| Literature DB >> 23819088 |
Asim M Makhdom1, Simon Garceau, Ronald Dimentberg.
Abstract
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a significant source of morbidity in orthopaedic surgery. It can progress to a pulmonary embolism, a significant source of mortality. Up to date, patients with Achilles tendon rupture routinely do not receive DVT chemical prophylaxis. We are presenting a case of fatal pulmonary embolism after a surgically treated Achilles tendon rupture in a forty-two-year-old male healthy patient. In the current body of the literature, the reported incidence of DVT after Achilles tendon rupture is highly variable ranging from less than 1% to 34%, and there is a disagreement in the international guidelines regarding the need of chemical DVT prophylaxis with this type of injury. Further research needs to be conducted to investigate the risks and benefits of chemical DVT prophylaxis following Achilles tendon rupture. For low-risk patients, the use of milder forms of prophylaxis such as aspirin should also be explored.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23819088 PMCID: PMC3683453 DOI: 10.1155/2013/401968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Orthop ISSN: 2090-6757
Reported incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients treated surgically (S) and nonsurgically (N-S) for Achilles tendon rupture.
| Author(s) and date of publication | Number of patients included in the study | Surgical intervention (S)/nonsurgical intervention (N-S) | Incidence of deep vein thrombosis (%) | Incidence of pulmonary embolism (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lo et al. (1997) [ | 949 | S = 701/N-S = 248 | S = 0.14/N-S = 1.6 | S = 0/N-S = 0.40 |
| Ingvar et al. (2005) [ | 196 | N-S = 196 | N-S = 3.6 | N-S = 0.51 |
| Lapidus et al. (2007) [ | 91 | S = 91 | S = 35 | S = 0 |
| Nilsson-Helander et al. (2009) [ | 95 | S = 49/N-S = 46 | S = 34 | S = 3.2 |
| Healy et al. (2010) [ | 208 | S = 208 | S = 6.3 | S = 2.4 |
| Saragas and Ferrao (2011) [ | 88 | S = 88 | S = 5.7 | S = 1.1 |
| Patel et al. (2012) [ | 1172 | S = 472/N-S = 700 | S = 0.42/N-S = 0.43 | S = 0.21/N-S = 0.43 |
| Makhdom et al. (2013) [ | 115 | S = 115 | S = 23.47 | S = 0.8 |