Literature DB >> 20670694

Male sex and smoking have a larger impact on the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia than family history of colorectal cancer.

Michael Hoffmeister1, Stephanie Schmitz, Elisabeth Karmrodt, Christa Stegmaier, Ulrike Haug, Volker Arndt, Hermann Brenner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC) commonly take family history but no other risk factors into account. We compared and assessed risk factors of colorectal polyps in a large population undergoing screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study that included 3349 subjects, 55 years or older (mean ages of men and women, 63.6 and 63.4 years, respectively), who underwent colonoscopy for the first time within the nationwide colonoscopy screening program in Germany. We calculated prevalences of colorectal polyps and estimated multivariate prevalence ratios (PRs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs).
RESULTS: Overall, 654 subjects had hyperplastic polyps (20%), 675 had non-advanced adenomas (20%), 343 had advanced adenomas (10%), and 40 had CRC (1%). Risk factor prevalences and adjusted PRs were higher for male gender and smoking than for family history of CRC. PAFs for prevalence of non-advanced and advanced neoplasia were highest for male gender (23% and 23%, respectively), followed by smoking (7% and 9%, respectively), and family history of CRC (2% and 4%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Male gender and smoking have a larger impact on the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia than family history, suggesting an extensive evaluation of additional risk stratification in population-based screening, particularly by sex.
Copyright © 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20670694     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  35 in total

1.  Smoking and the association of advanced colorectal neoplasia in an asymptomatic average risk population: analysis of exposure and anatomical location in men and women.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Koorosh Moezardalan; Catherine R Messina; Michael Latreille; Robert D Shaw
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Sessile serrated adenomas versus conventional adenomas. Different polyps in different populations?

Authors:  Georgios Michalopoulos; Spyridon Vrakas; Vassiliki Ntouli; Stelios Lamprinakos; Konstantinos Makris; Charalampos Tzathas
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 3.  Do recent epidemiologic observations impact who and how we should screen for CRC?

Authors:  Ethan Bortniker; Joseph C Anderson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  [Comparison of risk factors for serrated polyps and conventional adenoma and the suitable age to start colorectal cancer screening].

Authors:  Qian Dai; Jiang Liu; Mu-Xiao Zhong; Wei Zhu; Ya-Li Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-05-20

5.  Risk Factors for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Eric E Low; Joshua Demb; Lin Liu; Ashley Earles; Ranier Bustamante; Christina D Williams; Dawn Provenzale; Tonya Kaltenbach; Andrew J Gawron; Maria Elena Martinez; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Focus on genetic and epigenetic events of colorectal cancer pathogenesis: implications for molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  Federica Zoratto; Luigi Rossi; Monica Verrico; Anselmo Papa; Enrico Basso; Angelo Zullo; Luigi Tomao; Adriana Romiti; Giuseppe Lo Russo; Silverio Tomao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-28

7.  Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on the prevalence of advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in 4,967 asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Franklin C Tsai; Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Sex is a stronger predictor of colorectal adenoma and advanced adenoma than fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Monika Ferlitsch; Georg Heinze; Petra Salzl; Martha Britto-Arias; Elisabeth Waldmann; Karoline Reinhart; Christina Bannert; Elisabeth Fasching; Peter Knoflach; Werner Weiss; Michael Trauner; Arnulf Ferlitsch
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Differences in epidemiologic risk factors for colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps by lesion severity and anatomical site.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Michael N Passarelli; Scott V Adams; Melissa P Upton; Lee-Ching Zhu; John D Potter; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.