Antonio Pesenti1,2, Guido Musch3, Daniel Lichtenstein4, Francesco Mojoli5,6, Marcelo B P Amato7, Gilda Cinnella8, Luciano Gattinoni9, Michael Quintel9. 1. Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenza Urgenza, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy. antonio.pesenti@unimi.it. 2. Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. antonio.pesenti@unimi.it. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University and General Anesthesiology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, USA. 4. Medical ICU, Hospital Ambroise-Pare, Paris-West University, Nanterre, France. 5. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. 6. Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 7. Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 8. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. 9. Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Imaging has become increasingly important across medical specialties for diagnostic, monitoring, and investigative purposes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This review addresses the use of imaging techniques for the diagnosis and management of ARDS as well as gaining knowledge about its pathogenesis and pathophysiology. The techniques described in this article are computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and two easily accessible imaging techniques available at the bedside-ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). RESULTS: The use of computed tomography has provided new insights into ARDS pathophysiology, demonstrating that ARDS does not homogeneously affect the lung parenchyma and that lung injury severity is widely distributed in the ARDS population. Positron emission tomography is a functional imaging technique whose value resides in adding incremental insights to morphological imaging. It can quantify regional perfusion, ventilation, aeration, lung vascular permeability, edema, and inflammation. Lung ultrasound and EIT are radiation-free, noninvasive tools available at the bedside. Lung ultrasound can provide useful information on ARDS diagnosis when x-rays or CT scan are not available. EIT is a useful tool to monitor lung ventilation and to assess the regional distribution of perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The future of imaging in critical care will probably develop in two main directions: easily accessible imaging techniques that can be used at the bedside and sophisticated imaging methods that will be used to aid in difficult diagnostic cases or to advance our understanding of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of an array of critical illnesses.
PURPOSE: Imaging has become increasingly important across medical specialties for diagnostic, monitoring, and investigative purposes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This review addresses the use of imaging techniques for the diagnosis and management of ARDS as well as gaining knowledge about its pathogenesis and pathophysiology. The techniques described in this article are computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and two easily accessible imaging techniques available at the bedside-ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). RESULTS: The use of computed tomography has provided new insights into ARDS pathophysiology, demonstrating that ARDS does not homogeneously affect the lung parenchyma and that lung injury severity is widely distributed in the ARDS population. Positron emission tomography is a functional imaging technique whose value resides in adding incremental insights to morphological imaging. It can quantify regional perfusion, ventilation, aeration, lung vascular permeability, edema, and inflammation. Lung ultrasound and EIT are radiation-free, noninvasive tools available at the bedside. Lung ultrasound can provide useful information on ARDS diagnosis when x-rays or CT scan are not available. EIT is a useful tool to monitor lung ventilation and to assess the regional distribution of perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The future of imaging in critical care will probably develop in two main directions: easily accessible imaging techniques that can be used at the bedside and sophisticated imaging methods that will be used to aid in difficult diagnostic cases or to advance our understanding of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of an array of critical illnesses.
Authors: João Batista Borges; Fernando Suarez-Sipmann; Stephan H Bohm; Gerardo Tusman; Alexandre Melo; Enn Maripuu; Mattias Sandström; Marcelo Park; Eduardo L V Costa; Göran Hedenstierna; Marcelo Amato Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-09-29
Authors: Belaïd Bouhemad; Hélène Brisson; Morgan Le-Guen; Charlotte Arbelot; Qin Lu; Jean-Jacques Rouby Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nicolas de Prost; Yan Feng; Tyler Wellman; Mauro R Tucci; Eduardo L Costa; Guido Musch; Tilo Winkler; R Scott Harris; Jose G Venegas; Wei Chao; Marcos F Vidal Melo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-10-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Nicolas de Prost; Eduardo L Costa; Tyler Wellman; Guido Musch; Mauro R Tucci; Tilo Winkler; R Harris; Jose G Venegas; Brian P Kavanagh; Marcos F Vidal Melo Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: P H Mayo; R Copetti; D Feller-Kopman; G Mathis; E Maury; S Mongodi; F Mojoli; G Volpicelli; M Zanobetti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jacob S Brenner; Kartik Bhamidipati; Patrick M Glassman; N Ramakrishnan; Depeng Jiang; Andrew J Paris; Jacob W Myerson; Daniel C Pan; Vladimir V Shuvaev; Carlos H Villa; Elizabeth D Hood; Raisa Kiseleva; Colin F Greineder; Ravi Radhakrishnan; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Silvia Mongodi; Marco Pozzi; Anita Orlando; Bélaid Bouhemad; Andrea Stella; Guido Tavazzi; Gabriele Via; Giorgio Antonio Iotti; Francesco Mojoli Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Tommaso Mauri; Nilde Eronia; Cecilia Turrini; Marta Battistini; Giacomo Grasselli; Roberto Rona; Carlo Alberto Volta; Giacomo Bellani; Antonio Pesenti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 17.440