PURPOSE: Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is a new MRI technology allowing the detection of low concentration endogenous cellular proteins and metabolites indirectly through their exchangeable protons. A new technique, variable delay multi-pulse CEST (VDMP-CEST), is proposed to eliminate the need for recording full Z-spectra and performing asymmetry analysis to obtain CEST contrast. METHODS: The VDMP-CEST scheme involves acquiring images with two (or more) delays between radiofrequency saturation pulses in pulsed CEST, producing a series of CEST images sensitive to the speed of saturation transfer. Subtracting two images or fitting a time series produces CEST and relayed-nuclear Overhauser enhancement CEST maps without effects of direct water saturation and, when using low radiofrequency power, minimal magnetization transfer contrast interference. RESULTS: When applied to several model systems (bovine serum albumin, crosslinked bovine serum albumin, l-glutamic acid) and in vivo on healthy rat brain, VDMP-CEST showed sensitivity to slow to intermediate range magnetization transfer processes (rate < 100-150 Hz), such as amide proton transfer and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement-CEST. Images for these contrasts could be acquired in short scan times by using a single radiofrequency frequency. CONCLUSIONS: VDMP-CEST provides an approach to detect CEST effect by sensitizing saturation experiments to slower exchange processes without interference of direct water saturation and without need to acquire Z-spectra and perform asymmetry analysis.
PURPOSE: Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is a new MRI technology allowing the detection of low concentration endogenous cellular proteins and metabolites indirectly through their exchangeable protons. A new technique, variable delay multi-pulse CEST (VDMP-CEST), is proposed to eliminate the need for recording full Z-spectra and performing asymmetry analysis to obtain CEST contrast. METHODS: The VDMP-CEST scheme involves acquiring images with two (or more) delays between radiofrequency saturation pulses in pulsed CEST, producing a series of CEST images sensitive to the speed of saturation transfer. Subtracting two images or fitting a time series produces CEST and relayed-nuclear Overhauser enhancement CEST maps without effects of direct water saturation and, when using low radiofrequency power, minimal magnetization transfer contrast interference. RESULTS: When applied to several model systems (bovineserum albumin, crosslinked bovineserum albumin, l-glutamic acid) and in vivo on healthy rat brain, VDMP-CEST showed sensitivity to slow to intermediate range magnetization transfer processes (rate < 100-150 Hz), such as amide proton transfer and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement-CEST. Images for these contrasts could be acquired in short scan times by using a single radiofrequency frequency. CONCLUSIONS:VDMP-CEST provides an approach to detect CEST effect by sensitizing saturation experiments to slower exchange processes without interference of direct water saturation and without need to acquire Z-spectra and perform asymmetry analysis.
Authors: Xiaolei Song; Assaf A Gilad; Suresh Joel; Guanshu Liu; Amnon Bar-Shir; Yajie Liang; Michael Gorelik; James J Pekar; Peter C M van Zijl; Jeff W M Bulte; Michael T McMahon Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Craig K Jones; Daniel Polders; Jun Hua; He Zhu; Hans J Hoogduin; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter Luijten; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Robin A de Graaf; Peter B Brown; Scott McIntyre; Terence W Nixon; Kevin L Behar; Douglas L Rothman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kannie W Y Chan; Michael T McMahon; Yoshinori Kato; Guanshu Liu; Jeff W M Bulte; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Dmitri Artemov; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Tina M Burton; Shanshan Jiang; Yansong Zhao; Peter C M van Zijl; Richard Leigh; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Daniel Paech; Constantin Dreher; Sebastian Regnery; Jan-Eric Meissner; Steffen Goerke; Johannes Windschuh; Johanna Oberhollenzer; Miriam Schultheiss; Katerina Deike-Hofmann; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Alexander Radbruch; Moritz Zaiss; Andreas Unterberg; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Peter Bachert; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lin Chen; Xiang Xu; Haifeng Zeng; Kannie W Y Chan; Nirbhay Yadav; Shuhui Cai; Kathryn J Schunke; Nauder Faraday; Peter C M van Zijl; Jiadi Xu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Eugene C Lin; Hua Li; Zhongliang Zu; Elizabeth A Louie; Christopher L Lankford; Richard D Dortch; Mark D Does; John C Gore; Daniel F Gochberg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hua Li; Zhongliang Zu; Moritz Zaiss; Imad S Khan; Robert J Singer; Daniel F Gochberg; Peter Bachert; John C Gore; Junzhong Xu Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-12-07 Impact factor: 4.044