BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies suggest that left ventricular (LV) and arterial elastance (stiffness) increase with age, but data examining longitudinal changes within human subjects are lacking. In addition, it remains unknown whether age-related LV stiffening is merely a reaction to arterial stiffening or caused by other processes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Comprehensive echo-Doppler cardiography was performed in 1402 subjects participating in a randomly selected community-based study at 2 examinations separated by 4 years. From this population, 788 subjects had adequate paired data to determine LV end-systolic elastance (Ees), end-diastolic elastance (Eed), and effective arterial elastance. Throughout 4 years, blood pressure, arterial elastance, and LV mass decreased, coupled with significantly greater use of antihypertensive medications. However, despite reductions in arterial load, Ees increased by 14% (2.10±0.67-2.26±0.70 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001) and Eed increased by 8% (0.13±0.03-0.14±0.04 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001). Increases in Eed were greater in women than men, whereas Ees changes were similar. Age-related increases in Ees and Eed were correlated with changes in body weight, but were similar in subjects with or without cardiovascular disease. Changes in Ees were correlated with Eed (r=0.5; P<0.0001), but not with other measures of contractility, indicating that the increase in Ees was reflective of passive stiffening rather than enhanced systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reductions in arterial load with medical therapy, LV systolic and diastolic stiffness increase over time in humans, particularly in women. In addition to blood pressure control, therapies targeting load-independent ventricular stiffening may be effective to treat and prevent age-associated cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure.
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies suggest that left ventricular (LV) and arterial elastance (stiffness) increase with age, but data examining longitudinal changes within human subjects are lacking. In addition, it remains unknown whether age-related LV stiffening is merely a reaction to arterial stiffening or caused by other processes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Comprehensive echo-Doppler cardiography was performed in 1402 subjects participating in a randomly selected community-based study at 2 examinations separated by 4 years. From this population, 788 subjects had adequate paired data to determine LV end-systolic elastance (Ees), end-diastolic elastance (Eed), and effective arterial elastance. Throughout 4 years, blood pressure, arterial elastance, and LV mass decreased, coupled with significantly greater use of antihypertensive medications. However, despite reductions in arterial load, Ees increased by 14% (2.10±0.67-2.26±0.70 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001) and Eed increased by 8% (0.13±0.03-0.14±0.04 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001). Increases in Eed were greater in women than men, whereas Ees changes were similar. Age-related increases in Ees and Eed were correlated with changes in body weight, but were similar in subjects with or without cardiovascular disease. Changes in Ees were correlated with Eed (r=0.5; P<0.0001), but not with other measures of contractility, indicating that the increase in Ees was reflective of passive stiffening rather than enhanced systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reductions in arterial load with medical therapy, LV systolic and diastolic stiffness increase over time in humans, particularly in women. In addition to blood pressure control, therapies targeting load-independent ventricular stiffening may be effective to treat and prevent age-associated cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure.
Entities:
Keywords:
aging; arterial stiffness; heart failure; hemodynamics; ventricular function
Authors: S R Ommen; R A Nishimura; C P Appleton; F A Miller; J K Oh; M M Redfield; A J Tajik Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Garvan C Kane; Barry L Karon; Douglas W Mahoney; Margaret M Redfield; Veronique L Roger; John C Burnett; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Linda B Piller; Sarah Baraniuk; Lara M Simpson; William C Cushman; Barry M Massie; Paula T Einhorn; Suzanne Oparil; Charles E Ford; James F Graumlich; Richard A Dart; David C Parish; Tamrat M Retta; Aloysius B Cuyjet; Syed Z Jafri; Curt D Furberg; Mohammad G Saklayen; Udho Thadani; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Barry R Davis Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sanjiv J Shah; Dalane W Kitzman; Barry A Borlaug; Loek van Heerebeek; Michael R Zile; David A Kass; Walter J Paulus Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John M Davis; Grace Lin; Jae K Oh; Cynthia S Crowson; Sara J Achenbach; Terry M Therneau; Eric L Matteson; Richard J Rodeheffer; Sherine E Gabriel Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: David Leibowitz; Jonathan Koslowsky; Dan Gilon; Jeremy M Jacobs; Irit Stessman-Lande; Jochanan Stessman Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Yong Seon Choi; Ana Barbosa Marcondes de Mattos; Dan Shao; Tao Li; Miranda Nabben; Maengjo Kim; Wang Wang; Rong Tian; Stephen C Kolwicz Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 5.000