| Literature DB >> 23802862 |
Sabrina Mesquita-Rocha, Patricio C Godoy-Martinez, Sarah S Gonçalves, Milton Daniel Urrutia, Fabianne Carlesse, Adriana Seber, Maria Aparecida Aguiar Silva, Antônio Sérgio Petrilli, Arnaldo L Colombo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective study to investigate the presence of microfungal contamination in the water supply system of the Oncology Paediatric Institute, São Paulo-Brazil after the occurrence of one invasive Fusarium solani infection in a patient after Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). During a twelve-month period, we investigated the water supply system of the HSCT unit by monitoring a total of fourteen different collection sites.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23802862 PMCID: PMC3708769 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Water distribution system facilities that were sampled during the environmental surveillance study of pathogenic fungi. This figure illustrates all collection sites: easel, tanks (TI -T4), sink taps from 4 hospital rooms (B1-B4 represent suites) located on the same floor and a nurses station.
Distribution of fungal isolates obtained from the water supply system of a paediatric haematopoietic stem cell unit during a 12-month period
| | 3 (27.4) | 4 | 1.3 (1–2) | |
| Point where the municipal water supply enters the hospital: | 2 (18.2) | 10 | 5 (5–5) | |
| 11 samples collected | 2 (18.2) | 6 | 3 (2–4) | |
| | 1 (9.1) | 1 | 1 (1–1) | |
| | 1 (9.1) | 15 | 15 (15–15) | |
| | | Subtotal | 36 | |
| | 33 (70.2) | 398 | 12.1 (1–55) | |
| | 28 (59.7) | 262 | 9.4 (2–20) | |
| | 23 (48.9) | 192 | 8.3(1–25) | |
| Tanks: | 10 (21.3) | 55 | 5.5 (1–20) | |
| 47 samples collected | 6 (12.8) | 38 | 6.3(1–15) | |
| | 5 (10.6) | 28 | 5.6 (2–15) | |
| | 2 (4.3) | 40 | 20 (20–20) | |
| | 2 (4.3) | 20 | 10 (10–10) | |
| | 2 (4.3) | 13 | 6.5 (3–10) | |
| | 2 (4.3) | 21 | 10.5 (1–20) | |
| | 2 (4.3) | 55 | 27.5 (5–50) | |
| | 1 (2.1) | 25 | 25 (25–25) | |
| | 1 (2.1) | 1 | 1 (1–1) | |
| | 1 (2.1) | 20 | 20 (20–20) | |
| | 1 (2.1) | 5 | 5 (5–5) | |
| | | Subtotal | 1173 | |
| | 23 (21.7) | 563 | 24.5 (2–60) | |
| | 15 (14.2) | 148 | 9.9 (2–28) | |
| | 14 (13.2) | 216 | 15.4 (2–80) | |
| | 14 (13.2) | 94 | 6.7 (2–24) | |
| | 9 (8.5) | 60 | 6.7 (2–24) | |
| Tap water from high-risk unit (HSCT): | 6 (5.7) | 18 | 3 (2–8) | |
| 106 samples collected | 2 (1.9) | 44 | 22 (4–40) | |
| | 1 (0.9) | 4 | 4 (4–4) | |
| | 1 (0.9) | 2 | 2 (2–2) | |
| | 1 (0.9) | 4 | 4 (4–4) | |
| | | Subtotal | 1153 | |
*Total number of CFUs obtained in all positive samples.
Figure 2Distribution of fungal propagules in water samples collected from 4 different seasons of the year.
Figure 3a-d. Correlation between microbial counts and four different the physicochemical parameters of water samples documented during a 12-month period of study.