OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an alternative approach to biofilm disruption on dental hard tissue, We evaluated the effect of methylene blue and a 660 nm diode laser on the viability and architecture of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial biofilms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten human teeth were inoculated with bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterococcus faecalis to form 3 day biofilms in prepared root canals. Bioluminescence imaging was used to serially quantify and evaluate the bacterial viability, and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) imaging was used to assess architecture and morphology of bacterial biofilm before and after PDT employing methylene blue and 40 mW, 660 nm diode laser light delivered into the root canal via a 300 μm fiber for 240 sec, resulting in a total energy of 9.6 J. The data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test. RESULTS: The bacterial reduction showed a dose dependence; as the light energy increased, the bioluminescence decreased in both planktonic suspension and in biofilms. The SEM analysis showed a significant reduction of biofilm on the surface. PDT promoted disruption of the biofilm and the number of adherent bacteria was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The photodynamic effect seems to disrupt the biofilm by acting both on bacterial cells and on the extracellular matrix.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an alternative approach to biofilm disruption on dental hard tissue, We evaluated the effect of methylene blue and a 660 nm diode laser on the viability and architecture of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial biofilms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten human teeth were inoculated with bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterococcus faecalis to form 3 day biofilms in prepared root canals. Bioluminescence imaging was used to serially quantify and evaluate the bacterial viability, and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) imaging was used to assess architecture and morphology of bacterial biofilm before and after PDT employing methylene blue and 40 mW, 660 nm diode laser light delivered into the root canal via a 300 μm fiber for 240 sec, resulting in a total energy of 9.6 J. The data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test. RESULTS: The bacterial reduction showed a dose dependence; as the light energy increased, the bioluminescence decreased in both planktonic suspension and in biofilms. The SEM analysis showed a significant reduction of biofilm on the surface. PDT promoted disruption of the biofilm and the number of adherent bacteria was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The photodynamic effect seems to disrupt the biofilm by acting both on bacterial cells and on the extracellular matrix.
Authors: J S Friedberg; C Skema; E D Baum; J Burdick; S A Vinogradov; D F Wilson; A D Horan; I Nachamkin Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Alessandra Baptista; Ilka T Kato; Renato A Prates; Luis C Suzuki; Marcus P Raele; Anderson Z Freitas; Martha S Ribeiro Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Ricardo R A Hayek; Ney S Araújo; Marco A Gioso; Jonathan Ferreira; Carlos A Baptista-Sobrinho; Aécio M Yamada; Martha S Ribeiro Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: Lintian Yuan; Peijun Lyu; Ying-Ying Huang; Ning Du; Wei Qi; Michael R Hamblin; Yuguang Wang Journal: J Photochem Photobiol B Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 6.252
Authors: Anika Kaura; Rishi Shukla; Abigail Lamyman; Robert Almeyda; Mark Draper; Pablo Martinez-Devesa; Ali Qureishi Journal: Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-01
Authors: Aguinaldo S Garcez; Mohammed Kaplan; Grant J Jensen; Fábio R Scheidt; Eduardo M Oliveira; Selly S Suzuki Journal: Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 3.631
Authors: L López-Jiménez; E Fusté; B Martínez-Garriga; J Arnabat-Domínguez; T Vinuesa; M Viñas Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Áine T De Baróid; Colin P McCoy; Rebecca A Craig; Louise Carson; Gavin P Andrews; David S Jones; Sean P Gorman Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.368