Ji-Jie Pang1, David L Paul, Samuel M Wu. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. jpang@bcm.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Retinal amacrine cells (ACs) may make inhibitory chemical synapses and potentially excitatory gap junctions on ganglion cells (GCs). The total number and subtypes of ACs coupled to the entire GC population were investigated in wild-type and three lines of transgenic mice. METHODS: GCs and GC-coupled ACs were identified by the previously established LY-NB (Lucifer yellow-Neurobiotin) retrograde double-labeling technique, in conjunction with specific antibodies and confocal microscopy. RESULTS: GC-coupled ACs (NB-positive and LY-negative) comprised nearly 11% of displaced ACs and 4% of conventional ACs in wild-type mice, and were 9% and 4% of displaced ACs in Cx45(-/-) and Cx36/45(-/-) mice, respectively. Their somas were small in Cx36/45(-/-) mice, but variable in other strains. They were mostly γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-immunoreactive (IR) and located in the GC layer. They comprised only a small portion in the AC subpopulations, including GABA-IR, glycine-IR, calretinin-IR, 5-HT-accumulating, and ON-type choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) ACs in wild-type and ChAT transgenic mice (ChAT- tdTomato). In the distal 80% of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), dense GC dendrites coexisted with rich glycine-IR and GABA-IR. In the inner 20% of the IPL, sparse GC dendrites presented with a major GABA band and sparse glycine-IR. CONCLUSIONS: Various subtypes of ACs may couple to GCs. ACs of the same immunoreactivity may either couple or not couple to GCs. Cx36 and Cx45 dominate GC-AC coupling except for small ACs. The overall potency of GC-AC coupling is moderate, especially in the proximal 20% of the IPL, where inhibitory chemical signals are dominated by GABA ACs.
PURPOSE: Retinal amacrine cells (ACs) may make inhibitory chemical synapses and potentially excitatory gap junctions on ganglion cells (GCs). The total number and subtypes of ACs coupled to the entire GC population were investigated in wild-type and three lines of transgenic mice. METHODS: GCs and GC-coupled ACs were identified by the previously established LY-NB (Lucifer yellow-Neurobiotin) retrograde double-labeling technique, in conjunction with specific antibodies and confocal microscopy. RESULTS: GC-coupled ACs (NB-positive and LY-negative) comprised nearly 11% of displaced ACs and 4% of conventional ACs in wild-type mice, and were 9% and 4% of displaced ACs in Cx45(-/-) and Cx36/45(-/-) mice, respectively. Their somas were small in Cx36/45(-/-) mice, but variable in other strains. They were mostly γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-immunoreactive (IR) and located in the GC layer. They comprised only a small portion in the AC subpopulations, including GABA-IR, glycine-IR, calretinin-IR, 5-HT-accumulating, and ON-type choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) ACs in wild-type and ChATtransgenic mice (ChAT- tdTomato). In the distal 80% of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), dense GC dendrites coexisted with rich glycine-IR and GABA-IR. In the inner 20% of the IPL, sparse GC dendrites presented with a major GABA band and sparse glycine-IR. CONCLUSIONS: Various subtypes of ACs may couple to GCs. ACs of the same immunoreactivity may either couple or not couple to GCs. Cx36 and Cx45 dominate GC-AC coupling except for small ACs. The overall potency of GC-AC coupling is moderate, especially in the proximal 20% of the IPL, where inhibitory chemical signals are dominated by GABA ACs.
Authors: Adam Hedberg-Buenz; Mark A Christopher; Carly J Lewis; Kimberly A Fernandes; Laura M Dutca; Kai Wang; Todd E Scheetz; Michael D Abràmoff; Richard T Libby; Mona K Garvin; Michael G Anderson Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Chunwei Zhang; Andrew J Tatham; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Zhiyong Yang; James Z Zhang; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Abram Akopian; Tamas Atlasz; Feng Pan; Sze Wong; Yi Zhang; Béla Völgyi; David L Paul; Stewart A Bloomfield Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Aaron N Reifler; Andrew P Chervenak; Michael E Dolikian; Brian A Benenati; Benjamin Y Li; Rebecca D Wachter; Andrew M Lynch; Zachary D Demertzis; Benjamin S Meyers; Fady S Abufarha; Elizabeth R Jaeckel; Michael P Flannery; Kwoon Y Wong Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Masahiro Miyake; Kenji Yamashiro; Yasuharu Tabara; Kenji Suda; Satoshi Morooka; Hideo Nakanishi; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Peng Chen; Fan Qiao; Isao Nakata; Yumiko Akagi-Kurashige; Norimoto Gotoh; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Akira Meguro; Sentaro Kusuhara; Ozen Polasek; Caroline Hayward; Alan F Wright; Harry Campbell; Andrea J Richardson; Maria Schache; Masaki Takeuchi; David A Mackey; Alex W Hewitt; Gabriel Cuellar; Yi Shi; Luling Huang; Zhenglin Yang; Kim Hung Leung; Patrick Y P Kao; Maurice K H Yap; Shea Ping Yip; Muka Moriyama; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; Nobuhisa Mizuki; Stuart MacGregor; Veronique Vitart; Tin Aung; Seang-Mei Saw; E-Shyong Tai; Tien Yin Wong; Ching-Yu Cheng; Paul N Baird; Ryo Yamada; Fumihiko Matsuda; Nagahisa Yoshimura Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 14.919