Literature DB >> 23803012

Accuracy of dialysis medical records in determining patients' interest in and suitability for transplantation.

Anne M Huml1, Catherine M Sullivan, Julie A Pencak, Ashwini R Sehgal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the accuracy of dialysis medical records in identifying patients' interest in and suitability for transplantation. STUDY
DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 167 patients recruited from 23 hemodialysis facilities. INTERVENTION: Navigators met with intervention patients to provide transplant information and assistance. Control patients continued to receive usual care. OUTCOMES: Agreement at study initiation between medical records and (i) patient self-reported interest in transplantation and (ii) study assessments of medical suitability for transplant referral. MEASUREMENTS: Medical record assessments, self-reports, and study assessments of patient's interest in and suitability for transplantation.
RESULTS: There was disagreement between medical records and patient self-reported interest in transplantation for 66 (40%) of the 167 study patients. In most of these cases, patients reported being more interested in transplantation than their medical records indicated. The study team determined that all 92 intervention patients were medically suitable for transplant referral. However, for 38 (41%) intervention patients, medical records indicated that they were not suitable. About two-thirds of these patients successfully moved forward in the transplant process.
CONCLUSION: Dialysis medical records are frequently inaccurate in determining patient's interest in and suitability for transplantation.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; dialysis; medical records; transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23803012      PMCID: PMC3740010          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  12 in total

1.  The effect of patients' preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes: a paired donor kidney analysis.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  A systematic review of barriers in access to renal transplantation among African Americans in the United States.

Authors:  Sankar D Navaneethan; Sonal Singh
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Barriers to evaluation and wait listing for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Jon A Gregg; Jeffrey S Harman; Allyson G Hall; Pamela R Patton; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Drug record discrepancies in an outpatient electronic medical record: frequency, type, and potential impact on patient care at a hemodialysis center.

Authors:  Harold J Manley; Debra K Drayer; Marcy McClaran; Walter Bender; Richard S Muther
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.705

6.  An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care.

Authors:  Timothy R Dresselhaus; John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Dan Bertenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Framing disparities along the continuum of care from chronic kidney disease to transplantation: barriers and interventions.

Authors:  K Ladin; J R Rodrigue; D W Hanto
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor.

Authors:  G C Alexander; A R Sehgal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits.

Authors:  K C Stange; S J Zyzanski; T F Smith; R Kelly; D M Langa; S A Flocke; C R Jaén
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Impact of navigators on completion of steps in the kidney transplant process: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine Sullivan; Janeen B Leon; Srilekha S Sayre; Marquisha Marbury; Michael Ivers; Julie A Pencak; Kenneth A Bodziak; Donald E Hricik; E Janie Morrison; Jeffrey M Albert; Sankar D Navaneethan; Christina M Delos Reyes; Ashwini R Sehgal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 8.237

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.

Authors:  Alvin H Li; Marcus Lo; Jacob E Crawshaw; Alexie J Dunnett; Kyla L Naylor; Amit X Garg; Justin Presseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-04

2.  Helping More Patients Receive a Living Donor Kidney Transplant.

Authors:  Amit X Garg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Reporting of key methodological and ethical aspects of cluster trials in hemodialysis require improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed A Al-Jaishi; Kelly Carroll; Cory E Goldstein; Stephanie N Dixon; Amit X Garg; Stuart G Nicholls; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Charles Weijer; Jamie Brehaut; Lehana Thabane; P J Devereaux; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.