Literature DB >> 23812829

Body mass index, age, and gender affect prep quality, sedation use, and procedure time during screening colonoscopy.

Jennifer Czwornog1, Gregory L Austin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI), age, and gender influence colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenoma risk. Their effects on colonoscopy characteristics are unclear, but might inform the screening approach in patient subgroups. AIMS: The aims of this study were to assess the effect of BMI, age, and gender on prep quality, amount of sedation, procedure time, and adenoma prevalence for screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: We conducted a review of 773 eligible colonoscopies performed for average-risk CRC screening. We performed multivariable regression analyses to assess the outcomes of prep quality, amount of fentanyl and midazolam used, procedure time, and the adenoma prevalence rate (APR).
RESULTS: Obese patients were less likely (p = 0.01) to have a good or excellent prep, had similar procedure times, and received similar amounts of fentanyl and midazolam. Increasing age had no effect on prep quality or procedure time, but was associated with decreased fentanyl and midazolam (both p ≤ 0.001). Women had similar prep quality, longer procedure times (increased by 2.8 ± 0.7 min, p < 0.001) for colonoscopies in which no polyps were detected, and received more fentanyl and midazolam (both p = 0.01). Increasing BMI, increasing age, and male gender were associated with an increased APR. The APR for women aged 50-59 with a normal BMI was 17.9 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal-weight females, particularly those under age 60, have the lowest APR but have longer procedure times and require higher amounts of sedation. Screening options other than colonoscopy might be well-suited to this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812829     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2746-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  18 in total

1.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Male sex and smoking have a larger impact on the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia than family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Michael Hoffmeister; Stephanie Schmitz; Elisabeth Karmrodt; Christa Stegmaier; Ulrike Haug; Volker Arndt; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 3.  Body mass index category as a risk factor for colorectal adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koji Okabayashi; Hutan Ashrafian; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Jae-Hoon Yoo; Vanash M Patel; Leanne Harling; Simon P Rowland; Mariam Ali; Yuko Kitagawa; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Sedation during endoscopy for patients at risk of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Vijay S Khiani; Wajeeh Salah; Santo Maimone; Linda Cummings; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Kimberly Walker-Thurmond; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Tailoring colorectal cancer screening by considering risk of advanced proximal neoplasia.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Elizabeth A Glowinski; Ching Lin-Cooper; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Factors that predict cecal insertion time during sedated colonoscopy: the role of waist circumference.

Authors:  Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Chin-Sung Kuo; Kuo-Chih Tseng; Hwai-Jeng Lin
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Brian B Borg; Nitin K Gupta; Gary R Zuckerman; Bhaskar Banerjee; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Factors associated with abdominal discomfort during colonoscopy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  David A Elphick; Mark T Donnelly; Karen S Smith; Stuart A Riley
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.566

View more
  6 in total

1.  Screening colonoscopy: still the best choice, but for how long?

Authors:  Yoji Takeuchi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.

Authors:  Katherine B Hagan; Selvi Thirumurthi; Raju Gottumukkala; John Vargo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

3.  Risk factor analysis of additional administration of sedative agent and patient dissatisfaction in intravenous conscious sedation using midazolam for third molar extraction.

Authors:  Dong-Whan Shin; Jin-Yong Cho; Yoon-Sic Han; Hye-Young Sim; Hee-Sun Kim; Da-Un Jung; Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-08-24

4.  Association between investigator-measured body-mass index and colorectal adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 168,201 subjects.

Authors:  Martin Chi-Sang Wong; Chun-Hei Chan; Wilson Cheung; Din-Hei Fung; Miaoyin Liang; Jason Li-Wen Huang; Yan-Hong Wang; Johnny Yu Jiang; Chun-Pong Yu; Harry Haoxiang Wang; Justin Che-Yuen Wu; Francis Ka-Leung Chan; Joseph Jao-Yiu Sung
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Impact of opioid use on patients undergoing screening colonoscopy according to the quality of bowel preparation.

Authors:  Lois Lamerato; Eric Wittbrodt; Manpreet Kaur; Catherine Datto; Sumit Singla
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-12-09

6.  Individual variability in human urinary metabolites identifies age-related, body mass index-related, and sex-related biomarkers.

Authors:  Tianling Wang; Lei Tang; Ruili Lin; Dian He; Yanqing Wu; Yang Zhang; Pingrong Yang; Junquan He
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.