Literature DB >> 23825184

Correlation of MRI grading of bone stress injuries with clinical risk factors and return to play: a 5-year prospective study in collegiate track and field athletes.

Aurelia Nattiv1, Gannon Kennedy, Michelle T Barrack, Ashraf Abdelkerim, Marci A Goolsby, Julie C Arends, Leanne L Seeger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone stress injuries are common in track and field athletes. Knowledge of risk factors and correlation of these to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading could be helpful in determining recovery time.
PURPOSE: To examine the relationships between MRI grading of bone stress injuries with clinical risk factors and time to return to sport in collegiate track and field athletes. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: A total of 211 male and female collegiate track and field and cross-country athletes were followed prospectively through their competitive seasons. All athletes had preparticipation history, physical examination, and anthropometric measurements obtained annually. An additional questionnaire was completed regarding nutritional behaviors, menstrual patterns, and prior injuries, as well as a 3-day diet record. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and each year of participation in the study. Athletes with clinical evidence of bone stress injuries had plain radiographs. If radiograph findings were negative, MRI was performed. Bone stress injuries were evaluated by 2 independent radiologists utilizing an MRI grading system. The MRI grading and risk factors were evaluated to identify predictors of time to return to sport.
RESULTS: Thirty-four of the athletes (12 men, 22 women) sustained 61 bone stress injuries during the 5-year study period. The mean prospective assessment for participants was 2.7 years. In the multiple regression model, MRI grade and total-body bone mineral density (BMD) emerged as significant and independent predictors of time to return to sport. Specifically, the higher the MRI grade (P = .004) and lower the BMD (P = .030), the longer the recovery time. Location of the bone injury at predominantly trabecular sites of the femoral neck, pubic bone, and sacrum was also associated with a prolonged time to return to sport. Female athletes with oligomenorrhea and amenorrhea had bone stress injuries of higher MRI grades compared with eumenorrheic athletes (P = .009).
CONCLUSION: Higher MRI grade, lower BMD, and skeletal sites of predominant trabecular bone structures were associated with a delayed recovery of bone stress injuries in track and field athletes. Knowledge of these risk factors, as well as nutritional and menstrual factors, can be clinically useful in determining injury severity and time to return to sport.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI grading; bone stress injury; female athlete triad; stress fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23825184      PMCID: PMC4367232          DOI: 10.1177/0363546513490645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  51 in total

1.  Evidence of negative energy balance using doubly labelled water in elite Kenyan endurance runners prior to competition.

Authors:  Barry W Fudge; Klaas R Westerterp; Festus K Kiplamai; Vincent O Onywera; Michael K Boit; Bengt Kayser; Yannis P Pitsiladis
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Age-related loss of muscle mass and bone strength in mice is associated with a decline in physical activity and serum leptin.

Authors:  Mark W Hamrick; Ke-Hong Ding; Catherine Pennington; Yuh J Chao; Yii-Der Wu; Boyd Howard; David Immel; Cesario Borlongan; Paul L McNeil; Wendy B Bollag; Walton W Curl; Jack Yu; Carlos M Isales
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Can running cause the appearance of marrow edema on MR images of the foot and ankle?

Authors:  K M Lazzarini; R N Troiano; R C Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Ultrasound as a primary evaluation tool of bone stress injuries in elite track and field athletes.

Authors:  Agapi Papalada; Nikolaos Malliaropoulos; Kostas Tsitas; Olga Kiritsi; Nat Padhiar; Angelo Del Buono; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Gender differences in musculoskeletal injury rates: a function of symptom reporting?

Authors:  S A Almeida; D W Trone; D M Leone; R A Shaffer; S L Patheal; K Long
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 6.  Imaging of stress injuries to bone. Radiography, scintigraphy, and MR imaging.

Authors:  A L Deutsch; M N Coel; J H Mink
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 7.  The use of MR imaging in the assessment and clinical management of stress reactions of bone in high-performance athletes.

Authors:  E A Arendt; H J Griffiths
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.182

8.  Stress fractures of the femoral shaft in athletes--more common than expected. A new clinical test.

Authors:  A W Johnson; C B Weiss; D L Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Stress fractures in athletes. A study of 320 cases.

Authors:  G O Matheson; D B Clement; D C McKenzie; J E Taunton; D R Lloyd-Smith; J G MacIntyre
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Bone stress: a radionuclide imaging perspective.

Authors:  L W Roub; L W Gumerman; E N Hanley; M W Clark; M Goodman; D L Herbert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  36 in total

1.  Fractures in Relation to Menstrual Status and Bone Parameters in Young Athletes.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Natalia Cano Sokoloff; Giovana DE Nardo Maffazioli; Hannah M Clarke; Hang Lee; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Parallels with the Female Athlete Triad in Male Athletes.

Authors:  Adam S Tenforde; Michelle T Barrack; Aurelia Nattiv; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Stress fractures of the foot and ankle, part 2: site-specific etiology, imaging, and treatment, and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Bharti Khurana; Stacy E Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Food Versus Pharmacy: Assessment of Nutritional and Pharmacological Strategies to Improve Bone Health in Energy-Deficient Exercising Women.

Authors:  Emily A Southmayd; Adelaide C Hellmers; Mary Jane De Souza
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Negative magnetic resonance imaging in three cases of anterior tibial cortex stress fractures.

Authors:  Ralph Smith; M Moghal; J L Newton; N Jones; J Teh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The Epidemiology of Stress Fractures in Collegiate Student-Athletes, 2004-2005 Through 2013-2014 Academic Years.

Authors:  Katherine H Rizzone; Kathryn E Ackerman; Karen G Roos; Thomas P Dompier; Zachary Y Kerr
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Associations between the female athlete triad and injury among high school runners.

Authors:  Mitchell J Rauh; Michelle Barrack; Jeanne F Nichols
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-12

Review 8.  Sex Differences in Common Sports Injuries.

Authors:  Cindy Y Lin; Ellen Casey; Daniel C Herman; Nicole Katz; Adam S Tenforde
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Negative magnetic resonance imaging in femoral neck stress fracture with joint effusion: a case report.

Authors:  Nobutoshi Seki; Koichiro Okuyama; Keiji Kamo; Mitsuho Chiba; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Evaluating maternal recovery from labor and delivery: bone and levator ani injuries.

Authors:  Janis M Miller; Lisa Kane Low; Ruth Zielinski; Abigail R Smith; John O L DeLancey; Catherine Brandon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.