Literature DB >> 23802670

Comparative assessment of left ventricular function variables determined via cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in dogs.

Anne K Sieslack1, Peter Dziallas, Ingo Nolte, Patrick Wefstaedt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) volumetric and function variables determined via contrast-enhanced cardiac CT and cardiac MRI in healthy dogs. ANIMALS: 10 healthy Beagles. PROCEDURES: Cardiac MRI and cardiac CT were performed in anesthetized Beagles; both examinations were conducted within a 2-hour period. Cardiac MRI was performed with a 3.0-T magnet, and contrast-enhanced cardiac CT was performed with a 64-row detector CT machine. Data sets were acquired during apnea with simultaneous ECG gating. Short-axis images were created to determine functional variables via the Simpson method.
RESULTS: Cardiac CT values for mean end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes had excellent correlation (r = 0.95) with cardiac MRI measurements, whereas LV stroke volume (r = 0.67) and LV ejection fraction (r = 0.75) had good correlations. The only variable that differed significantly between imaging modalities was end-diastolic LV volume. For each pair of values, Bland-Altman analysis revealed good limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The 3-D modalities cardiac CT and cardiac MRI were excellent techniques for use in assessing LV functional variables. Similar results were obtained for LV volume and function variables via both techniques. The major disadvantage of these modalities was the need to anesthetize the dogs for the examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23802670     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.74.7.990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  4 in total

1.  Computed tomography of dynamic changes of the aortic root during systole and diastole in patients with coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  Xiaohan Hu; Claudia Frellesen; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Martin Beeres; Boris Bodelle; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Effects of two different anesthetic protocols on 64-MDCT coronary angiography in dogs.

Authors:  Randi Drees; Rebecca A Johnson; Marie Pinkerton; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Jimmy H Saunders; Christopher J François
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 1.363

3.  Effects of two different anesthetic protocols on cardiac flow measured by two dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Randi Drees; Rebecca A Johnson; Rebecca L Stepien; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Christopher J François
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 1.363

4.  QUANTITATIVE PLANAR AND VOLUMETRIC CARDIAC MEASUREMENTS USING 64 MDCT AND 3T MRI VS. STANDARD 2D AND M-MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: DOES ANESTHETIC PROTOCOL MATTER?

Authors:  Randi Drees; Rebecca A Johnson; Rebecca L Stepien; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Jimmy H Saunders; Christopher J François
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 1.363

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.