Stacey J Winham1, Joanna M Biernacka. 1. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complex psychiatric traits have long been thought to be the result of a combination of genetic and environmental factors, and gene-environment interactions are thought to play a crucial role in behavioral phenotypes and the susceptibility and progression of psychiatric disorders. Candidate gene studies to investigate hypothesized gene-environment interactions are now fairly common in human genetic research, and with the shift toward genome-wide association studies, genome-wide gene-environment interaction studies are beginning to emerge. METHODS: We summarize the basic ideas behind gene-environment interaction, and provide an overview of possible study designs and traditional analysis methods in the context of genome-wide analysis. We then discuss novel approaches beyond the traditional strategy of analyzing the interaction between the environmental factor and each polymorphism individually. RESULTS: Two-step filtering approaches that reduce the number of polymorphisms tested for interactions can substantially increase the power of genome-wide gene-environment studies. New analytical methods including data-mining approaches, and gene-level and pathway-level analyses, also have the capacity to improve our understanding of how complex genetic and environmental factors interact to influence psychologic and psychiatric traits. Such methods, however, have not yet been utilized much in behavioral and mental health research. CONCLUSIONS: Although methods to investigate gene-environment interactions are available, there is a need for further development and extension of these methods to identify gene-environment interactions in the context of genome-wide association studies. These novel approaches need to be applied in studies of psychology and psychiatry.
BACKGROUND: Complex psychiatric traits have long been thought to be the result of a combination of genetic and environmental factors, and gene-environment interactions are thought to play a crucial role in behavioral phenotypes and the susceptibility and progression of psychiatric disorders. Candidate gene studies to investigate hypothesized gene-environment interactions are now fairly common in human genetic research, and with the shift toward genome-wide association studies, genome-wide gene-environment interaction studies are beginning to emerge. METHODS: We summarize the basic ideas behind gene-environment interaction, and provide an overview of possible study designs and traditional analysis methods in the context of genome-wide analysis. We then discuss novel approaches beyond the traditional strategy of analyzing the interaction between the environmental factor and each polymorphism individually. RESULTS: Two-step filtering approaches that reduce the number of polymorphisms tested for interactions can substantially increase the power of genome-wide gene-environment studies. New analytical methods including data-mining approaches, and gene-level and pathway-level analyses, also have the capacity to improve our understanding of how complex genetic and environmental factors interact to influence psychologic and psychiatric traits. Such methods, however, have not yet been utilized much in behavioral and mental health research. CONCLUSIONS: Although methods to investigate gene-environment interactions are available, there is a need for further development and extension of these methods to identify gene-environment interactions in the context of genome-wide association studies. These novel approaches need to be applied in studies of psychology and psychiatry.
Authors: Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Jessica Lasky-Su; Benjamin M Neale; Robert Oades; Wai Chen; Barbara Franke; Jan Buitelaar; Tobias Banaschewski; Richard Ebstein; Michael Gill; Richard Anney; Ana Miranda; Fernando Mulas; Herbert Roeyers; Aribert Rothenberger; Joseph Sergeant; Hans Christoph Steinhausen; Margaret Thompson; Philip Asherson; Stephen V Faraone Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Johannes Hebebrand; Andre Scherag; Benno G Schimmelmann; Anke Hinney Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Susan E Young; Andrew Smolen; John K Hewitt; Brett C Haberstick; Michael C Stallings; Robin P Corley; Thomas J Crowley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Helen L Fisher; Sarah Cohen-Woods; Georgina M Hosang; Ania Korszun; Mike Owen; Nick Craddock; Ian W Craig; Anne E Farmer; Peter McGuffin; Rudolf Uher Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Christian Kieling; Mara H Hutz; Júlia P Genro; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Luciana Anselmi; Suzi Camey; Pedro C Hallal; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora; Ana M B Menezes; Luis Augusto Rohde Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Liang He; Ilya Zhbannikov; Konstantin G Arbeev; Anatoliy I Yashin; Alexander M Kulminski Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Erin C Dunn; Ruth C Brown; Yael Dai; Jonathan Rosand; Nicole R Nugent; Ananda B Amstadter; Jordan W Smoller Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Joanna M Biernacka; Sun Ju Chung; Sebastian M Armasu; Kari S Anderson; Christina M Lill; Lars Bertram; J E Ahlskog; Laura Brighina; Roberta Frigerio; Demetrius M Maraganore Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 4.891