Literature DB >> 23807805

MAGNAMOSIS IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

J Wall1, M Diana, J Leroy, V Deruijter, K D Gonzales, V Lindner, M Harrison, J Marescaux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: MAGNAMOSIS forms a compression anastomosis using self-assembling magnetic rings that can be delivered via flexible endoscopy. The system has proven to be effective in full-thickness porcine small-bowel anastomoses. The aim of this study was to show the feasibility of the MAGNAMOSIS system in hybrid endoscopic colorectal surgery and to compare magnetic and conventional stapled anastomoses.
METHODS: A total of 16 swine weighing 35 - 50 kg were used following animal ethical committee approval. The first animal was an acute model to establish the feasibility of the procedure. The subsequent 15 animals were survival models, 10 of which underwent side-to-side anastomoses (SSA) and 5 of which underwent end-to-side (ESA) procedures. Time to patency, surveillance endoscopy, burst pressure, compression force, and histology were assessed. Histology was compared with conventional stapled anastomoses. Magnetic compression forces were measured in various anastomosis configurations.
RESULTS: Colorectal anastomoses were performed in all cases using a hybrid NOTES technique. The mean operating time was 71 minutes. Mean time to completion of the anastomosis was similar between the SSA and ESA groups. Burst pressure at 10 days was greater than 95 mmHg in both groups. One complication occurred in the ESA group. Compression force among various configurations of the magnetic rings was significantly different (P < 0.05). Inflammation and fibrosis were similar between magnetic SSA and conventional stapled anastomoses.
CONCLUSION: MAGNAMOSIS was feasible in performing a hybrid NOTES colorectal anastomosis. It has the advantage over circular staplers of precise endoscopic delivery throughout the entire colon. SSA was reliable and effective. A minimum initial compression force of 4 N appears to be required for reliable magnetic anastomoses. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807805     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  10 in total

1.  Utilisation of magnets to enhance gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Imdadur Rahman; Praful Patel; Philip Boger; Mike Thomson; Nadeem Ahmad Afzal
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-25

Review 2.  Innovations in minimally invasive surgery: lessons learned from translational animal models.

Authors:  D Mutter; B Dallemagne; S Perretta; M Vix; J Leroy; P Pessaux; J Marescaux
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors (with video).

Authors:  Ippei Matsuzaki; Masashi Hattori; Hiroki Yamauchi; Naoya Goto; Yuji Iwata; Takio Yokoi; Mafu Tsunemi; Makoto Kobayashi; Takeshi Yamamura; Ryoji Miyahara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A modular magnetic anastomotic device for minimally invasive digestive anastomosis: proof of concept and preliminary data in the pig model.

Authors:  Michele Diana; Didier Mutter; Véronique Lindner; Michel Vix; Hyunsoo Chung; Nicolas Demartines; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Rapid prototyped sutureless anastomosis device from self-curing silk bio-ink.

Authors:  Rod R Jose; Waseem K Raja; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Pieter G L Koolen; Kuylhee Kim; Abdurrahman Abdurrob; Jonathan A Kluge; Samuel J Lin; Gillian Beamer; David L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets.

Authors:  Marvin Ryou; Hiroyuki Aihara; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Inventing the future of surgery.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Electromagnetic tool for the endoscopic creation of colon anastomoses-development and feasibility assessment of a novel anastomosis compression implant approach.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Anne Zimmermann; Thomas Wittenberg; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  A Rat Model of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Using a Novel Magnetic Anastomosis Technique for Suprahepatic Vena Cava Reconstruction.

Authors:  Lifei Yang; Jianwen Lu; Yue Wang; Mei Zhang; Yuan Shi; Shasha Wei; Peng Liu; Zheng Wu; Yi Lv; Rongqian Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.355

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.