Literature DB >> 23816839

Ethnicity-specific birthweight distributions improve identification of term newborns at risk for short-term morbidity.

Gillian E Hanley1, Patricia A Janssen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether ethnicity-specific birthweight distributions more accurately identify newborns at risk for short-term neonatal morbidity associated with small for gestational age (SGA) birth than population-based distributions not stratified on ethnicity. STUDY
DESIGN: We examined 100,463 singleton term infants born to parents in Washington State between Jan. 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2008. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we compared the ability of an ethnicity-specific growth distribution and a population-based growth distribution to predict which infants were at increased risk for Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, ventilation, extended length of stay in hospital, hypothermia, hypoglycemia, and infection.
RESULTS: Newborns considered SGA by ethnicity-specific weight distributions had the highest rates of each of the adverse outcomes assessed-more than double those of infants only considered SGA by the population-based standards. When controlling for mother's age, parity, body mass index, education, gestational age, mode of delivery, and marital status, newborns considered SGA by ethnicity-specific birthweight distributions were between 2 and 7 times more likely to suffer from the adverse outcomes listed above than infants who were not SGA. In contrast, newborns considered SGA by population-based birthweight distributions alone were at no higher risk of any adverse outcome except hypothermia (adjusted odds ratio, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-4.55) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.67).
CONCLUSION: Ethnicity-specific birthweight distributions were significantly better at identifying the infants at higher risk of short-term neonatal morbidity, suggesting that their use could save resources and unnecessary parental anxiety.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethnicity; fetal growth; small for gestational age

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23816839     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Risk of Gestational Diabetes Among South Asian Immigrants Living in New Jersey--a Retrospective Data Review.

Authors:  Acharyya Sanchalika; Janevic Teresa
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-03-19

2.  Comparing Birth Outcomes in Hawai'i between US- and Foreign-Born Women.

Authors:  Sunja Kim; Seemoon Choi; Jane J Chung-Do; Victoria Y Fan
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2018-08

3.  Risk of adverse outcomes among infants of immigrant women according to birth-weight curves tailored to maternal world region of origin.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Howard Berger; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Small-for-gestational age and large-for-gestational age thresholds to predict infants at risk of adverse delivery and neonatal outcomes: are current charts adequate? An observational study from the Born in Bradford cohort.

Authors:  T Norris; W Johnson; D Farrar; D Tuffnell; J Wright; N Cameron
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Does the impact of a plant-based diet during pregnancy on birth weight differ by ethnicity? A dietary pattern analysis from a prospective Canadian birth cohort alliance.

Authors:  Michael A Zulyniak; Russell J de Souza; Mateen Shaikh; Dipika Desai; Diana L Lefebvre; Milan Gupta; Julie Wilson; Gita Wahi; Padmaja Subbarao; Allan B Becker; Piush Mandhane; Stuart E Turvey; Joseph Beyene; Stephanie Atkinson; Katherine M Morrison; Sarah McDonald; Koon K Teo; Malcolm R Sears; Sonia S Anand
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Swedish intrauterine growth reference ranges of biometric measurements of fetal head, abdomen and femur.

Authors:  Linda Lindström; Mårten Ageheim; Ove Axelsson; Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb; Alkistis Skalkidou; Eva Bergman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Blencowe; Julia Krasevec; Mercedes de Onis; Robert E Black; Xiaoyi An; Gretchen A Stevens; Elaine Borghi; Chika Hayashi; Diana Estevez; Luca Cegolon; Suhail Shiekh; Victoria Ponce Hardy; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 26.763

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.