Literature DB >> 23810299

Predictors of percutaneous access failure requiring open femoral surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Albeir Y Mousa1, John E Campbell, Mike Broce, Shadi Abu-Halimah, Patrick A Stone, Stephen M Hass, Ali F AbuRahma, Mark Bates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of percutaneous (PEVAR) access failure requiring conversion to an open approach (OEVAR) during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).
METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of all EVAR patients from January 2009 through June 2011 with multivariate analysis of clinical and anatomic variables that could impact access outcome was conducted. Target vessel calcification was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe based on circumferential calcium arc (<⅓, ⅓ to ½, and >½ respectively), dyslipidemia (defined as low-density lipoprotein >130 mg/dL or receiving lipid lowering medication), and obesity (defined as body mass index [BMI] >30).
RESULTS: We investigated 400 access sites for 200 patients who underwent EVAR. The study cohort's characteristics included an average age of 72.8 ± 9.0 years, vessel size of 9.6 ± 1.8 mm, sheath size of 17.1 ± 3.0 Fr, BMI of 27.6 ± 5.3, and estimated glomular filtration rate of 68.5 ± 24.2 mL/min. Comorbidities included dyslipidemia in 129 patients (64.5%) and diabetes in 54 patients (27%). There were 132 OEVAR (66 patients), two mixed OEVAR with contralateral PEVAR (one patient), and 266 (133 patients) PEVAR approaches. Use of PEVAR increased over time (45.5% [2009], 77.8% [2010], and up to 88.5% [2011]; P = .001) while conversions decreased (24.3% [2009], 8.7% [2010], and 4.3% [2011]; P = .001]. More OEVAR patients (35.8%) stayed longer than 3 days compared with 21.1% for PEVAR (P = .028). For the 266 PEVAR approaches, 32 access sites (12.0%) had to be converted. Severely calcified arteries were most predictive of conversion (odds ratio [OR], 36.4; P < .001). Year of procedure (2010; OR, 0.17; P = .001; 2011, OR, 0.20; P = .049), female gender (OR, 3.1; P = .017), moderately calcified arteries (OR, 2.5; P = .085), and age (OR, 2.3 [per decade]; P = .002) were all also significant. Vessel size, sheath size, and BMI were found to be nonsignificant predictors of conversion.
CONCLUSIONS: PEVAR was found to be safe, reliable, and feasible. Several factors, including learning curve, vessel calcification, age, and female gender predicted conversion of PEVAR to OEVAR.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810299     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  16 in total

1.  Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  Martijn van Dorp; Martijn Gilbers; Patrick Lauwers; Paul E Van Schil; Jeroen M H Hendriks
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-06-01

2.  Percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair is not contraindicated in obese patients.

Authors:  Jason Zakko; Salvatore Scali; Adam W Beck; Charles T Klodell; Thomas M Beaver; Tomas D Martin; Thomas S Huber; Robert J Feezor
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Eleonora G Karthaus; Peter A Soden; Klaas H J Ultee; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Preoperative risk score for access site failure in ultrasound-guided percutaneous aortic procedures.

Authors:  Patric Liang; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Chun Li; Andy Lee; Mark C Wyers; Allen D Hamdan; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Vascular Complications Associated with Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  George L Hines; Vita Jaspan; Brian J Kelly; Rose Calixte
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-09-07

6.  Comparison of percutaneous and cutdown access‑related minor complications after endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Artur Rebelo; Patrick Voss; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Carsten Sekulla; Jörg Ukkat
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 7.  Current Status of Percutaneous Endografting.

Authors:  Parag J Patel; Quinton Kelly; Robert A Hieb; Cheong Jun Lee
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Femoral Artery Closure Versus Surgical Cutdown for Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Jianlin Liu; Yanzi Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-01-05

9.  Totally Percutaneous Access Using Perclose Proglide for Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Diseases.

Authors:  Eduardo Keller Saadi; Marina Saadi; Rodrigo Saadi; Ana Paula Tagliari; Bernardo Mastella
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

10.  24h and 30 day outcome of Perclose Proglide suture mediated vascular closure device: An Indian experience.

Authors:  Desabandhu Vinayakumar; Shajudeen Kayakkal; Sandeep Rajasekharan; Julian Johny Thottian; Prasanth Sankaran; Cicy Bastian
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.