Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Post-colonoscopy recommendations after inadequate bowel preparation: all in the timing.

Literature DB >> 23817926

Post-colonoscopy recommendations after inadequate bowel preparation: all in the timing.

Benjamin Lebwohl, Alfred I Neugut.

Abstract

Entities: Chemical Disease Species

Mesh：

Substances：
Cathartics

Year: 2013 PMID： 23817926 PMCID： PMC3755877 DOI： 10.1007/s10620-013-2758-y

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dig Dis Sci ISSN： 0163-2116 Impact factor: 3.199

× No keyword cloud information.

20 in total

Review 1. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors: David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 22.682

2. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors: Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Thomas Hollander; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 9.427

3. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.

Authors: Ann G Zauber; Sidney J Winawer; Michael J O'Brien; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benjamin F Hankey; Weiji Shi; John H Bond; Melvin Schapiro; Joel F Panish; Edward T Stewart; Jerome D Waye
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245

4. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors: Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 9.427

5. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.

Authors: Gavin C Harewood; Virender K Sharma; Pat de Garmo
Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.427

6. Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors: Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Graham A Colditz; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 3.199

7. Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey.

Authors: Grace Clarke Hillyer; Corey H Basch; Benjamin Lebwohl; Charles E Basch; Fay Kastrinos; Beverly J Insel; Alfred I Neugut
Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2012-08-12 Impact factor: 2.571

Post-colonoscopy recommendations after inadequate bowel preparation: all in the timing.

Review 1. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

2. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

3. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.

4. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

5. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.

6. Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

7. Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey.

8. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

9. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

10. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality.

Review 1. Adjuncts to colonic cleansing before colonoscopy.

Review 2. What is the best strategy for successful bowel preparation under special conditions?