Literature DB >> 23813178

Two-stage revision of an infected total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 136 patients.

Marcus P J van Diemen1, Sascha Colen, Alain A R Dalemans, Jose Stuyck, Michiel Mulier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Periprosthetic infection of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly treated with a two-stage revision procedure. After resection of the infected THA and placement of a cement spacer loaded with antibiotics, a THA is inserted at a second procedure to restore hip function and mobility. Revision surgery carries a significant risk of complications. This study focuses on hip function, rate of complications and reinfection after two-stage revision surgery for an infected THA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to April 2010, 136 patients underwent revision surgery after removal of an infected THA. Follow-up ranged from 2 years to more than 15 years. Hip function was evaluated using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measured pain. Annual follow-up included radiographs of the affected hip and blood sampling for inflammatory parameters.
RESULTS: After revision surgery, average mHHS was 63% and average HOOS was 54%. VAS pain averaged 26.8 on a 100-point scale and 40% of patients had no pain. Prosthesis-related complications unrelated to sepsis occurred in 32%. Most common were periprosthetic fractures, leg length discrepancy and dislocation. Reinfection occurred in 13% of these patients and Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CNS) was isolated in 67%.
CONCLUSION: Two-stage evision surgery is an accepted treatment for infected THAs. However, complications are common and hip function afterwards is modest. As previous studies have shown, CNS is an important microorganism in reinfection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813178     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  13 in total

1.  Is two-stage reimplantation effective for virulent pathogenic infection in a periprosthetic hip? A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Cheol Yoon; Devendra Lakhotia; Jong-Keon Oh; Jun Gyu Moon; Kumar Prashant; Won Yong Shon
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-18

2.  Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Chronic periprosthetic hip infection: micro-organisms responsible for infection and re-infection.

Authors:  Nikolai M Kliushin; Artem M Ermakov; Tatiana A Malkova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Mechanical evaluation of hip cement spacer reinforcement with stainless steel Kirschner wires, titanium and carbon rods, and stainless steel mesh.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kaku; Tomonori Tabata; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-11-25

5.  Factors associated with infection recurrence after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Fabian Schwolow; Bernd Füchtmeier; Franz Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  2-stage revision recommended for treatment of fungal hip and knee prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Jesse W P Kuiper; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Jurgen van der Stappen; Peter A Nolte; Sascha Colen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Failed Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Caused by Recurrent Candida glabrata Infection with Prior Serratia marcescens Coinfection.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Kendra E Keenan; Wanda S Updike; Marquam R Oliver
Journal:  Case Rep Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 8.  Does cemented or cementless single-stage exchange arthroplasty of chronic periprosthetic hip infections provide similar infection rates to a two-stage? A systematic review.

Authors:  D A George; N Logoluso; G Castellini; S Gianola; S Scarponi; F S Haddad; L Drago; C L Romano
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Clinical evaluation following the use of mineralized collagen graft for bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cheng Huang; Liwu Qin; Wei Yan; Xisheng Weng; Xiangjie Huang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2015-11-11

10.  Results and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) after One-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: A Single-centre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jesse W P Kuiper; Christine M E Rustenburg; Jore H Willems; Steven J Verberne; Edgar J G Peters; Rachid Saouti
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.