To gain insight into adaptations of proteins to their membranes, intrinsic hydrophobic thicknesses, distributions of different chemical groups and profiles of hydrogen-bonding capacities (α and β) and the dipolarity/polarizability parameter (π*) were calculated for lipid-facing surfaces of 460 integral α-helical, β-barrel and peripheral proteins from eight types of biomembranes. For comparison, polarity profiles were also calculated for ten artificial lipid bilayers that have been previously studied by neutron and X-ray scattering. Estimated hydrophobic thicknesses are 30-31Å for proteins from endoplasmic reticulum, thylakoid, and various bacterial plasma membranes, but differ for proteins from outer bacterial, inner mitochondrial and eukaryotic plasma membranes (23.9, 28.6 and 33.5Å, respectively). Protein and lipid polarity parameters abruptly change in the lipid carbonyl zone that matches the calculated hydrophobic boundaries. Maxima of positively charged protein groups correspond to the location of lipid phosphates at 20-22Å distances from the membrane center. Locations of Tyr atoms coincide with hydrophobic boundaries, while distributions maxima of Trp rings are shifted by 3-4Å toward the membrane center. Distributions of Trp atoms indicate the presence of two 5-8Å-wide midpolar regions with intermediate π* values within the hydrocarbon core, whose size and symmetry depend on the lipid composition of membrane leaflets. Midpolar regions are especially asymmetric in outer bacterial membranes and cell membranes of mesophilic but not hyperthermophilic archaebacteria, indicating the larger width of the central nonpolar region in the later case. In artificial lipid bilayers, midpolar regions are observed up to the level of acyl chain double bonds.
To gain insight into adaptations of proteins to their membranes, intrinsic hydrophobic thicknesses, distributions of different chemical groups and profn class="Chemical">iles of hydrogen-bonding capacities (α and β) and the dipolarity/polarizability parameter (π*) were calculated for lipid-facing surfaces of 460 integral α-helical, β-barrel and peripheral proteins from eight types of biomembranes. For comparison, polarity profiles were also calculated for ten artificial lipid bilayers that have been previously studied by neutron and X-ray scattering. Estimated hydrophobic thicknesses are 30-31Å for proteins from endoplasmic reticulum, thylakoid, and various bacterial plasma membranes, but differ for proteins from outer bacterial, inner mitochondrial and eukaryotic plasma membranes (23.9, 28.6 and 33.5Å, respectively). Protein and lipid polarity parameters abruptly change in the lipidcarbonyl zone that matches the calculated hydrophobic boundaries. Maxima of positively charged protein groups correspond to the location of lipid phosphates at 20-22Å distances from the membrane center. Locations of Tyr atoms coincide with hydrophobic boundaries, while distributions maxima of Trp rings are shifted by 3-4Å toward the membrane center. Distributions of Trp atoms indicate the presence of two 5-8Å-wide midpolar regions with intermediate π* values within the hydrocarbon core, whose size and symmetry depend on the lipid composition of membrane leaflets. Midpolar regions are especially asymmetric in outer bacterial membranes and cell membranes of mesophilic but not hyperthermophilic archaebacteria, indicating the larger width of the central nonpolar region in the later case. In artificial lipid bilayers, midpolar regions are observed up to the level of acyl chain double bonds.
Authors: Denis A Erilov; Rosa Bartucci; Rita Guzzi; Alexander A Shubin; Alexander G Maryasov; Derek Marsh; Sergei A Dzuba; Luigi Sportelli Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Michael Schlame; Jeffrey A Towbin; Paul M Heerdt; Roswitha Jehle; Salvatore DiMauro; Thomas J J Blanck Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Nicholas J Gleason; Denise V Greathouse; Christopher V Grant; Stanley J Opella; Roger E Koeppe Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Andrei L Lomize; Jacob M Hage; Kevin Schnitzer; Konstantin Golobokov; Mitchell B LaFaive; Alexander C Forsyth; Irina D Pogozheva Journal: J Chem Inf Model Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.956
Authors: Emilia L Wu; Patrick J Fleming; Min Sun Yeom; Göran Widmalm; Jeffery B Klauda; Karen G Fleming; Wonpil Im Journal: Biophys J Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Alexander L Boscia; Bradley W Treece; Dariush Mohammadyani; Judith Klein-Seetharaman; Anthony R Braun; Tsjerk A Wassenaar; Beate Klösgen; Stephanie Tristram-Nagle Journal: Chem Phys Lipids Date: 2013-12-28 Impact factor: 3.329