Literature DB >> 21184070

The true incidence of near-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: a meta-analysis.

Martin I Newman1, Kimberly A Swartz, Michel C Samson, Chris Brown Mahoney, Khaled Diab.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of human acellular dermal matrix (HADM) materials in prosthetic-based breast reconstruction has gained popularity in recent years. Questions remain, however, regarding the nature and incidence of postoperative complications associated with this technique. The results reported in the available literature vary widely. This meta-analysis examines this question further with a broad review of the available literature in an effort to better define the true nature and incidence of near-term complications associated with the use of HADM in prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. It does not aim to compare this method of reconstruction to others.
METHODS: A review of the available literature was performed in July 2009. The goal was to identify all previous works describing the placement of HADM at prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. Included were studies that documented the use of HADM for coverage of tissue expanders or permanent implants following therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy. Excluded were studies that reported on the use of HADM in cosmetic breast surgery or studies that included the use of xenografts. Data collected included demographics as well as the nature and incidence of complications, with separate categories assigned for seroma, infection, flap necrosis, and "other." Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis(®) software (Biostat, Englewood, NJ). Raw proportions, fixed-effect models, and random-effect models were used to assess the complication rates across studies.
RESULTS: Eleven published articles and one abstract that was later published as an article were identified. Within these 12 studies, a total of 789 breasts were identified that had undergone reconstruction with HADM. The mean follow-up was 13.7 months. Under the random-effects model, the total complication rate was 12.0%. The most common complications were flap necrosis (3.3%), seroma (3.3%), and infection (5.6%). All complications not included in these categories were set apart in a separate category, "Other," and totaled 3.0%
CONCLUSION: The true incidence of postoperative complications in the near term utilizing HADM in prosthetic-based breast reconstruction appears to be approximately 12%. The incidence of long-term complications such as capsular contracture remains unknown. However, as surgical experience with HADM grows, operative techniques designed at reducing risks will mature, strategies for managing complications will advance, and more advanced products designed to reduce the incidence of complications are likely to become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21184070     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-010-9631-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  20 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of percutaneous drainage of breast fluid collections after mastectomy with expander-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ricky T Tong; Maureen Kohi; Nicholas Fidelman; Yuo-Chen Kuo; Robert Foster; Anne Peled; K Pallav Kolli; Andrew G Taylor; Jeanne M LaBerge; Robert K Kerlan
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  A New Approach to Minimize Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Prosthesis-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ivan Hadad; Allen S Liu; Lifei Guo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10

3.  TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series.

Authors:  Donato Casella; Marco Bernini; Lapo Bencini; Jenny Roselli; Maria Teresa Lacaria; Jacopo Martellucci; Roberto Banfi; Claudio Calabrese; Lorenzo Orzalesi
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08-03

4.  A systematic review of infection rates and associated antibiotic duration in acellular dermal matrix breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Brett T Phillips; Muath Bishawi; Alexander B Dagum; Duc T Bui; Sami U Khan
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-11-11

Review 5.  Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Hugh Logan Ellis; Oluwatosin Asaolu; Vivien Nebo; Abdul Kasem
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marco Bernini; Claudio Calabrese; Lorenzo Cecconi; Caterina Santi; Ulpjana Gjondedaj; Jenny Roselli; Jacopo Nori; Alfonso Fausto; Lorenzo Orzalesi; Donato Casella
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-01-07

7.  A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Orion P Keifer; Eugenia K Page; Alexandra Hart; Randall Rudderman; Grant W Carlson; Albert Losken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-13

8.  Three types of dermal grafts in rats: the importance of mechanical property and structural design.

Authors:  Chuangang You; Xingang Wang; Yurong Zheng; Chunmao Han
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 9.  Protocol for the prevention and management of complications related to ADM implant-based breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Isabelle Citron; Rory Dower; Mark Ho-Asjoe
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-01-21

10.  Comparison of 30-day Clinical Outcomes with SimpliDerm and AlloDerm RTU in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Tierney
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.