Literature DB >> 23820199

Dissimilarity of ccrAB gene sequences between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among bovine isolates in Korea.

Young Kyung Park1, Young Hwan Paik, Jang Won Yoon, Lawrence K Fox, Sun Young Hwang, Yong Ho Park.   

Abstract

The sequences of the ccrAB genes from bovine-, canine- and chicken-originating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (S.) epidermidis (MRSE) and bovine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (S.) aureus (MRSA) were compared to investigate the frequency of intra-species horizontal transfer of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) complex. Nineteen MRSE strains were isolated from bovine milk, chickens, and dogs, and their genetic characteristics were investigated by multilocus sequence typing and SCCmec typing. Among the animal MRSE strains, the most frequent SCCmec type was type IV, which consisted of the type B mec complex and ccrAB type 2. The ccrA2 and ccrB2 genes were sequenced from the bovine, chicken and canine MRSE strains and compared with those of the bovine MRSA strains. The sequences generally clustered as MRSA and MRSE groups, regardless of the animal source. Additionally, no bovine MRSE sequence was associated with the bovine MRSA groups. Although most of the bovine MRSE and MRSA isolates possessed SCCmec type IV sequences, our results suggest that the intra-species gene transfer of the SCCmec complex between bovine S. aureus and bovine S. epidermidis strains is not a frequent event.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SCCmec; ccrAB; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23820199      PMCID: PMC3788155          DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2013.14.3.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Sci        ISSN: 1229-845X            Impact factor:   1.672


Introduction

Methicillin-resistant staphylococci, including Staphylococcus (S.) epidermidis (MRSE), have emerged as important pathogens that can cause serious infections in humans and animals [5,30]. Most MRSE strains have also been shown to be resistant to other antimicrobial agents [20], causing concern from a clinical veterinary perspective by threatening to narrow the spectrum of antimicrobial therapeutic choices. Moreover, from a zoonotic point of view, animal reservoirs of MRSE can be considered a great threat to human healthcare. Therefore, effective detection and control of MRSE associated with mastitis in dairy cows is essential. The methicillin resistance of staphylococci is mediated by the mecA gene, which is carried by a mobile genetic element known as the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) [15]. SCCmec is composed of the mec complex containing the mecA gene and its regulator genes, as well as the cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) complex, which encodes site-specific recombinase genes such as ccrA and ccrB [14,17]. These recombinase genes are responsible for the mobility of SCCmec, as they mediate its site-specific insertion and excision [14,17]. Several studies have shown that methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus (S.) aureus can be converted to the pathogen, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), through the transfer of SCCmec from another methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species such as MRSE [2,11,12,33]. To reduce the spread of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections among dairy herds, the distribution of MRSE and transfer of SCCmec should be monitored. However, only a few veterinary investigations of MRSE infections have been published to date [4,25,27]. Here, we identified the prevalence of MRSE among various animal sources, including bovine milk, and compared their ccrAB gene sequences to those of bovine MRSA strains to assess the frequency of intra-species horizontal gene transfer of the SCCmec complex.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains

All utilized S. epidermidis strains were isolated from April 2006 to February 2007. Bovine strains were isolated from quarter milk samples with over 500,000 somatic cells/mL collected from 61 dairy farms in South Korea. Milk somatic cell counts were analyzed with a Somacount 150 (Bentley Instruments, USA) within 24 h of sampling. Chicken strains were isolated from fecal swabs collected from three broiler farms in Gyeonggi and Chungnam. Canine strains were isolated from patients in two veterinary medical teaching hospitals (Chungbuk, Seoul) and one private referral animal clinic (Gyeonggi). S. epidermidis isolates were identified using the schemes developed by Koneman et al. [19] and confirmed using a Vitek II (BioMérieux, France) and PCR with species-specific Serp0107 primers. These primers targeted the gene for a putative transcriptional regulator that is uniquely present in S. epidermidis [24]. Among 857 milk samples showing over 500,000 somatic cell/mL, 21 S. epidermidis strains were isolated. Additionally, 190 fecal swab samples were collected from chickens, from which ten S. epidermidis strains were isolated. Moreover, 175 swab samples from horizontal ear canals (n = 49), nasal mucosa (n = 45), anuses (n = 33), skin (n = 28), urine (n = 12), wound regions (n = 6), and eyes (n = 2) were collected from 35 canine outpatients, and 11 S. epidermidis strains were isolated. For ccrAB comparison, 25 bovine MRSA strains were used in this study. These strains were previously isolated from bovine milk by the above-described method, and had been characterized as SCCmec type IV in our laboratory from 1999 to 2006 [22,23,28].

