Literature DB >> 23825750

Major morbidity after lung resection: a comparison between the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database system and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system.

Michele Salati1, Majed Refai, Cecilia Pompili, Francesco Xiumè, Armando Sabbatini, Alessandro Brunelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality (TM&M) classification system is a method for univocally coding the postoperative adverse events by their complexity of management. The aim of the present study was to compare the distribution of the severity of complications according to the TM&M system versus the distribution according to the classification proposed by European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database in a population of patients submitted to lung resection in our unit.
METHODS: 457 patients with any type of complications (326 lobectomy, 60 pneumonectomy, 71 wedge/segmentectomy) out of 1,518 patients submitted to pulmonary resections (January 2000-April 2011) were analyzed. Each complication was graded from I to V (TM&M system), reflecting an increasing severity of management. We verified the distribution of the different grades of complications and analyzed their frequency among those defined as "major cardio-pulmonary complications" by the ESTS Database.
RESULTS: According to the TM&M system, 0.6% of complications were regarded as grade I, 66.3% as grade II, 9.5% as grade IIIa, 4.4% as grade IIIb, 6.8% as grade IVa, 3.3% as grade IVb and 9.1% as grade V. According to the ESTS definitions, 290 complications were regarded as "major". Sixty two percent of them were reclassified as minor complications (grade I or II) by the TM&M classification system.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of the TM&M grading system questions the traditional classification of complications following lung resection. This grading system may be used as an additional endpoint for outcome analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer surgery-outcomes-surgery; complications

Year:  2013        PMID: 23825750      PMCID: PMC3698292          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.05.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  11 in total

1.  Lessons learned from the European thoracic surgery database: the Composite Performance Score.

Authors:  A Brunelli; G Rocco; D Van Raemdonck; G Varela; M Dahan
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Applying total quality management concepts to public health organizations.

Authors:  A D Kaluzny; C P McLaughlin; K Simpson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The European Thoracic Database project: composite performance score to measure quality of care after major lung resection.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli; Richard G Berrisford; Gaetano Rocco; Gonzalo Varela
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Standardized combined outcome index as an instrument for monitoring performance after pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli; Majed Refai; Michele Salati; Cecilia Pompili; Armando Sabbatini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Evaluating the reliability and reproducibility of the Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system.

Authors:  Jelena Ivanovic; Ahmed Al-Hussaini; Derar Al-Shehab; Jennifer Threader; Patrick James Villeneuve; Tim Ramsay; Donna E Maziak; Sebastian Gilbert; Farid M Shamji; R Sudhir Sundaresan; Andrew J E Seely
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  External validation of the recalibrated thoracic revised cardiac risk index for predicting the risk of major cardiac complications after lung resection.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli; Stephen D Cassivi; Juan Fibla; Lisa A Halgren; Dennis A Wigle; Mark S Allen; Francis C Nichols; K Robert Shen; Claude Deschamps
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J E Seely; Jelena Ivanovic; Jennifer Threader; Ahmed Al-Hussaini; Derar Al-Shehab; Tim Ramsay; Sebastian Gilbert; Donna E Maziak; Farid M Shamji; R Sudhir Sundaresan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kozower; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Michael J Liptay; Christine L Lau; David R Jones; David M Shahian; Cameron D Wright
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  Editorial comment on: "Major morbidity after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resections: a comparison between the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system" by Sandri A, et al.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Adding value in healthcare: understanding the whole denominator.

Authors:  Christopher W Seder
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Major morbidity after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resections: a comparison between the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system.

Authors:  Alberto Sandri; Kostas Papagiannopoulos; Richard Milton; Emmanuel Kefaloyannis; Nilanjan Chaudhuri; Emily Poyser; Nicholas Spencer; Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Pulmonary arterial enlargement predicts cardiopulmonary complications after pulmonary resection for lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Keisuke Asakura; Shota Mitsuboshi; Makoto Tsuji; Hiroyuki Sakamaki; Sotaro Otake; Shinsaku Matsuda; Kaoru Kaseda; Kenichi Watanabe
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Intensive rehabilitation as an independent determinant of better outcome in patients with lung tumors treated by thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Oliwia Glogowska; Maciej Glogowski; Sebastian Szmit
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.318

6.  The effects of respiratory physiotherapy after lung resection: Protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Karoline Stentoft Andersen; Birgit Skoffer; Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard; Maurits Van Tulder; Annemette Krintel Petersen
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  Biglycan, tumor endothelial cell secreting proteoglycan, as possible biomarker for lung cancer.

Authors:  Hirofumi Morimoto; Yasuhiro Hida; Nako Maishi; Hiroshi Nishihara; Yutaka Hatanaka; Cong Li; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Toru Nakamura; Satoshi Hirano; Kyoko Hida
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Commentary: Bringing down Babel-a pathway to a universal adverse events language.

Authors:  Eagan J Peters; Biniam Kidane
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-06-24

9.  Harmonization of adverse events monitoring following thoracic surgery: Pursuit of a common language and methodology.

Authors:  Gregory Sigler; Caitlin Anstee; Andrew J E Seely
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-04-02

10.  Ventilatory efficiency is superior to peak oxygen uptake for prediction of lung resection cardiovascular complications.

Authors:  Andrej Mazur; Kristian Brat; Pavel Homolka; Zdenek Merta; Michal Svoboda; Monika Bratova; Vladimir Sramek; Lyle J Olson; Ivan Cundrle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.