Literature DB >> 2381310

The mechanical efficiency of front crawl swimming.

H M Toussaint1, W Knops, G De Groot, A P Hollander.   

Abstract

In this study the gross efficiency of swimming was determined in a group of male (N = 6) and female (N = 4) competitive swimmers. The gross efficiency is defined as the ratio of the power output (W) to the power input (W). In a range of swimming velocities (0.95-1.6 m.s-1), the power input (rate of energy expenditure, 445-1137 W) was calculated from the oxygen uptake values (1.33-3.25 1 O2.min-1). The total power output (26-108 W) was directly measured during front crawl swimming using a system of underwater push-off pads instrumented with a force transducer (MAD-system). Using the MAD-system, the effect on total body drag due to the addition of the respiratory apparatus was evaluated to be negligible. The gross efficiency ranged from 5 to 9.5%. At equal swimming speed, the male competitive swimmers demonstrated a higher gross efficiency. However, this was due to the higher power output required by the male swimmers at a given speed. Gross efficiency was dependent on the absolute power output such that as power output increased so did the calculated gross efficiency. At the same power output, the values for the gross efficiency do not differ between the male and female competitive swimmers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2381310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  14 in total

1.  The determinants of performance in master swimmers: a cross-sectional study on the age-related changes in propelling efficiency, hydrodynamic position and energy cost of front crawl.

Authors:  P Zamparo; A Dall'ora; A Toneatto; M Cortesi; G Gatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Energetics of swimming: a historical perspective.

Authors:  P Zamparo; C Capelli; D Pendergast
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  An energy balance of front crawl.

Authors:  P Zamparo; D R Pendergast; J Mollendorf; A Termin; A E Minetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming.

Authors:  H M Toussaint; P J Beek
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Energy cost of swimming of elite long-distance swimmers.

Authors:  P Zamparo; M Bonifazi; M Faina; A Milan; F Sardella; F Schena; C Capelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effect of the underwater torque on the energy cost, drag and efficiency of front crawl swimming.

Authors:  P Zamparo; C Capelli; B Termin; D R Pendergast; P E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

7.  VO₂ kinetics and metabolic contributions during full and upper body extreme swimming intensity.

Authors:  J Ribeiro; P Figueiredo; A Sousa; J Monteiro; J Pelarigo; J P Vilas-Boas; H M Toussaint; R F Fernandes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  The energy cost of swimming and its determinants.

Authors:  Paola Zamparo; Matteo Cortesi; Giorgio Gatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Energetics of competitive swimming. Implications for training programmes.

Authors:  H M Toussaint; A P Hollander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Interplay of biomechanical, energetic, coordinative, and muscular factors in a 200 m front crawl swim.

Authors:  Pedro Figueiredo; David R Pendergast; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ricardo J Fernandes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.