Literature DB >> 23810335

Measurement of foot placement and its variability with inertial sensors.

John R Rebula1, Lauro V Ojeda, Peter G Adamczyk, Arthur D Kuo.   

Abstract

Gait parameters such as stride length, width, and period, as well as their respective variabilities, are widely used as indicators of mobility and walking function. Foot placement and its variability have thus been applied in areas such as aging, fall risk, spinal cord injury, diabetic neuropathy, and neurological conditions. But a drawback is that these measures are presently best obtained with specialized laboratory equipment such as motion capture systems and instrumented walkways, which may not be available in many clinics and certainly not during daily activities. One alternative is to fix inertial measurement units (IMUs) to the feet or body to gather motion data. However, few existing methods measure foot placement directly, due to drift associated with inertial data. We developed a method to measure stride-to-stride foot placement in unconstrained environments, and tested whether it can accurately quantify gait parameters over long walking distances. The method uses ground contact conditions to correct for drift, and state estimation algorithms to improve estimation of angular orientation. We tested the method with healthy adults walking over-ground, averaging 93 steps per trial, using a mobile motion capture system to provide reference data. We found IMU estimates of mean stride length and duration within 1% of motion capture, and standard deviations of length and width within 4% of motion capture. Step width cannot be directly estimated by IMUs, although lateral stride variability can. Inertial sensors measure walks over arbitrary distances, yielding estimates with good statistical confidence. Gait can thus be measured in a variety of environments, and even applied to long-term monitoring of everyday walking.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foot placement; Gait measurement; Inertial sensors; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810335      PMCID: PMC4284057          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  25 in total

1.  Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking.

Authors:  Wiebren Zijlstra; At L Hof
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion.

Authors:  Tammy M Owings; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  3D gait assessment in young and elderly subjects using foot-worn inertial sensors.

Authors:  Benoit Mariani; Constanze Hoskovec; Stephane Rochat; Christophe Büla; Julien Penders; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Foot placement variability as a walking balance mechanism post-spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kristin V Day; Steven A Kautz; Samuel S Wu; Sarah P Suter; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Pedestrian Tracking with shoe-mounted inertial sensors.

Authors:  Eric Foxlin
Journal:  IEEE Comput Graph Appl       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.088

6.  Gait pattern in inherited cerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Mariano Serrao; Francesco Pierelli; Alberto Ranavolo; Francesco Draicchio; Carmela Conte; Romildo Don; Roberto Di Fabio; Margherita LeRose; Luca Padua; Giorgio Sandrini; Carlo Casali
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters using inertial measurement units in neurological populations.

Authors:  Patrick Esser; Helen Dawes; Johnny Collett; Max G Feltham; Ken Howells
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Gait variability and disability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Michael J Socie; Robert W Motl; John H Pula; Brian M Sandroff; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  The instrumented timed up and go test: potential outcome measure for disease modifying therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Cris Zampieri; Arash Salarian; Patricia Carlson-Kuhta; Kamiar Aminian; John G Nutt; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed.

Authors:  Jennifer S Brach; Jaime E Berlin; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  40 in total

1.  Reconstruction of body motion during self-reported losses of balance in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Lauro V Ojeda; Peter G Adamczyk; John R Rebula; Linda V Nyquist; Debra M Strasburg; Neil B Alexander
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  The effect of shoe cushioning on gait and balance in females with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Andrew S Monaghan; Patrick G Monaghan; Sutton B Richmond; Jamie A Roper; Brett W Fling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The stabilizing properties of foot yaw in human walking.

Authors:  John R Rebula; Lauro V Ojeda; Peter G Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Objective falls-risk prediction using wearable technologies amongst patients with and without neurogenic gait alterations: a narrative review of clinical feasibility.

Authors:  Callum M W Betteridge; Pragadesh Natarajan; R Dineth Fonseka; Daniel Ho; Ralph Mobbs; Wen Jie Choy
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-10-20

5.  Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Tarun Kalyanaraman; Peter G Adamczyk; Edward S Claflin; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Influence of contextual task constraints on preferred stride parameters and their variabilities during human walking.

Authors:  Lauro V Ojeda; John R Rebula; Arthur D Kuo; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  A Novel Application of Eddy Current Braking for Functional Strength Training During Gait.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Edward S Claflin; R Brent Gillespie; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Objective biomarkers of balance and gait for Parkinson's disease using body-worn sensors.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; Martina Mancini
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 10.338

10.  Inertial Sensor-Based Step Length Estimation Model by Means of Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Melanija Vezočnik; Roman Kamnik; Matjaz B Juric
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.