Literature DB >> 11880793

Construct validity of medicare chemotherapy claims: the case of 5FU.

Elizabeth B Lamont1, Diane S Lauderdale, Richard L Schilsky, Nicholas A Christakis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The elderly are under represented in clinical trials of cancer therapy and the elderly who are enrolled may be unrepresentative.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Medicare claims data might be used to understand the benefits and tolerance of chemotherapy in the general elderly population, the construct validity of Medicare 5FU claims for elderly colon cancer patients within the SEER-Medicare data set was determined.
METHODS: In this validation study of Medicare chemotherapy claims from the linked the SEER-Medicare data set, the patterns of 5FU chemotherapy claims were evaluated for an incident cohort of elderly colon cancer patients (n = 15,039) during the 13 months following their diagnosis. Patterns of Medicare National Claims History (NCH) 5FU claims were evaluated with respect to prespecified patient-level disease and demographic factors from the data set.
RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of patients had at least one detectable 5FU claim during the observation period. Among those patients, the median dose of 5FU was 1000 mg, the median interval between 5FU claims was 7 days, and the median number of claims during this period was 24. Multivariate regression revealed expected associations between demographic and disease factors and the likelihood of having a Medicare NCH 5FU claim. With increasing cancer stage, patients' likelihood of having a 5FU claim increased. Younger patients, married patients, white patients, patients with low comorbidity, and patients living in urban and less impoverished regions were each more likely to have 5FU claims.
CONCLUSION: Because their pattern is consistent with the standard of medical care and with previously described associations with disease and demographic factors, it was concluded that Medicare NCH claims for 5FU administration in the SEER-Medicare data set exhibit construct validity. Criterion validation studies with an external gold standard should be pursued to determine the sensitivity and specificity of chemotherapy codes in the Medicare NCH files.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11880793     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200203000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  27 in total

1.  Validation of electronic data on chemotherapy and hormone therapy use in HMOs.

Authors:  Debra P Ritzwoller; Nikki Carroll; Thomas Delate; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rossetti; Paul A Fishman; Elizabeth T Loggers; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Jennifer Elston-Lafata; Mark C Hornbrook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  External validation of medicare claims for breast cancer chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Lois Dickie; Ronald Darling; Jane M Geraci; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Racial disparities in cancer therapy: did the gap narrow between 1992 and 2002?

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Benjamin D Smith; Elizabeth Wolf; Martin Andersen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Variation in modes of chemotherapy administration for breast carcinoma and association with hospitalization for chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Wenyaw Chan; Sharon Giordano; Jane M Geraci; George L Delclos; Keith Burau; Shenying Fang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Severe genitourinary toxicity following radiation therapy for prostate cancer--how long does it last?

Authors:  Sung Kim; Dirk F Moore; Weichung Shih; Yong Lin; Hui Li; Yu-Hsuan Shao; Shunhua Shen; Grace L Lu-Yao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Effect of a dementia diagnosis on survival of older patients after a diagnosis of breast, colon, or prostate cancer: implications for cancer care.

Authors:  Mukaila A Raji; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jean L Freeman; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-13

7.  Measuring clinically significant chemotherapy-related toxicities using Medicare claims from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial participants.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; James E Herndon; Jane C Weeks; I Craig Henderson; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Richard L Schilsky; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Predictors of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced common solid cancers.

Authors:  Isaac E Hall; Martin S Andersen; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-16

9.  Intended versus inferred management after PET for cancer restaging: analysis of Medicare claims linked to a coverage with evidence development registry.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Yunjie Song; Tracy Onega; Lucy G Hanna; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Esophagectomy compared with chemoradiation for early stage esophageal cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Julian A Abrams; Donna L Buono; Joshua Strauss; Russell B McBride; Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.