UNLABELLED: Background Despite the availability of testing and treatment, bacterial sexually transmissible infections (STIs) continue to occur at endemic levels in many remote Indigenous communities in Australia. New generation molecular point-of-care (POC) tests have high sensitivity, comparable with conventional diagnostic tests, and have the potential to increase the impact of STI screening. METHODS: We developed mathematical models of gonorrhoea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae) and chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) transmission in remote Indigenous communities in Australia to evaluate screening and treatment strategies that utilise POC tests. RESULTS: The introduction of POC testing with 95% sensitivity could reduce the prevalence of gonorrhoea and chlamydia from 7.1% and 11.9% to 5.7% and 8.9%, respectively, under baseline screening coverage of 44% per year. If screening coverage is increased to 60% per year, prevalence is predicted to be reduced to 3.6% and 6.7%, respectively, under conventional testing, and further reduced to 1.8% and 3.1% with the introduction of POC testing. Increasing screening coverage to 80% per year will result in a reduction in the prevalence of gonorrhoea and chlamydia to 0.6% and 1.5%, respectively, and the virtual elimination of both STIs if POC testing is introduced. CONCLUSIONS: Modelling suggests that molecular POC tests of high sensitivity have great promise as a public health strategy for controlling chlamydia and gonorrhoea. However, evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of POC testing needs to be made before widespread implementation of this technology can be considered.
UNLABELLED: Background Despite the availability of testing and treatment, bacterial sexually transmissible infections (STIs) continue to occur at endemic levels in many remote Indigenous communities in Australia. New generation molecular point-of-care (POC) tests have high sensitivity, comparable with conventional diagnostic tests, and have the potential to increase the impact of STI screening. METHODS: We developed mathematical models of gonorrhoea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae) and chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) transmission in remote Indigenous communities in Australia to evaluate screening and treatment strategies that utilise POC tests. RESULTS: The introduction of POC testing with 95% sensitivity could reduce the prevalence of gonorrhoea and chlamydia from 7.1% and 11.9% to 5.7% and 8.9%, respectively, under baseline screening coverage of 44% per year. If screening coverage is increased to 60% per year, prevalence is predicted to be reduced to 3.6% and 6.7%, respectively, under conventional testing, and further reduced to 1.8% and 3.1% with the introduction of POC testing. Increasing screening coverage to 80% per year will result in a reduction in the prevalence of gonorrhoea and chlamydia to 0.6% and 1.5%, respectively, and the virtual elimination of both STIs if POC testing is introduced. CONCLUSIONS: Modelling suggests that molecular POC tests of high sensitivity have great promise as a public health strategy for controlling chlamydia and gonorrhoea. However, evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of POC testing needs to be made before widespread implementation of this technology can be considered.
Authors: Anne M Rompalo; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Terry Hogan; Mathilda Barnes; Mary Jett-Goheen; Jill S Huppert; Charlotte A Gaydos Journal: Sex Health Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Simon Graham; Rebecca J Guy; James S Ward; John Kaldor; Basil Donovan; Janet Knox; Debbie McCowen; Patricia Bullen; Julie Booker; Chris O'Brien; Kristine Garrett; Handan C Wand Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: L Natoli; R J Guy; M Shephard; D Whiley; S N Tabrizi; J Ward; D G Regan; S G Badman; D A Anderson; J Kaldor; L Maher Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rebecca J Guy; Lisa Natoli; James Ward; Louise Causer; Belinda Hengel; David Whiley; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Basil Donovan; Christopher K Fairley; Steven B Badman; Annie Tangey; Handan Wand; Mark Shephard; David G Regan; David Wilson; David Anderson; John M Kaldor Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Gary G Whitlock; Daniel C Gibbons; Nick Longford; Michael J Harvey; Alan McOwan; Elisabeth J Adams Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: D J Shin; P Athamanolap; L Chen; J Hardick; M Lewis; Y H Hsieh; R E Rothman; C A Gaydos; T H Wang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 4.996