Literature DB >> 23822446

Conditions for reliable time-resolved dosimetry of electronic portal imaging devices for fixed-gantry IMRT and VMAT.

Inhwan Jason Yeo1, Jae Won Jung, Baldev Patyal, Anant Mandapaka, Byong Yong Yi, Jong Oh Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The continuous scanning mode of electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) that offers time-resolved information has been newly explored for verifying dynamic radiation deliveries. This study seeks to determine operating conditions (dose rate stability and time resolution) under which that mode can be used accurately for the time-resolved dosimetry of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beams.
METHODS: The authors have designed the following test beams with variable beam holdoffs and dose rate regulations: a 10 × 10 cm open beam to serve as a reference beam; a sliding window (SW) beam utilizing the motion of a pair of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaves outside the 10 × 10 cm jaw; a step and shoot (SS) beam to move the pair in step; a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam. The beams were designed in such a way that they all produce the same open beam output of 10 × 10 cm. Time-resolved ion chamber measurements at isocenter and time-resolved and integrating EPID measurements were performed for all beams. The time-resolved EPID measurements were evaluated through comparison with the ion chamber and integrating EPID measurements, as the latter are accepted procedures. For two-dimensional, time-resolved evaluation, a VMAT beam with an infield MLC travel was designed. Time-resolved EPID measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of such EPID dose images for this beam were performed and intercompared.
RESULTS: For IMRT beams (SW and SS), the authors found disagreement greater than 2%, caused by frame missing of the time-resolved mode. However, frame missing disappeared, yielding agreement better than 2%, when the dose rate of irradiation (and thus the frame acquisition rates) reached a stable and planned rate as the dose of irradiation was raised past certain thresholds (a minimum 12 s of irradiation per shoot used for SS IMRT). For VMAT, the authors found that dose rate does not affect the frame acquisition rate, thereby causing no frame missing. However, serious inplanar nonuniformities were found. This could be overcome by sacrificing temporal resolution (10 frames or 0.95 s/image): the continuous images agreed with ion chamber responses at the center of EPID and the calculation two-dimensionally in a time-resolved manner.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have determined conditions under which the continuous mode can be used for time-resolved dosimetry of fixed-gantry IMRT and VMAT and demonstrated it for VMAT.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23822446      PMCID: PMC3702595          DOI: 10.1118/1.4811099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Full forward Monte Carlo calculation of portal dose from MLC collimated treatment beams.

Authors:  E Spezi; D G Lewis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID.

Authors:  B Warkentin; S Steciw; S Rathee; B G Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A Monte Carlo based three-dimensional dose reconstruction method derived from portal dose images.

Authors:  Wouter J C van Elmpt; Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten; Robert F H Schiffeleers; André L A J Dekker; Ben J Mijnheer; Philippe Lambin; André W H Minken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Portal dose image verification: the collapsed cone superposition method applied with different electronic portal imaging devices.

Authors:  Christina Vallhagen Dahlgren; Karsten Eilertsen; Trude Dahl Jørgensen; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dosimetric properties of an amorphous-silicon EPID used in continuous acquisition mode for application to dynamic and arc IMRT.

Authors:  B M C McCurdy; P B Greer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  On the impact of dose rate variation upon RapidArc implementation of volumetric modulated are therapy.

Authors:  Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Luca Cozzi; Antonella Fogliata; Eugenio Vanetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Fast transit portal dosimetry using density-scaled layer modeling of aSi-based electronic portal imaging device and Monte Carlo method.

Authors:  Jae Won Jung; Jong Oh Kim; Inhwan Jason Yeo; Young-Bin Cho; Sun Mo Kim; Steven DiBiase
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.

Authors:  Geneviève Jarry; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Initial evaluation of a commercial EPID modified to a novel direct-detection configuration for radiotherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  Philip Vial; Peter B Greer; Lyn Oliver; Clive Baldock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Monte Carlo computation of dosimetric amorphous silicon electronic portal images.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Siebers; Jong Oh Kim; Lung Ko; Paul J Keall; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Influence of Acquisition Mode on the Dosimetric Performance of an Amorphous Silicon Electronic Portal Imaging Device.

Authors:  Omemh Bawazeer; Sisira Herath; Siva Sarasanandarajah; Tomas Kron; Pradip Deb
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

2.  Is a weekly qualitative picket fence test sufficient? A proposed alternate EPID-based weekly MLC QA program.

Authors:  Chaitanya Kalavagunta; Huijun Xu; Baoshe Zhang; Sina Mossahebi; Michael MacFarlane; Kai Jiang; Sung-Woo Lee; Shifeng Chen; Amit Sawant; Arun Gopal; ByongYong Yi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.243

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.