Literature DB >> 23817285

Cost effectiveness analysis for nursing research.

Mark E Bensink1, Linda H Eaton, Megan L Morrison, Wendy A Cook, R Randall Curtis, Deborah B Gordon, Anjana Kundu, Ardith Z Doorenbos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With ever-increasing pressure to reduce costs and increase quality, nurses are faced with the challenge of producing evidence that their interventions and care provide value. Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a tool that can be used to provide this evidence by comparative evaluation of the costs and consequences of two or more alternatives.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to introduce the essential components of CEA to nurses and nurse researchers with the protocol of a recently funded cluster randomized controlled trial as an example.
METHODS: This article provides (a) a description of the main concepts and key steps in CEA and (b) a summary of the background and objectives of a CEA designed to evaluate a nursing-led pain and symptom management intervention in rural communities compared with the current usual care. DISCUSSION: As the example highlights, incorporating CEA into nursing research studies is feasible. The burden of the additional data collection required is offset by quantitative evidence of the given intervention's cost and impact using humanistic and economic outcomes. At a time when U.S. healthcare is moving toward accountable care, the information provided by CEA will be an important additional component of the evidence produced by nursing research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23817285      PMCID: PMC3706029          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318298b0be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  34 in total

Review 1.  How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?

Authors:  S G Thompson; J A Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Access to health care for the rural elderly.

Authors:  T C Rosenthal; C Fox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies.

Authors:  W J Furlong; D H Feeny; G W Torrance; R D Barr
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  New physicians, the Affordable Care Act, and the changing practice of medicine.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Health care cost and value: the way forward.

Authors:  Laurence F McMahon; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  QALYs: the basics.

Authors:  Milton C Weinstein; George Torrance; Alistair McGuire
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Payment reform for primary care within the accountable care organization: a critical issue for health system reform.

Authors:  Allan H Goroll; Stephen C Schoenbaum
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; K Kroenke; J B Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  US approaches to physician payment: the deconstruction of primary care.

Authors:  Robert A Berenson; Eugene C Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Statistical methods for cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from cluster randomized trials: a systematic review and checklist for critical appraisal.

Authors:  Manuel Gomes; Richard Grieve; Richard Nixon; W J Edmunds
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development and implementation of a telehealth-enhanced intervention for pain and symptom management.

Authors:  Linda H Eaton; Debra B Gordon; Sheryl Wyant; Brian R Theodore; Alexa R Meins; Tessa Rue; Cara Towle; David Tauben; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Quantity and Quality of Economic Evaluations in U.S. Nursing Research, 1997-2015: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Wendy A Cook; Megan L Morrison; Linda H Eaton; Brian R Theodore; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Methodological challenges collecting parent phone-call healthcare utilization data.

Authors:  Paula Moreau; Sybil Crawford; Susan Sullivan-Bolyai
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.257

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.