Literature DB >> 23810309

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous drainage of breast fluid collections after mastectomy with expander-based breast reconstruction.

Ricky T Tong1, Maureen Kohi, Nicholas Fidelman, Yuo-Chen Kuo, Robert Foster, Anne Peled, K Pallav Kolli, Andrew G Taylor, Jeanne M LaBerge, Robert K Kerlan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine clinical outcomes of patients who underwent imaging-guided percutaneous drainage of breast fluid collections after mastectomy and breast reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous drainage of fluid collections after mastectomy with tissue expander-based reconstruction between January 2007 and September 2012. During this period, 879 mastectomies (563 patients) with expander-based breast reconstruction were performed. Fluid collections developed in 28 patients (5%), which led to 30 imaging-guided percutaneous drainage procedures. The median follow-up time was 533 days. Patient characteristics, surgical technique, microbiology analysis, and clinical outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 51.5 years (range, 30.9-69.4 y), and the median time between breast reconstruction and drainage was 35 days (range, 4-235 d). Erythema and swelling were the most common presenting symptoms. The median volume of fluid evacuated at the time of drain placement was 70 mL. Drains were left in place for a median 14 days (range, 6-34 d). Microorganisms were detected in the fluid in 12 of 30 drainage procedures, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common microorganism. No further intervention was needed in 21 of 30 drainage procedures (70%). However, surgical intervention (removal of expanders) was needed after 6 (20%) drainage procedures, and additional percutaneous drainage procedures were performed after 3 (10%) drainage procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage is an effective means of treating postoperative fluid collections after expander-based breast reconstruction and can obviate the need for repeat surgery in most cases.
Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810309      PMCID: PMC4393952          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  25 in total

Review 1.  The true incidence of near-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin I Newman; Kimberly A Swartz; Michel C Samson; Chris Brown Mahoney; Khaled Diab
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Technique for seroma drainage in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kurtis E Moyer; John D Potochny
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Maurizio B Nava; Angela E Pennati; Laura Lozza; Andrea Spano; Milvia Zambetti; Giuseppe Catanuto
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings.

Authors:  Sebastian Brooke; John Mesa; Mehmet Uluer; Brett Michelotti; Kurtis Moyer; Rogerio I Neves; Donald Mackay; John Potochny
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.

Authors:  Raffi Gurunluoglu; Aslin Gurunluoglu; Susan A Williams; Seth Tebockhorst
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications.

Authors:  Anuja K Antony; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Esther H Teo; Alexander F Arriaga; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S L Spear; P M Parikh; E Reisin; N G Menon
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Randomized clinical trial investigating the use of drains and fibrin sealant following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  P K Jain; R Sowdi; A D G Anderson; J MacFie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Factors predicting seroma formation after mastectomy for Chinese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Wings Ty Loo; Louis Wc Chow
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.224

10.  Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades.

Authors:  Vivek Srivastava; Somprakas Basu; Vijay Kumar Shukla
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

View more
  3 in total

1.  Simple-safe-sure Fluid Drainage Just above Breast Tissue Expander using 18-Gauge Blunt Cannula.

Authors:  Yu Kagaya; Masaki Arikawa; Daisuke Kageyama; Takuya Sekiyama; Satoshi Akazawa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-10-16

2.  Microbiology of breast tissue expanders.

Authors:  Maja Molska; Mateusz Wichtowski; Dawid Murawa
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  Perioperative Risk Factors for Prolonged Blood Loss and Drainage Fluid Secretion after Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Tonatiuh Flores; Florian J Jaklin; Alexander Rohrbacher; Klaus F Schrögendorfer; Konstantin D Bergmeister
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.