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to oxacillin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was detected using a microdilution test according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [8]. Isolates with a MIC ≥ 0.5 µg/mL were classified as oxacillin-resistant strains. A disc diffusion test was also performed according to the guidelines of the CLSI and used to test the susceptibility of these oxacillin-resistant isolates to ten other antimicrobials [8]: amikacin, amoxicillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, penicillin, tetracycline, and vancomycin (BD BBL, USA). For quality control, S. aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 were used as reference strains.

DNA preparation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

S. epidermidis isolates were grown overnight on 5% sheep blood agar plates (Promed, Korea) at 37℃. Chromosomal DNA was extracted using the DNeasy tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions with one modification: the cell-lysis step was performed with 50 U/mL lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich). MRSEs from the oxacillin-resistant S. epidermidis strainswere confirmed by detection of the mecA gene, and PCR-based SCCmec typing was carried out with multiplex PCR designed by Kondo et al. [18]. Briefly, two multiplex PCR strategies were used. The mec class (A, B, or C) was identified by the M-PCR1reaction, and the type of ccr complex (ccrAB1, ccrAB2, ccrAB3, ccrAB4, or ccrC) was determined by the M-PCR2 reaction. DNA amplification was carried out in a Mastercycler gradient (Eppendorf, Germany) using Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio, Japan).

Sequencing and analysis

The ccrA2 and ccrB2 genes of SCCmec type IV MRSE and MRSA strains were amplified with the specific primer sets described by Hanssen et al. [11], and the PCR products were sequenced by Bionics (Korea). Sequence data were compared by the ClustalV method using the DNAstar software (USA). A phylogenetic tree of the ccr genes was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using the Mega 3.1 software [21]. The topologies of the phylogenetic trees were evaluated by bootstrap analyses with 1,000 replicates, which yielded confidence intervals for each node on the phylogenetic trees. The following reference sequences were used in the phylogenetic analyses: ccrA2 and ccrB2 from S. aureus N315 (GenBank accession no. D86934), and ccrA3 and ccrB3 from S. aureus 85/2082 (GenBank accession no.AB037671) [6].

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis

MLST analysis of the MRSE isolates was performed as described by Thomas et al. [32]. Alleles at seven loci (arcC, aroE, gtr, mutS, pyrR, tpi, and yqiL) were assigned by comparing the sequences with those of the known alleles in the S. epidermidis MLST database [16]. The allele numbers at each of the seven loci were used to define the allelic profile of each isolate, and each allelic profile was taken as a different sequence type (ST). To group the STs and identify the patterns of evolutionary descent, data from the isolates were analyzed using the eBURST program available on the MLST website [16]. Grouping was carried out using the most stringent definition, which defined a group as having members that all shared identical alleles at more than six loci with at least one other member of the group.

Results

Identification of MRSE from animal sources

A total of 42 S. epidermidis strains were isolated and the isolation rates of S. epidermidis were 2.5%, 5.3% and 6.2% among samples collected from bovine milk, chicken and dogs, respectively. Among the 42 S. epidermidis, 19 strains (45.2%) were identified as MRSE based on their resistance to oxacillin and their possession of the mecA gene (Table 1). According to the origin, the MRSE detection rates were 42.9% (9 out of 21 bovine strains), 40% (4 out of 10 chicken strains) and 54.5% (6 out of 11 canine strains), respectively.
Table 1

Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of MRSE isolates from animal sources

*Localization of the essential genes in the mec gene complex was estimated by PCR and sequencing. The mecA gene and its regulator genes, mecR1 [both the membrane spanning region (MS) and the penicillin-binding region (PB)] and mecI were identified. K: kanamycin, AM: ampicillin, P: penicillin, GM: gentamicin, E: erythromycin, TE: tetracycline, NT: not typable.

Antimicrobial resistance of MRSE

The oxacillin MICs for the 19 MRSE isolates were1 µg/mL or more. The animal MRSE isolates were highly resistant to ampicillin (73.7%) and penicillin (73.7%). Resistance to kanamycin (68.4%), erythromycin (42.1%), gentamicin (63.2%), and tetracycline (42.1%) was also observed (Table 1). All MRSE isolates were susceptible to amikacin, amoxicillin, cephalothin, and vancomycin. Nine of the MRSE isolates (47.4%) showed multidrug resistance patterns (2 bovine strains, 22.2%; 3 chicken strains, 75.0%; 4 canine strains, 66.7%) of resistance to three or more antimicrobials other than β-lactams (Table 1).

