Literature DB >> 23811623

Global and regional parameters to visualize the 'best' PEEP during a PEEP trial in a porcine model with and without acute lung injury.

I G Bikker1, P Blankman, P Specht, J Bakker, D Gommers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Setting the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in critically ill patients remains a matter of debate. "Best" PEEP is regarded as minimal lung collapse and overdistention to prevent lung injury. In this study, global and regional variables were evaluated in a porcine model to identify which variables should be used to visualize "best" PEEP.
METHODS: Eight pigs (28-31 kg) were studied during an incremental and decremental PEEP trial before and after the induction of acute lung injury (ALI) with oleic acid. Arterial oxygenation, compliance, lung volume, dead space, esophageal pressure and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) were recorded at the end of each PEEP step.
RESULTS: After ALI, "best" PEEP was comparable at 15 cmH2O between regional compliance of the dorsal lung region by EIT and the global indicators: dynamic compliance, arterial oxygenation, alveolar dead space and venous admixture. After ALI, the intratidal gas distribution was able to detect regional overdistention at 15 cmH2O PEEP. "Best" PEEP based on transpulmonary pressure was lower and no optimal level could be found based on lung volume measurements alone. In addition, the recruitment phase significantly improved end-expiratory lung volume, PaO2, venous admixture and regional and global compliance, both in ALI and the "healthy" lung.
CONCLUSION: Most of the evaluated parameters indicate comparable 'best' PEEP levels. However, a combination of these parameters, and especially EIT-derived intratidal gas distribution, might provide additional information. The application of lung recruitment was beneficial in both ALI and the "healthy" lung.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Antonio Pesenti; Guido Musch; Daniel Lichtenstein; Francesco Mojoli; Marcelo B P Amato; Gilda Cinnella; Luciano Gattinoni; Michael Quintel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Should we titrate peep based on end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure?-yes.

Authors:  Elias Baedorf Kassis; Stephen H Loring; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

3.  Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Hong Ren; Li Xie; Zhulin Wang; Xiaoliao Tang; Botao Ning; Teng Teng; Juan Qian; Ying Wang; Lijun Fu; Zhanqi Zhao; Long Xiang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Lung stress and strain calculations in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  P Blankman; D Hasan; I G Bikker; D Gommers
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 5.  Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS: Aspects to Think about for Better Understanding, Evaluation, and Management.

Authors:  Iuri Christmann Wawrzeniak; Silvia Regina Rios Vieira; Josué Almeida Victorino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Detection of 'best' positive end-expiratory pressure derived from electrical impedance tomography parameters during a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trial.

Authors:  Paul Blankman; Djo Hasan; Groot Erik; Diederik Gommers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Detection of optimal PEEP for equal distribution of tidal volume by volumetric capnography and electrical impedance tomography during decreasing levels of PEEP in post cardiac-surgery patients.

Authors:  P Blankman; A Shono; B J M Hermans; T Wesselius; D Hasan; D Gommers
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.166

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.