Literature DB >> 23825779

Going with the flow: how reproducible are cardiac magnetic resonance measurements of myocardial perfusion?

John Biglands1, Sven Plein.   

Abstract

Year:  2013        PMID： 23825779      PMCID： PMC3698253          DOI： 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.05.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN： 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Quantitative magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion analysis: inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  O M Mühling; M E Dickson; A Zenovich; Y Huang; B V Wilson; R F Wilson; I S Anand; R T Seethamraju; M Jerosch-Herold; N M Wilke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: inter-study reproducibility.

Authors:  Geraint Morton; Roy Jogiya; Sven Plein; Andreas Schuster; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Interstudy reproducibility of quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Andrew G Elkington; Peter D Gatehouse; Nicholas A Ablitt; Guang-Zhong Yang; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Nonlinear myocardial signal intensity correction improves quantification of contrast-enhanced first-pass MR perfusion in humans.

Authors:  Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Reproducibility of first-pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Abdulghani M Larghat; Neil Maredia; John Biglands; John P Greenwood; Stephen G Ball; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Reproducibility of myocardial perfusion reserve - variations in measurements from post processing using commercially available software.

Authors:  Pavel Goykhman; Puja K Mehta; Megha Agarwal; Chrisandra Shufelt; Piotr J Slomka; Yuching Yang; Yuan Xu; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Noel Bairey Merz; Louise E J Thomson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-12

Review 8.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Reproducibility of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in multi-vessel symptomatic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sharon Chih; Peter S Macdonald; Michael P Feneley; Matthew Law; Robert M Graham; Jane A McCrohon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial.

Authors:  John P Greenwood; Neil Maredia; John F Younger; Julia M Brown; Jane Nixon; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; John P Ridgway; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Catherine J Dickinson; Stephen G Ball; Sven Plein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 79.321
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.