Literature DB >> 23811738

A guide to performing difficult bimanual coordination tasks: just follow the yellow brick road.

Chaoyi Wang1, Deanna M Kennedy, Jason B Boyle, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

Both discrete and continuous bimanual coordination patterns are difficult to effectively perform when the two limbs are required to perform different movements patterns, move at different velocities and/or move different amplitudes unless some form of integrated feedback is provided. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the degree to which a complex bimanual coordination pattern could be performed when integrated feedback and movement template are provided. The complex bimanual coordination pattern involved reciprocal movements of the two limbs under different difficulty requirements. As defined by Fitts' index of difficulty (ID), the left arm (ID = 3, A = 16°, W = 4°) task was of lower difficulty than the right arm task (ID = 5, A = 32°, W = 2°). Note that the left and right limb movements are also different in terms of movement time, movement velocity, accuracy requirements and amplitude as well as one movement was continuous and the other intermittent. Participants were provided 2 blocks of 9 trials in the bimanual condition (30 s/trial). Following the bimanual phase, participants performed two unimanual test trials-one with each limb. The results demonstrated that the performance for each limb in the bimanual condition was similar to the performance for the same limb and conditions in the unimanual control conditions. The similarity was indicated by the same movement speed, movement structure, endpoint variability and hit rates for the bimanual and unimanual conditions. The results support our hypothesis that people can overcome the intrinsic difficulties associated with performing complex bimanual coordination patterns when provided appropriate perceptual information feedback that allows them to detect and correct coordination errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811738     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3628-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.

Authors:  F Mechsner; D Kerzel; G Knoblich; W Prinz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements.

Authors:  Steven W Kennerley; Jörn Diedrichsen; Eliot Hazeltine; Andras Semjen; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback.

Authors:  Filiep Debaere; Nicole Wenderoth; Stefan Sunaert; Paul Van Hecke; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete.

Authors:  Stefan Schaal; Dagmar Sternad; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Perceptual and attentional influences on continuous 2:1 and 3:2 multi-frequency bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; John J Buchanan; Charles H Shea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The learning of 90° continuous relative phase with and without Lissajous feedback: external and internally generated bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-01-08

7.  Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns.

Authors:  R J Fontaine; T D Lee; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1997-03

8.  On the coordination of two-handed movements.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Increasingly complex bimanual multi-frequency coordination patterns are equally easy to perform with on-line relative velocity feedback.

Authors:  Jason Boyles; Stefan Panzer; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Advancing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Using Real-Time Biofeedback for Amplified Sensorimotor Integration.

Authors:  Scott Bonnette; Christopher A DiCesare; Jed A Diekfuss; Dustin R Grooms; Ryan P MacPherson; Michael A Riley; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Do accuracy requirements change bimanual and unimanual control processes similarly?

Authors:  Chaoyi Wang; Jason B Boyle; Boyi Dai; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of salient points in movements on the constraints in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Tetsuro Muraoka; Kento Nakagawa; Kouki Kato; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The simplest acquisition protocol is sometimes the best protocol: performing and learning a 1:2 bimanual coordination task.

Authors:  Stefan Panzer; Deanna Kennedy; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of inherent and incidental constraints on bimanual and social coordination.

Authors:  Yiyu Wang; Osmar Pinto Neto; Madison M Davis; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A novel approach to enhancing limb control in older adults.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Deanna M Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Optimizing the control of high-ID movements: rethinking the power of the visual display.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Stefan Panzer; Chaoyi Wang; Deanna Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Tongue Part Movement Trajectories for /r/ Using Ultrasound.

Authors:  Sarah Dugan; Sarah R Li; Jack Masterson; Hannah Woeste; Neeraja Mahalingam; Caroline Spencer; T Douglas Mast; Michael A Riley; Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-12

10.  Haptic feedback helps bipedal coordination.

Authors:  Eefje G J Roelofsen; Jurjen Bosga; David A Rosenbaum; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Wim Hullegie; Robert van Cingel; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.