PURPOSE: National guidelines recommend adjuvant intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy for higher-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Although a survival benefit has not been demonstrated, randomized trials have shown reduced recurrence and delayed progression after its use. We investigated predictors of BCG receipt and its association with survival for older patients with NMIBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified individuals with NMIBC registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database from 1991 to 2003. We used logistic regression to compare those treated with BCG within 6 months of initial diagnosis with those not treated, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to analyze the association between BCG and overall survival (OS) and bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS) for the entire cohort and within tumor grades. RESULTS: Of 23,932 patients with NMIBC identified, 22% received adjuvant intravesical BCG. Predictors of receipt were stages Tis and T1, higher grade, and urban residence. Age > 80 years, fewer than two comorbidities, and not being married were associated with decreased use. In the survival analysis, BCG use was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.92) in the entire cohort and BCSS among higher-grade cancers (poorly differentiated: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.85; undifferentiated: HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.77). CONCLUSION: Despite guidelines recommending its use, BCG is administered to less than one quarter of eligible patients. This large population-based study found improved OS and BCSS were associated with use of adjuvant intravesical BCG among older patients with NMIBC. Better-designed clinical trials focusing on higher-grade cancers are needed to confirm these findings.
PURPOSE: National guidelines recommend adjuvant intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy for higher-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Although a survival benefit has not been demonstrated, randomized trials have shown reduced recurrence and delayed progression after its use. We investigated predictors of BCG receipt and its association with survival for older patients with NMIBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified individuals with NMIBC registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database from 1991 to 2003. We used logistic regression to compare those treated with BCG within 6 months of initial diagnosis with those not treated, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to analyze the association between BCG and overall survival (OS) and bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS) for the entire cohort and within tumor grades. RESULTS: Of 23,932 patients with NMIBC identified, 22% received adjuvant intravesical BCG. Predictors of receipt were stages Tis and T1, higher grade, and urban residence. Age > 80 years, fewer than two comorbidities, and not being married were associated with decreased use. In the survival analysis, BCG use was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.92) in the entire cohort and BCSS among higher-grade cancers (poorly differentiated: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.85; undifferentiated: HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.77). CONCLUSION: Despite guidelines recommending its use, BCG is administered to less than one quarter of eligible patients. This large population-based study found improved OS and BCSS were associated with use of adjuvant intravesical BCG among older patients with NMIBC. Better-designed clinical trials focusing on higher-grade cancers are needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: Joan L Warren; Linda C Harlan; Angela Fahey; Beth A Virnig; Jean L Freeman; Carrie N Klabunde; Gregory S Cooper; Kevin B Knopf Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Anna Orsola; Lluís Cecchini; Carles X Raventós; Enric Trilla; Jacques Planas; Stefania Landolfi; Inés de Torres; Juan Morote Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Kang Su Cho; Tae-Kon Hwang; Bup Wan Kim; Duck Ki Yoon; Sung-Goo Chang; Se Joong Kim; Jong Yeon Park; Jun Cheon; Gyung Tak Sung; Sung Joon Hong Journal: Urology Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Andrew T Lenis; Nicholas M Donin; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal; Julie Lai; Jan M Hanley; Badrinath R Konety; Karim Chamie Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Ashish M Kamat; Thomas W Flaig; H Barton Grossman; Badrinath Konety; Donald Lamm; Michael A O'Donnell; Edward Uchio; Jason A Efstathiou; John A Taylor Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Rick Bangs; Stephen A Boorjian; Mark K Buyyounouski; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas W Flaig; Terence Friedlander; Richard E Greenberg; Khurshid A Guru; Noah Hahn; Harry W Herr; Christopher Hoimes; Brant A Inman; A Karim Kader; Adam S Kibel; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff Michalski; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lance C Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Daniel Petrylak; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Wade J Sexton; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Guru Sonpavde; Jonathan Tward; Geoffrey Wile; Mary A Dwyer; Courtney Smith Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ofer N Gofrit; Benjamin Y Klein; Irun R Cohen; Tamir Ben-Hur; Charles L Greenblatt; Hervé Bercovier Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stephen B Williams; Lauren E Howard; Meagan L Foster; Zachary Klaassen; Jan Sieluk; Amanda M De Hoedt; Stephen J Freedland Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Tullika Garg; Amanda J Young; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Carmit K McMullen; Matthew E Nielsen; H Lester Kirchner; Terrence E Murphy Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 6.921