Identification of ccrAB genes and mec gene complexes

The SCCmec types of the MRSE strains were defined by determining the ccrAB types and mec gene complex classes. Sequence analysis confirmed that 16MRSE isolates were ccrAB type 2, and the majority (14/19, 73.7%) of these harbored class B mec gene complexes (Table 1). One canine MRSE strain possessed SCCmec type II, and four MRSE strains (10.5%, 2 bovine and 2 canine strains) could not be typed.

MLST analysis

The MRSE strains isolated from different animal origins (bovine milk, chickens, and dogs) showed different MLST patterns, although some belonged to the common MLST type, ST57. While all four of the MRSE isolates from chickens were type ST57, three MLST types (ST5, 20, and 57) and four MLST types (ST2, 20, 57, and 64) were identified in MRSE isolates from bovine milk and dogs, respectively. Four of the five MLST types identified in the animal MRSE isolates could be divided into two groups using the eBURST: group 1 included ST2 and ST20; group 2 contained ST5 and ST57; and ST64 existed as a singleton. Most of the MRSE strains isolated from bovine milk and chickens belonged to group 2, while those isolated from dogs were part of group 1.

ccrA2 and ccrB2 sequence alignment

As the most prevalent type of SCCmec was type IV, the ccrAB sequences of those strains were selected for comparison to the bovine MRSA sequences. The ccrA2 and ccrB2 sequences of 16 SCCmec type IV-MRSE and 25 SCCmec type IV-bovine MRSA strains were aligned and phylogenetic trees were constructed (Fig. 1). The sequence homology of ccrA2 and ccrB2 genes between the MRSE and MRSA was found to be 95~100% and 95.4~100%, respectively.
Fig. 1

Parsimony trees showing phylogenetic relationships among the ccrA2 (A) and ccrB2 (B) genes in MRSE and MRSA isolated from animal sources. Sequences from Staphylococcus (S.) aureus ccrA3 (A; GenBank accession no. AB037671) and S. aureus ccrB3 (B; GenBank accession no. AB037671) were used as outgroups.

The tree for ccrA2 showed that MRSA and MRSE belong to separate groups, except for MRSE S2~27 (belongs to ccraSA1) and MRSE BM8 (does not belong to any group) (Fig. 1A). Similarly, the tree for ccrB2 showed that MRSA and MRSE belong to separate groups except for MRSE A2~7 (belongs to ccrbSA1) and N315 (belongs to ccrbSE1) (Fig. 1B).

