiainen.
Abstract
An UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), their phase I metabolites 5-HIAA, DOPAC and HVA, and their sulfate and glucuronide conjugates in human brain microdialysis samples obtained from two patients with acute brain injuries, ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples obtained from four patients with obstructive hydrocephalus, and a lumbar CSF sample pooled mainly from patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in preparation for orthopedic surgery. The method was validated by determining the limits of detection and quantification, linearity, repeatability and specificity. The direct method enabled the analysis of the intact phase II metabolites of 5-HT and DA, without hydrolysis of the conjugates. The method also enabled the analysis of the regioisomers of the conjugates, and several intact glucuronide and sulfate conjugates were identified and quantified for the first time in the human brain microdialysis and CSF samples. We were able to show the presence of 5-HIAA sulfate, and that dopamine-3-O-sulfate predominates over dopamine-4-O-sulfate in the human brain. The quantitative results suggest that sulfonation is a more important phase II metabolism pathway than glucuronidation in the human brain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23826355 PMCID: PMC3694921 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Main metabolic routes of serotonin and dopamine to their phase I metabolites.
Validation results for all the compounds analyzed.
| Linearity | LOD | LOQ | Repeatability | Repeatability | |||
| range | S/N = 3 | S/N ≥10 | Accuracy | 10 nM, n = 6 | 100 nM, n = 6 | ||
| Compound | nM | r2 | nM | nM | % | rsd % | rsd % |
|
| 0.5–25 | 0.997 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 90–120 | 6.0 | nm |
|
| 0.5–50 | 0.998 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 90–110 | 4.3 | nm |
|
| 1–50 | 0.997 | 0.3 | 1 | 91–116 | 5.1 | 0.6 |
| 50-1000 | 0.998 | 93–115 | |||||
|
| 1–1000 | 0.998 | 0.3 | 1 | 91–112 | 5.7 | 1.5 |
|
| 1–25 | 0.996 | 0.2 | 1 | 89–112 | 1.8 | nm |
|
| 0.25–25 | 0.997 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 96–103 | 2.5 | nm |
|
| 1–100 | 0.999 | 0.4 | 1 | 94–107 | 2.6 | nm |
|
| 50–1000 | 0.998 | 10 | 50 | 95–110 | nm | |
|
| 25–1000 | 0.996 | 2.5 | 25 | 93–113 | nm | 2.0 |
|
| 25–1000 | 0.998 | 4.3 | 25 | 95–110 | nm | nm |
|
| 100–1000 | 0.999 | 25 | 100 | 98–102 | nm | 7.0 |
| 250–5000 | 0.999 | 95–120 | |||||
|
| 5–100 | 0.999 | 1.0 | 5 | 92–111 | 4.9 | 2.9 |
|
| 5–500 | 0.999 | 1.4 | 5 | 95–118 | nm | nm |
|
| 25–1000 | 0.998 | 6.4 | 25 | 91–106 | nm | 4.0 |
| 250–3500 | 0.999 | 95–103 | |||||
|
| 5–500 | 0.998 | 1.0 | 5 | 86–116 | 7.2 | 3.2 |
|
| 10–1000 | 0.999 | 5.0 | 10 | 96–113 | nm | 10.0 |
nm = not measured.
Findings in the human brain microdialysis and the human cerebrospinal fluid samples.
| Microdialysis samples | Cerebrospinal fluid samples | ||||||||
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Ventricular | Lumbar | ||||||
| Compound | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | Patient 6 | Pooled |
|
| – | – | 0.52a | 0.54a | 0.84a | – | 0.70a | 1.2 | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.63a |
|
| 0.45 | 0.80 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| 90 | 110 | 90 | 100 | 1400 | 340 | 220 | 540 | 35 |
|
| 450 | 550 | 520 | 380 | 370 | 170 | 96 | 390 | 86 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| 330 | 630 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 10 | 18 | 14 | 9.4 | 12 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.0 | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| 1100 | 2000 | 280 | 150 | 4200 | 601 | 2200 | 2200 | 120 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| 15 | 12 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
All concentrations are in nM.
The microdialysis samples (patients n = 2) were analyzed as singles. Each of the CSF samples (four ventricular CSF samples (patients 1–4), one lumbar CSF sample pooled from several patients were analyzed in triplicate (concentrations shown are the mean concentrations). – not detected, a
Figure 2Findings in the human brain microdialysis samples.
SRM ion chromatograms of A: standards (1 nM 5-HT and 5-HT-G, 5 nM DA-3-O-S and HVA-O-G, 100 nM HVA, 5-HIAA and 5-HIAA-S); B: a blank sample (Ringer’s solution); C: a human brain microdialysis sample from patient 1; D: a human brain microdialysis sample from patient 2.
Figure 3Findings in the human CSF samples.
SRM ion chromatograms of A: standards (0.5 nM 5-HT and 5-HT-S, 10 nM DA-4- and 3-O-S and 100 nM HVA, 5-HIAA and 5-HIAA-S); B: a blank sample (Ringer’s solution); C-F: ventricular cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients 3–6; G: lumbar cerebrospinal fluid sample pooled from several patients.