Literature DB >> 23802548

Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core.

Archana Purushotham1, Bruce C V Campbell, Matus Straka, Michael Mlynash, Jean-Marc Olivot, Roland Bammer, Stephanie M Kemp, Gregory W Albers, Maarten G Lansberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MRI-based selection of patients for acute stroke interventions requires rapid accurate estimation of the infarct core on diffusion-weighted MRI. Typically used manual methods to delineate restricted diffusion lesions are subjective and time consuming. These limitations would be overcome by a fully automated method that can rapidly and objectively delineate the ischemic core. An automated method would require predefined criteria to identify the ischemic core. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine apparent diffusion coefficient-based criteria that can be implemented in a fully automated software solution for identification of the ischemic core.
METHODS: Imaging data from patients enrolled in the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) study who had early revascularization following intravenous thrombolysis were included. The patients' baseline restricted diffusion and 30-day T2 -weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery lesions were manually delineated after coregistration. Parts of the restricted diffusion lesion that corresponded with 30-day infarct were considered ischemic core, whereas parts that corresponded with normal brain parenchyma at 30 days were considered noncore. The optimal apparent diffusion coefficient threshold to discriminate core from noncore voxels was determined by voxel-based receiver operating characteristics analysis using the Youden index.
RESULTS: 51,045 diffusion positive voxels from 14 patients who met eligibility criteria were analyzed. The mean DWI lesion volume was 24 (± 23) ml. Of this, 18 (± 22) ml was ischemic core and 3 (± 5) ml was noncore. The remainder corresponded to preexisting gliosis, cerebrospinal fluid, or was lost to postinfarct atrophy. The apparent diffusion coefficient of core was lower than that of noncore voxels (P < 0.0001). The optimal threshold for identification of ischemic core was an apparent diffusion coefficient ≤ 620 × 10(-6) mm(2) /s (sensitivity 69% and specificity 78%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the ischemic core can be identified with an absolute apparent diffusion coefficient threshold. This threshold can be implemented in image analysis software for fully automated segmentation of the ischemic core.
© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2013 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent diffusion coefficient; diffusion MRI; diffusion-perfusion imaging; ischemic core; ischemic stroke; neuroimaging of acute stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23802548      PMCID: PMC3786020          DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  22 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study.

Authors:  Gregory W Albers; Vincent N Thijs; Lawrence Wechsler; Stephanie Kemp; Gottfried Schlaug; Elaine Skalabrin; Roland Bammer; Wataru Kakuda; Maarten G Lansberg; Ashfaq Shuaib; William Coplin; Scott Hamilton; Michael Moseley; Michael P Marks
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Does reversal of ischemia on diffusion-weighted imaging reflect higher apparent diffusion coefficient values?

Authors:  H L Lutsep; G M Nesbit; R M Berger; W R Coshow
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient thresholds do not predict the response to acute stroke thrombolysis.

Authors:  Poh-Sien Loh; Ken S Butcher; Mark W Parsons; Lachlan MacGregor; Patricia M Desmond; Brian M Tress; Stephen M Davis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Evolution of regional changes in apparent diffusion coefficient during focal ischemia of rat brain: the relationship of quantitative diffusion NMR imaging to reduction in cerebral blood flow and metabolic disturbances.

Authors:  M Hoehn-Berlage; D G Norris; K Kohno; G Mies; D Leibfritz; K A Hossmann
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Evaluation of the clinical-diffusion and perfusion-diffusion mismatch models in DEFUSE.

Authors:  Maarten G Lansberg; Vincent N Thijs; Scott Hamilton; Gottfried Schlaug; Roland Bammer; Stephanie Kemp; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Late secondary ischemic injury in patients receiving intraarterial thrombolysis.

Authors:  Chelsea S Kidwell; Jeffrey L Saver; Sidney Starkman; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; Paul Vespa; J Pablo Villablanca; David S Liebeskind; Y Pierre Gobin; Fernando Vinuela; Jeffry R Alger
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  MRI diffusion mapping of reversible and irreversible ischemic injury in focal brain ischemia.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; M Fisher; L L Latour; B J Dardzinski; C H Sotak
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute ischemia: value of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity thresholds in predicting tissue at risk and final infarct size.

Authors:  Dong Gyu Na; Vincent N Thijs; Gregory W Albers; Michael E Moseley; Michael P Marks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Risk factors of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after tPA therapy for acute stroke.

Authors:  Maarten G Lansberg; Vincent N Thijs; Roland Bammer; Stephanie Kemp; Christine A C Wijman; Michael P Marks; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Characterizing the diffusion/perfusion mismatch in experimental focal cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Xiangjun Meng; Marc Fisher; Qiang Shen; Christopher H Sotak; Timothy Q Duong
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  53 in total

1.  Rapid Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Evolution After Early Revascularization.

Authors:  Amie W Hsia; Marie Luby; Kaylie Cullison; Shannon Burton; Rocco Armonda; Ai-Hsi Liu; Richard Leigh; Zurab Nadareishvili; Richard T Benson; John K Lynch; Lawrence L Latour
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Infarct location is associated with quality of life after mild ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Chen Lin; Rajbeer Sangha; Jungwha Lee; Carlos Corado; Anvesh Jalasutram; Neil Chatterjee; Carson Ingo; Timothy Carroll; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.266

3.  Predictive value of the combination of lesion location and volume of ischemic infarction with rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Chen Lin; Neil Chatterjee; Jungwha Lee; Richard Harvey; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Impact of perfusion lesion in corticospinal tract on response to reperfusion.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Ruiting Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Shenqiang Yan; Ze Wang; Bruce C V Campbell; David S Liebeskind; Min Lou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Association between the perfusion/diffusion and diffusion/FLAIR mismatch: data from the AXIS2 trial.

Authors:  Anke Wouters; Patrick Dupont; Erich B Ringelstein; Bo Norrving; Angel Chamorro; Martin Grond; Rico Laage; Armin Schneider; Guido Wilms; Götz Thomalla; Robin Lemmens; Vincent N Thijs
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Cerebral Blood Flow Predicts the Infarct Core: New Insights From Contemporaneous Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Shalini Amukotuwa; Matus Straka; Didem Aksoy; Nancy Fischbein; Patricia Desmond; Gregory Albers; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Relationships between brain perfusion and early recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis for acute stroke with large vessel occlusion.

Authors:  Pierre Seners; Guillaume Turc; Stéphanie Lion; Jean-Philippe Cottier; Tae-Hee Cho; Caroline Arquizan; Serge Bracard; Canan Ozsancak; Laurence Legrand; Olivier Naggara; Séverine Debiais; Yves Berthezene; Vincent Costalat; Sébastien Richard; Christophe Magni; Norbert Nighoghossian; Ana-Paula Narata; Cyril Dargazanli; Benjamin Gory; Jean-Louis Mas; Catherine Oppenheim; Jean-Claude Baron
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 8.  [Imaging in acute ischemic stroke using automated postprocessing algorithms].

Authors:  K Egger; C Strecker; E Kellner; H Urbach
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Infarct volume predicts critical care needs in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Authors:  Roland Faigle; Amy W Wozniak; Elisabeth B Marsh; Rafael H Llinas; Victor C Urrutia
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Early diffusion-weighted imaging reversal after endovascular reperfusion is typically transient in patients imaged 3 to 6 hours after onset.

Authors:  Manabu Inoue; Michael Mlynash; Soren Christensen; Hayley M Wheeler; Matus Straka; Aaryani Tipirneni; Stephanie M Kemp; Greg Zaharchuk; Jean-Marc Olivot; Roland Bammer; Maarten G Lansberg; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.