Literature DB >> 26856491

Methodological challenges collecting parent phone-call healthcare utilization data.

Paula Moreau1, Sybil Crawford2, Susan Sullivan-Bolyai3.   

Abstract

Recommendations by the National Institute of Nursing Research and other groups have strongly encouraged nurses to pay greater attention to cost-effectiveness analysis when conducting research. Given the increasing prominence of translational science and comparative effective research, cost-effective analysis has become a basic tool in determining intervention value in research. Tracking phone-call communication (number of calls and context) with cross-checks between parents and healthcare providers is an example of this type of healthcare utilization data collection. This article identifies some methodological challenges that have emerged in the process of collecting this type of data in a randomized controlled trial: Parent education Through Simulation-Diabetes (PETS-D). We also describe ways in which those challenges have been addressed with comparison data results, and make recommendations for future research.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Cost-effective analysis; Healthcare utilization data; Methodological challenges; Randomized controlled trial; Smartphone applications

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26856491      PMCID: PMC4748174          DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Nurs Res        ISSN: 0897-1897            Impact factor:   2.257


  25 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluations and usefulness of standardized nursing terminologies.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Nam-Ju Lee; Melinna Giannini; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Int J Nurs Terminol Classif       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy.

Authors:  Aman Bhandari; Todd Wagner
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Pediatric telephone call centers: how do they affect health care use and costs?

Authors:  Maya Bunik; Judith E Glazner; Vijayalaxmi Chandramouli; Caroline Bublitz Emsermann; Teresa Hegarty; Allison Kempe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions.

Authors:  Douglas K Owens; Amir Qaseem; Roger Chou; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Effects of accurate expectations and behavioral instructions on reactions during a noxious medical examination.

Authors:  J E Johnson; H Leventhal
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1974-05

6.  Testing the theoretical framework of the COPE program for mothers of critically ill children: an integrative model of young children's post-hospital adjustment behaviors.

Authors:  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Hugh F Crean; Nancy Fischbeck Feinstein; Eileen Fairbanks; Linda J Alpert-Gillis
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2006-10-14

7.  A national profile of health care utilization and expenditures for children with special health care needs.

Authors:  Paul W Newacheck; Sue E Kim
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2005-01

Review 8.  The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians' work practices and patient care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mirela Prgomet; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Barriers and strategies for recruiting study participants in clinical settings.

Authors:  Susan Sullivan-Bolyai; Carol Bova; Janet A Deatrick; Kathy Knafl; Margaret Grey; Katherine Leung; Allison Trudeau
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  Health care utilization: measurement using primary care records and patient recall both showed bias.

Authors:  Kelvin Jordan; Clare Jinks; Peter Croft
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.