Literature DB >> 23801040

Minimally invasive periprosthetic plate osteosynthesis using the locking attachment plate.

C Kammerlander1, S L Kates, M Wagner, T Roth, M Blauth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Stable fixation of periprosthetic or periimplant fractures with an angular stable plate and early weight bearing as tolerated. INDICATIONS: Periprosthetic femur fractures around the hip, Vancouver type B1 or C. Periprosthetic femur and tibia fractures around the knee. Periprosthetic fractures of the humerus. Periimplant fractures after intramedullary nailing. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loosening of prosthesis. Local infection. Osteitis. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative planning is recommended. After minimally invasive fracture reduction and preliminary fixation, submuscular insertion of a large fragment femoral titanium plate or a distal femur plate. The plate is fixed with locking head screws and/or regular cortical screws where possible. If stability is insufficient, one or two locking attachment plates (LAP) are mounted to the femoral plate around the stem of the prosthesis. After fixing the LAP to one of the locking holes of the femoral plate, 3.5 mm screws are used to connect the LAP to the cortical bone and/or cement mantle of the prosthesis. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Weight bearing as tolerated starting on postoperative day 1 is suggested under supervision of a physiotherapist.
RESULTS: In 6 patients with periprosthetic fractures and 2 patients with periimplant fractures, no surgical complications (e.g., wound infection or bleeding) were observed. The mean time to bony union was 14 weeks. No implant loosening of the locking attachment plate was observed. At the follow-up examination, all patients had reached their prefracture mobility level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801040     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-011-0091-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  9 in total

1.  Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Göran Garellick; Hans Regnér; Peter Herberts; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur.

Authors:  H Lindahl; H Malchau; A Odén; G Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

Review 3.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

4.  The biomechanical analysis of three plating fixation systems for periprosthetic femoral fracture near the tip of a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  James P Lever; Rad Zdero; Markku T Nousiainen; James P Waddell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey Pike; Darin Davidson; Donald Garbuz; Clive P Duncan; Peter J O'Brien; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sung-Rak Lee; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

Review 8.  Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment.

Authors:  Bassam A Masri; R M Dominic Meek; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with the non-contact bridging plate: a new angular stable implant.

Authors:  J B Erhardt; K Grob; G Roderer; A Hoffmann; T N Forster; M S Kuster
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery with locking plate for periprosthetic femoral fractures: technical note.

Authors:  Matthieu Ehlinger; Benjamin Scheibling; Michel Rahme; David Brinkert; Benoit Schenck; Antonio Di Marco; Philippe Adam; François Bonnomet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Richard Schröder; Martin Schulze; Peter Westerhoff; Michael Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  Carl Neuerburg; M Gosch; W Böcker; M Blauth; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  A new classification of TKA periprosthetic femur fractures considering the implant type.

Authors:  Johannes K M Fakler; Cathleen Pönick; Melanie Edel; Robert Möbius; Alexander Giselher Brand; Andreas Roth; Christoph Josten; Dirk Zajonz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.