Discussion

Although the prevalence of S. epidermidis was not high (2.5%) in bovine milk samples, we found high methicillinresistance rates (40%, 42.9% and 54.5%) among the isolates, regardless of origin. Moreover, almost half of the MRSE isolates (47.4%) showed multidrug resistance patterns. The high detection rates of MR-CNS were also reported in previous studies. In Norway, 70 ~ 80% of CNS isolated from hospitals was methicillin-resistant, while the rate of MRSA was low [11]. Among animals, a 65.2% mecA detection rate was observed in isolates from sheep, goats, pigs, and chicken samples [35]. In Japan, MR-CNS was isolated from healthy horses with a 27% detection rate [34]. The high prevalence of mecA among CNS strains suggests that they may serve as a reservoir for antibiotic-resistant genes that can be transferred to other Gram-positive organisms, including S. aureus [26]. In addition, the multidrug resistant MRSEs pose a public health threat because they make treatment of infections difficult [36]. The most frequent SCCmec type detected in MRSE isolates was type IV, which is characterized by ccrAB type 2 and the class B mec gene complex. SCCmec type IV is often found in community-acquired MRSA among humans [3,10], as well as in animal MRSA [23]. SCCmec type IV is much smaller than that of other SCCmec elements, perhaps increasing its mobility and propensity for horizontal transfer to the diverse genetic backgrounds of Staphylococcus strains [1]. SCCmec type IV has been associated with a comparatively large number of STs, implying that the same SCCmec complex might be horizontally inserted into diverse genetic backgrounds [9]. Consistent with these previous reports, we found that four MLST types (ST 5, 20, 57 and 64) were associated with SCCmec type IV [24,31]. Because the ccr complex determines the site specificity of the SCCmec complex, the sequence similarities of ccrA and ccrB genes are important for the mobility of SCCmec between different strains or species [7,13,29]. In our ccrAB gene sequence analysis, we observed the relative distance between bovine MRSA strains and bovine, canine, and chicken MRSE strains. The ccrAB2 alleles were generally conserved among their own species, while most of the MRSE sequences, (including the bovine sequences) clustered together separate from bovine MRSA. Only a few MRSE strains showed ccrAB sequences similar to those of the bovine MRSA sequences. Surprisingly, the few MRSE strains that resembled bovine MRSA originated from canines or chickens, not from bovine sources. These findings indicate that the bovine MRSA strains might not acquire their SCCmec sequences from bovine MRSE, but rather from other sources. Moreover, the distinct clustering of the MRSA and MRSE groups may suggest that the horizontal transfer of SCCmec between S. epidermidis and S. aureus might not be a frequent event. There were ccr genes of MRSE strains that were clustered in the same group even though they originated from different regions and years. However, few MRSE strains showed 100% homology, despite their relative closeness to each other when compared with other MRSA strains, implying that those MRSE strains obtained their SCCmec complexes independently. However, it is also possible that these results reflect 1) clonal distribution of a few dominant MRSE strains and 2) intra-species SCCmec horizontal transfer. To confirm the source of SCCmec of MRSE strains of this study, more comprehensive analysis of SCCmec complex and genetic comparison with methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis strains isolated together should be conducted using tools such as sequencing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis. In sum, our investigations revealed a high methicillin-resistance rate among animal-originating MRSE strains, indicating that animals infected with MRSE could be reservoirs for human infection through contact with animals or food products. Since direct evidence of the horizontal transfer of SCCmec between S. epidermidis and S. aureus in bovine isolates has not yet been found, further investigations of the horizontal transfer and source of SCCmec should be performed to prevent the spread of MRSE and MRSA infection.
  34 in total

1.  In-vivo transfer of mecA DNA to Staphylococcus aureus [corrected].

Authors:  C L Wielders; M R Vriens; S Brisse; L A de Graaf-Miltenburg; A Troelstra; A Fleer; F J Schmitz; J Verhoef; A C Fluit
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparative molecular analysis of community- or hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P D Fey; B Saïd-Salim; M E Rupp; S H Hinrichs; D J Boxrud; C C Davis; B N Kreiswirth; P M Schlievert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibiotic susceptibility of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis.

Authors:  M Bochniarz; W Wawron
Journal:  Pol J Vet Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.821

4.  Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community.

Authors:  Keiko Okuma; Kozue Iwakawa; John D Turnidge; Warren B Grubb; Jan M Bell; Frances G O'Brien; Geoffrey W Coombs; John W Pearman; Fred C Tenover; Maria Kapi; Chuntima Tiensasitorn; Teruyo Ito; Keiichi Hiramatsu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Ito; Y Katayama; K Asada; N Mori; K Tsutsumimoto; C Tiensasitorn; K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  The emergence and evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K Hiramatsu; L Cui; M Kuroda; T Ito
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.079

7.  A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Y Katayama; T Ito; K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA.

Authors:  Tadashi Baba; Fumihiko Takeuchi; Makoto Kuroda; Harumi Yuzawa; Ken-ichi Aoki; Akio Oguchi; Yoshimi Nagai; Natsuko Iwama; Kazuyuki Asano; Timothy Naimi; Hiroko Kuroda; Longzhu Cui; Kenji Yamamoto; Keiichi Hiramatsu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Infection and/or colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE).

Authors:  C Rabaud; G Mauuary
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2001-12

Review 10.  Staphylococcal resistance revisited: community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus--an emerging problem for the management of skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  E Anne Eady; Jonathan H Cove
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.915

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) Types in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) Species.

Authors:  Huda Saber; Azmiza Syawani Jasni; Tengku Zetty Maztura Tengku Jamaluddin; Rosni Ibrahim
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-26

2.  The SCCmec Types and Antimicrobial Resistance among Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Species Isolated from Dogs with Superficial Pyoderma.

Authors:  Yuttana Chanayat; Areerath Akatvipat; Jeff B Bender; Veerasak Punyapornwithaya; Tongkorn Meeyam; Usanee Anukool; Duangporn Pichpol
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.