Literature DB >> 23812409

Gallium-68: a systematic review of its nononcological applications.

Mariza Vorster1, Alex Maes, Christophe Van deWiele, Mike Sathekge.   

Abstract

The increased availability of PET facilities worldwide has sparked renewed interest in the use of generator-produced tracers such as gallium-68 (Ga). Imaging with Ga provides exciting opportunities in terms of new ligand-labelling possibilities and the exploration of novel clinical applications. The aim of the study was to summarize and appraise what has been published on the clinical applications of Ga outside oncology practice. This systematic review was based on the PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched include PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The following search strategy was used: 'Ga' OR 'Gallium' (all fields) NOT the following (title and abstract): Oncology/NET/neuroendocrine tumour/tumor/DOTATOC, DOTATATE, DOTANOC. These results were further limited to English publications, which resulted in 205 publications on PubMed. After duplicates and irrelevant articles were removed, 72 publications remained for inclusion. Only those studies in which compounds were labelled with Ga for applications other than in oncology-related indications were included. Publications in which the focus was on oncology-related applications of Ga imaging or in which the emphasis was on aspects relating to generators, radiochemistry or physics were excluded. Although a multitude of tracers have been labelled with Ga over several decades, it has not been established in routine clinical practice yet. In addition, neuroendocrine and other oncological applications have dominated the field until relatively recently following reports of applications in infection and inflammation. The majority of publications to date involve small numbers of subjects in mainly preclinical settings. Differences in methodology preclude grouping of studies to reach a clear conclusion. There is wide scope for Ga tracer application outside oncological practice, which remains greatly underutilized. Larger clinical trials are needed to validate these applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812409     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32836341e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  5 in total

1.  Excellence is the Enemy of Good.

Authors:  John Buscombe
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09

2.  A Comparative 68Ga-Citrate and 68Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia.

Authors:  Petteri Lankinen; Tommi Noponen; Anu Autio; Pauliina Luoto; Janek Frantzèn; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Antti J Hakanen; Hannu T Aro; Anne Roivainen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  68-Gallium DOTATATE scanning in symptomatic patients with negative anatomic imaging but suspected neuroendocrine tumor.

Authors:  Jasmine Shell; Xavier M Keutgen; Corina Millo; Naris Nilubol; Dhaval Patel; Samira Sadowski; Myriem Boufraqech; Lily Yang; Roxanne Merkel; Christine Atallah; Peter Herscovitch; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  Int J Endocr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-02

Review 4.  The Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Paolo Palmisciano; Gina Watanabe; Andie Conching; Christian Ogasawara; Gianluca Ferini; Othman Bin-Alamer; Ali S Haider; Maria Gabriella Sabini; Giacomo Cuttone; Sebastiano Cosentino; Massimo Ippolito; Giuseppe E Umana
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Imaging Hepatocellular Carcinoma With 68Ga-Citrate PET: First Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Spencer C Behr; Youngho Seo; R Kate Kelley; Carlos Corvera; Kenneth T Gao; Rahul Aggarwal; Michael J Evans
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.