Literature DB >> 23811246

Association between body mass index and quality of split bowel preparation.

Nabil F Fayad1, Charles J Kahi, Khaled H Abd El-Jawad, Andrea S Shin, Shenil Shah, Kathleen A Lane, Thomas F Imperiale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the association between obesity and bowel preparation. We investigated whether body mass index (BMI) is an independent risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation in patients who receive split preparation regimens.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of data from 2163 consecutive patients (mean age, 60.6 ± 10.5 y; 93.8% male) who received outpatient colonoscopies in 2009 at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Indianapolis, Indiana. All patients received a split preparation, categorized as adequate (excellent or good, based on the Aronchick scale) or inadequate. We performed a multivariable analysis to identify factors independently associated with inadequate preparation.
RESULTS: Bowel preparation quality was inadequate for 44.2% of patients; these patients had significantly higher mean BMIs than patients with adequate preparation (31.2 ± 6.5 vs 29.8 ± 5.9, respectively; P < .0001) and Charlson comorbidity scores (1.5 ± 1.6 vs 1.1 ± 1.4; P < .0001). Independent risk factors for inadequate preparation were a BMI of 30 kg/m(2) or greater (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.75; P < .0001), use of tobacco (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54; P = .0084) or narcotics (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04-1.57; P = .0179), hypertension (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57; P = .0085), diabetes (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.12-1.69; P = .0021), and dementia (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.22-7.49; P = .0169).
CONCLUSIONS: BMI is an independent factor associated with inadequate split bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Additional factors associated with quality of bowel preparation include diabetes, hypertension, dementia, and use of tobacco and narcotics. Patients with BMIs of 30 kg/m(2) or greater should be considered for more intensive preparation regimens.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma Detection; BMI; CI; CPRS; Colonoscopy Preparation; Colorectal Cancer Screening; OR; Overweight; VAMC; Veterans Affairs Medical Center; body mass index; computerized patient record system; confidence interval; odds ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811246      PMCID: PMC3805775          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  26 in total

1.  A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Lorenzo Fuccio; Mario Bruno; Nico Pagano; Cristiano Spada; Silvia Carrara; Chiara Giordanino; Emanuele Rondonotti; Gabriele Curcio; Pietro Dulbecco; Carlo Fabbri; Domenico Della Casa; Stefania Maiero; Adriana Simone; Federico Iacopini; Giuseppe Feliciangeli; Gianpiero Manes; Antonio Rinaldi; Angelo Zullo; Francesca Rogai; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy.

Authors:  Douglas L Nguyen; Mark Wieland
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.008

Review 3.  Body mass index category as a risk factor for colorectal adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koji Okabayashi; Hutan Ashrafian; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Jae-Hoon Yoo; Vanash M Patel; Leanne Harling; Simon P Rowland; Mariam Ali; Yuko Kitagawa; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Fay Kastrinos; Michael Glick; Adam J Rosenbaum; Timothy Wang; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R Juluri; G Eckert; T F Imperiale
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Body mass index increases risk for colorectal adenomas based on meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiwen Ben; Wei An; Ying Jiang; Xianbao Zhan; Yiqi Du; Quan Cai Cai; Jie Gao; Zhaoshen Li
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Achieving quality in colonoscopy: bowel preparation timing and colon cleanliness.

Authors:  Prasad J Athreya; Gareth N Owen; Shing W Wong; Philip R Douglas; Graham L Newstead
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Todd W Kilgore; Abdillahi A Abdinoor; Nicholas M Szary; Samuel W Schowengerdt; Jamie B Yust; Abhishek Choudhary; Michelle L Matteson; Srinivas R Puli; John B Marshall; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study.

Authors:  Eun Hee Seo; Tae Oh Kim; Min Jae Park; Hee Rin Joo; Nae Yun Heo; Jongha Park; Seung Ha Park; Sung Yeon Yang; Young Soo Moon
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Timothy C Wang; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

2.  Optimal Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in the Elderly Patient.

Authors:  Samuel B Ho; Rita Hovsepians; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Phillip Gu; Daniel Lew; Sun Jung Oh; Aarshi Vipani; Jeffrey Ko; Kevin Hsu; Ebrahim Mirakhor; Varun Pattisapu; Tia Bullen; Garth Fuller; Brennan M R Spiegel; Christopher V Almario
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung In Seo; Jin Gu Kang; Hyoung Su Kim; Myoung Kuk Jang; Hak Yang Kim; Woon Geon Shin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Kang; Lina Zhao; Zhiyong Zhu; Felix Leung; Limei Wang; Xiangping Wang; Hui Luo; Linhui Zhang; Tao Dong; Pingying Li; Zhangqin Chen; Gui Ren; Hui Jia; Xiaoyang Guo; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Predictors of Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Using 3-l of Polyethylene Glycol for an Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Chi-Liang Cheng; Nai-Jen Liu; Jui-Hsiang Tang; Yen-Lin Kuo; Hsiang-Ling Hung; Yi-Ning Tsui; Bai-Ping Lee; Cheng-Hui Lin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Diabetics on Narcotics Are Less Likely to Achieve Excellent Bowel Preparation Than Are Patients with Either Condition.

Authors:  Mohammad F Madhoun; Hussein Bitar; Owais Bhatti; Hassaan Zia; Pratyusha Parava; Muhammad H Bashir
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality.

Authors:  Nikhil Kapila; Harjinder Singh; Kiranmayee Kandragunta; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Clinical stages of colorectal cancer diagnosed in obese and overweight individuals in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program.

Authors:  Piotr Spychalski; Jarek Kobiela; Paulina Wieszczy; Michał F Kamiński; Jarosław Reguła
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Association of obesity with colonic findings in screening colonoscopy in a large population-based study.

Authors:  Jarek Kobiela; Paulina Wieszczy; Jarosław Reguła; Michał F Kamiński
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.